Franklin D. Roosevelt signs the Social Security Act. Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, behind the President was the administration point person for the Act. |
On
August 14, 1935 President Franklin
Delano Roosevelt signed the Social
Security Act into law. It was the crowning achievement of the New
Deal. It has rightly been acclaimed “the most successful American anti-poverty program in history.” Once considered so popular that proposals
to alter or abolish it were widely considered the third rail of American politics—too dangerous to seriously
advance. But that was before years of a carefully managed drum beat of hysteria
that the system was somehow running out
of money which has convinced many folks,
despite all of the evidence to the
contrary, that they would never live
to collect what they have been paying in for their entire working lives.
That
kind of talk was the nose of the camel
under the tent that allowed retirement
ages to creep upward and talk of
limiting or reducing future benefits become fashionable in some quarters. Proposals to privatize all or part of the system in whole or in part seemed to
be gain steam for a while. These would allow younger workers to take all or part of their Social Security contributions and invest them in private IRA
like accounts.
The
wind was kicked out of that fantasy
in the stock market collapse of 2008,
which understandably raised doubts
in the safety of investment in the volatile Stock Market.
But
some bad ideas just won’t stay dead. Republican Vice Presidential Candidate in
2012 Paul Ryan refloated various
alleged reforms, including the privatization scheme. That was good politics in the short run as
Tea Party activists were threatening to sit out the election because Mitt Romney was allegedly to moderate or perhaps even a hated RINO (Republican in Name Only.) But it surely it contributed to the GOP’s rather decisive drubbing at the
hands of Barack Obama and Social
Security loving Democrats.
This
year the clown car posse of
Republican presidential wannabes have
mostly kept their yaps shut about Social Security even if their plans have not
changed. Libertarian darling Rand Paul is actually for abolition of the system, but you have
to dig deep into his position papers and old speeches to safely conservative audiences to discover it. Hapless Louisiana
Governor Bobby Jindal, dragging bottom in the polls has tried to attract
attention and support from deep pocket
oligarchs by making noises about hitting the program. Jeb
Bush, the White Hope of party regulars and insiders as a supposed moderate
who could win a general election, showed himself to be a clone of his brother who pushed so-called reform and
privatization by suggesting that lazy
Americans need to work until they are 70
or beyond. Should he somehow survive
the swarm more-conservative-than-thou
competitors in the primaries it
is easy to see the Democratic attack ads pointing this out and the damage they
will do.
Of
course the demographics of a lot of Baby Boomers retiring together over the
next few years in a kind of slow motion
avalanche and the reduction of
collection of FICA taxes after the
economic collapse due to heavy unemployment and actually falling wages for those still
employed has put a strain on the system, which could theoretically go bankrupt in a few years unless “something is done.”
But
that something does not have to be further raises in the retirement age,
reduction of benefits, privatization, or changing the system from social insurance to a means tested welfare program—the later
program sometimes surprisingly advanced
on the right knowing that it would erode
support for the system among higher
income voters.
Senator Bernie Sanders has long backed a plan to keep Social Security solvent by raising the cap on income subject to FDIC taxes. |
Bernie Sanders, the Independent Vermont Senator and proudly self-proclaimed socialist who
has surged from being a snubbed dark horse challenger to virtually anointed Hillary Clinton to
being the populist powerhouse, has
long supported and proposed simple Social Security reforms that would keep the
program safe and solvent well into the next century. He points out that simply raising the cap on wage income subject to FICA taxes and/or levying FICA taxes on non-wage
income above a certain level would do
the trick.
Given
the situation it is not surprising that this year’s significant anniversary of
the establishment of the Social Security System has attracted more than the
usual attention.
Before
it was enacted those who lived beyond
their income producing years were the poorest sector of society,
particularly those who could not rely on the support and/or charity of
family. And the necessity of supporting an elderly relative drove
many young families into poverty
because of the extra expenses and
the foregone income of those who had
to become caretakers.
Today,
those over 65 are the least likely of all age cohorts to live in poverty.
The
battle for Federal retirement insurance
was a long one. The first such scheme
was advocated as early as the 1820’s by trade
unionists and socialists in Europe.
German Chancellor Otto Von
Bismarck implemented the first old
age insurance plan in 1889 in the hope of achieving social stability in the new German
Empire and uniting the loyalties of
citizens of the various principalities
he had brought together. The German
system provided contributory retirement
benefits and disability benefits
as well. Participation was mandatory and contributions were taken from the employee, the employer,
and the government. It would become essentially the model for F.D.R.’s initiative.
Social
security plans had spread over Europe but were resisted as unwanted government interference in business in this country. Social security, along with unemployment insurance, a government medical plan, the eight hour day, and limits to child labor were key planks of Eugene V. Debs’ Socialist Party platform of 1912. It was widely supported by most of the labor movement, although some craft unions which had wrung private pension plans from employers were opposed.
Roosevelt’s
Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins spearheaded the drive for Social
Security for the administration.
Republicans in Congress bitterly opposed the program, decrying it as
socialist, un-American, unconstitutional, and a business destroying tax burden. Sound familiar?
But
the program was still wildly popular with voters, who elected large majorities of Democrats committed to the program in
both houses of Congress. Some compromises, however, had to be made
and the original system was far from
perfect. Nearly 50% of all workers
were excluded from coverage
including workers in agriculture, domestic service, government employees, and most teachers,
nurses, hospital employees, librarians,
and social workers. The act also did
not cover those who worked
intermittently including most seasonal
workers.
These
provisions fell especially heavy on women and minorities who were disproportionately engaged in these occupations. 90% of all domestic workers were women and
2/3 of all employed Black women
worked in domestic service. And Southern Black men were predominately
engaged as agricultural workers. For
these reasons the NAACP actually
opposed the legislation that reached Roosevelt’s desk calling it, “a sieve with holes just big enough for the majority
of Negroes to fall through.” Most
women qualified for old age
insurance only through their husbands. Women’s payments under the system were based on
the presumption that mothers would
not be in the work force.
The
Social Security Act also established the Aid
to Dependent Children, a welfare
program designed to support children
in unemployed families who had
exhausted unemployment insurance. Management of these programs was left
to the States, at the insistence of Southern Democrats who did not want to
disturb the racial status quo. As a result Southern states routinely adopted rules making it difficult or nearly impossible for Black families to qualify.
This
became one of the major reasons,
along with increased employment
opportunities as the country geared
up for war later in the decade, for the Great Migration of rural Southern Blacks to Northern cities.
In
1937 the Social Security withholding tax
went into effect and the system began building
reserves to make the first payments
to retirees, originally scheduled for 1942.
Some economists charged that the income
taken out of circulation by the tax was responsible for the 1937 Roosevelt Recession. Others have pointed to drastic reductions in Federal spending because of budget concerns and because key
elements of the New Deal had been declared
unconstitutional as being the real culprit in the downturn. Some felt that building a huge reserve before
beginning to make pay-outs was a drag on
the economy.
So
in 1939 Social Security was amended
to begin making payout two years earlier than planned. This caused the plan to become de facto a pay as you go system with current workers supporting the immediate benefits to retirees instead
of relying of a large accumulated fund. The amendments did establish a trust fund for any surplus funds managed by the Secretary
of the Treasury. The money could be invested in both non-marketable and marketable
securities.
But
because this trust fund became a Treasury Department asset, Congress later
began to borrow against it to fund current general spending.
Amendments
to the act also tied women’s benefits more closely than ever to their husband’s
income. The amendment added wives, elderly widows, and dependent survivors of covered male
workers to those who could receive old age pensions. These individuals had
previously been granted lump sum
payments upon only death or coverage through the Aid to Dependent Children
program.
While
this rescued many widows from
poverty, the amendments also devalued
the value of benefits a woman could receive from her own labor. If a married
wage-earning woman’s own benefit was worth less than 50% of her husband’s
benefit, she was treated as a wife,
not a worker and the dependents of women who were covered by Social Security
benefits were ineligible for her benefits.
Changes were also made to the Aid to Dependent Children program,
including raising the age of eligible
children to 18.
Ida Mae Fuller receives first Social Security check. |
Despite
being far from perfect, the first monthly
payment was issued on January 31, 1940 to Ida May Fuller of Ludlow,
Vermont.
I can’t imagine focusing long enough to research; much less write this kind of article. You’ve outdone yourself with this material. This is great content.
ReplyDeleteSocial Security Benefits