Memorial Day is Monday. For
a lot of folks it’s just the beginning of a long weekend and the start of summer. And that’s
ok. You can go elsewhere to be scolded
for forgetting the sacrifices of the
war dead. Just about every newspaper in the country will serve up an editorial on the subject
plus letters from the VFW.
But a lot of us do hold it in our
hearts for very compelling and complex reasons.
Those
of us who will go to church services tomorrow
will hear various reflections on the
meaning.
My
Unitarian Universalists, who tend to be, on the whole, anti-war folks, often find themselves conflicted. How do we honor the final sacrifices of warriors
without necessarily honoring or glorifying
war itself? How can we express
sincere love of country while acknowledging its frequent errors and injustice? Can we place our hands over our hearts and bow our heads as a distant
Taps
is blown and a flag is lowered to
half-staff without feeling hypocritical?
Can we twist a Poppy around a button
without embracing the jingoism of
some veterans’ organizations? It was
F. Scott Fitzgerald who reminded us
that “The test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing
ideas at the same time and continue to function.” As for me, I choose to lay my symbolic wreath on the
memorials to departed souls.
Some Unitarian Universalist congregations will encourage people to light a candle in remembrance on Memorial Day. |
Those
of us who will go to church services tomorrow
will hear various reflections on the
meaning.
My
Unitarian Universalists, who tend to be, on the whole, anti-war folks, often find themselves conflicted. How do we honor the final sacrifices of warriors
without necessarily honoring or glorifying
war itself? How can we express
sincere love of country while acknowledging its frequent errors and injustice? Can we place our hands over our hearts and bow our heads as a distant
Taps
is blown and a flag is lowered to
half-staff without feeling hypocritical?
Can we twist a Poppy around a button
without embracing the jingoism of
some veterans’ organizations? It was
F. Scott Fitzgerald who reminded us
that “The test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing
ideas at the same time and continue to function.” As for me, I choose to lay my symbolic wreath on the
memorials to departed souls.
The
question for some might be which souls. Do some get left out?
Remembrance
of the war dead is all well and good.
But, especially in modern wars,
soldiers, sailors, and airmen are
only a fraction of the victims. Civilians, both those who just got in the way—collateral damage in the cold, efficient jargon of the military—and
those murdered as a matter of strategy and policy dwarf the dead in uniforms.
Despite
international treaties and high minded and high
flown declarations of noble intent by governments,
insurgents, and other involved factions, the accepted dogma of modern warfare is
that civilian deaths, the more brutal and indiscriminate the better,
will “demoralize” the enemy and “sap them of the will to resist.”
This
is utter hogwash. It has never
been the case. Civilian deaths
simply inflame the passions of the
targeted peoples, raise their
determination to both resist—and if possible wreck vengeance. It also
sets up generational resentments and
enmities that threaten to rekindle conflicts again and again.
Ask
the “indomitable” people of London. Or for that matter the Germans under Allied carpet
bombing or the Japanese whose wood and paper cities flashed over in fire storms even before we dropped atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Although
the Axis Powers were eventually overwhelmed by superior military and industrial capacity, the war was not shortened by even one day by demoralization due to civilian
deaths. Even in the case of the Atomic
bomb drops—which were widely viewed as forcing the Empire of Japan to surrender
before a hugely costly invasion of
the Home Islands—it was not the vaporization of the population of two cities
that caused the ultimate surrender,
but the calculation of the General Staff
that the military would be rendered
useless by atomic attacks on their forces and equipment.
Modern
Terrorism is the war of the weak against the strong. And it assumes that enough mayhem will break the will of whatever presumed oppressor. But there is no real difference between leaving a bomb in a mailbox and flattening a neighborhood with drones. It is simply a matter of scale and technological
sophistication.
All modern war is, in essence, terrorism.
Drone War dead--just a shrug for collateral damage. |
In
the mid 1990’s I was asked to write a poem for a Memorial Day Sunday service at the Congregational Unitarian Church in Woodstock. I was asked to
write something that memorialized ALL of
the war dead. Using the headlines of the day—a time when our
nation was supposedly at peace but
while—this is what I came up with:
In The Century of Death
They
are like that grainy photo on page six
of a million tires burning somewhere in New Jersey.
We shake our heads
and click our tongues
with disapproval and dismay,
reflect a split second
before we turn the page
and hurry on to check out
Ann Landers,
the crossword puzzle,
National League standings
or the price of gold in London.
of a million tires burning somewhere in New Jersey.
We shake our heads
and click our tongues
with disapproval and dismay,
reflect a split second
before we turn the page
and hurry on to check out
Ann Landers,
the crossword puzzle,
National League standings
or the price of gold in London.
They
are the dead,
an uncounted century
of waste and carnage,
stacked as carelessly and deep
as those tires,
alike the cast off refuse
of industrial efficiency.
an uncounted century
of waste and carnage,
stacked as carelessly and deep
as those tires,
alike the cast off refuse
of industrial efficiency.
And like those tires they earn
a moment of our passing pity
in the rush of our busy lives
between work and soccer practice,
haircut and committee meeting.
Unless
by accident we are near
and a pungent change of wind
stings our noses and eyes with acrid smoke
and oily ash drifts
onto our own innocent cheeks.
and a pungent change of wind
stings our noses and eyes with acrid smoke
and oily ash drifts
onto our own innocent cheeks.
—Patrick
Murfin
Note: This
poem appeared in my Skinner House
Meditation Manual, We Build Temples in
the Hart, published in 2004 in Boston
No comments:
Post a Comment