The Parthenon was originally brightly painted. |
Sitting
on top of the Acropolis, the stony high point of Athens, the Parthenon in all of its ruined
glory is one of the most famous
structures in the world, an icon
of classic antiquity, and for the Greeks, the symbol of their cultural glory.
But its current condition is not just the result of centuries of wear and tear or even of the earth quakes that shake the eastern Mediterranean. Here’s what happened.
The
Parthenon we know today was the second—some believe the third—temple structure
on that hill. The first was begun
shortly after the Battle of Marathon about
490 BCE.
It was a sanctuary for Athena
Parthenos, the Virgin Athena. It replaced even older temple structures to
other gods. Alas, the structure, sometimes called the proto Parthenon, did not last long and
was not even finished when the Persians sacked
the city and razed the Acropolis
in 480 BCE.
Some
believe that a second proto Parthenon was begun around 466 BCE and abandoned before completion, its foundation used in the present
structure. This theory, propounded by German archeologist Wilhelm Dörpfeld
around 1890 is not now widely held.
Most
believe the site was left vacant for 33 years, some say because of an oath sworn by the Greek allies before the Battle of Plataea in 479 BCE declaring that the sanctuaries
destroyed by the Persians would not be rebuilt until Greece was safe from
further Persian invasion. The Peace of Callias between the Greeks and the Persians in 450 BCE supposedly
relieved the Athenians of their obligation. But in fact decades of war had emptied
the city’s coffers. There was no money for public works on a grand scale.
The
great Athenian leader Pericles relocated
the seat of the Delian League, the
alliance of more than 150 Greek city
states which ringed the Aegean and
Black Seas which defeated the
Persians, from the island of Delos to
Athens and made the Acropolis its de facto headquarters. Athens was then the preeminent power in that corner of the world, and like many a victor before him, Pericles was
determined to show off that power and
wealth in stone. He ordered the crown of the Acropolis leveled and the construction of a new
temple to Athena. Construction lasted
from 447 to at least 432 BCE.
We
know that the architects of the new
building were Ictinos and Callicrates and the sculptor Pheidias was both the general artistic supervisor and the creator of the bas relief decoration, incidental
sculpture, and the giant statue of Athena
Parthenos that was the center piece of the interior. More on her later.
It
was a massive project to build the temple which measured 228.0 x 101.4 feet at
the base with 46 out and 23 inner Doric
columns supporting a massive roof of
marble tiles. The largest single
expense in its creation was the transportation
of tons of the stone from Mount
Pentelicus, about 10 miles from Athens, to the Acropolis. The finished work is considered the finest
example of Greek architecture ever built and inspired the later Romans and well as classical revival architecture for public buildings that was popular in Europe and America for a
century and a half.
Interestingly,
although we call the Parthenon a temple, it was evidently not originally a
place of worship—it was more of a public
monument, a center for civic events, and perhaps more than
anything a treasury. The Cult
of Athena Polias, the civic
protector of the city, worshiped nearby
in the more ancient temple on the northern side of the Acropolis. Nor
were there any know priestesses or rituals associated with the site.
A reproduction of the Statue of Athena Parthenos by Pheidias, the centerpiece of the Parthenon litterally clothed in the treasury of Athens. |
Phidias’s
famous statue was not an object of
veneration which must at all times be
ritually attended, cleaned, and preserved. Which is probably a good thing because the
statue was assembled on a wooden core,
covered with shaped bronze plates
covered in turn with removable gold
plates, with the flesh of the
goddess’s face and arms made
from ivory. The gold, made from melted coins seized from enemies of Athens, weighed 44 talents—about
2,400 pounds. Importantly, the plate could
be removed. Essentially, it represented
a large portion of the treasury of the
Delian League. The gold plates were
removed at least once by Lachares in
296 BCE to pay his troops and were replaced by gilded bronze plates.
The
trouble is, no matter how big and heavy you make your treasury by turning it
into a monument, eventually someone will
conquer you and haul it away. Which is just what happened. The Romans
carted it away in the 5th Century
C.E. It was reported in Constantinople
before disappearing entirely. We
know pretty much what it looked like, however, from copies, vase painting, gems, literary descriptions, and coins.
The
Parthenon itself stood and remained dedicated to Athena for nearly 1000
years. During much of that time it was painted in vivid colors, not at all the austere
white that we imagine. We know that
from the contemporary accounts of visitors to Athens and it has been confirmed
by the recent archeology which using modern
technology have identified tiny
residue of paint. Undoubtedly it was
re-pained after a major fire in the 3rd Century
destroyed the roof, which was replaced
by wood with clay tiles and pitched
more steeply than the original, and damaged the great statue of Athena.
In
an act of Christian triumphalism Emperor
Theodosius II decreed in 435 AD that all pagan temples in the Byzantine
Empire be closed. The Empire carted
off many of the remaining treasures and the Parthenon was left open for further
looting.
After
that the building fell into other hands and was converted to other uses. Around 590 it was converted to an Orthodox Church known at different
times as Church of the Parthenos Maria
(Virgin Mary), or the Church of the Theotokos (Mother of God). Many physical
alterations and additions had to be made to the building, pagan sculptures
that could not be re-interpreted as
Christian were removed and many were
destroyed, Christian texts were carved
into some pillars, and interior walls
were painted with icons. It became one of the four most holy Orthodox pilgrimage places.
The
Fourth Crusade conquered Byzantium
in 1204 and Athens fell under the sway of the Catholic Church, which tore out Orthodox iconography and renamed
the building the Church of Our Lady. Other physical alterations were made,
including the construction of a bell
tower at the southwest corner. And so it remained for another 250 years.
Then
it was time for the Catholics to exit the stage. In 1456, Ottoman
Turks laid siege to Athens which was defended
by a Florentine army which made
its last stand on the Acropolis, holding out for two years before surrendering to the Turks. By the turn
of the 16th Century they converted
the building to a mosque, scouring it of graven images, both Catholic and pagan, and extending the old
church tower into a minaret.
Despite
all of these changes of hands, the basic structural integrity of the building
was intact and much of the sculptural ornamentation, especially the frieze and pediments were well preserved.
Several westerners visited
the city, wrote detailed descriptions, and made drawings of the venerable
building. Everyone who saw it was struck by its beauty.
In
1687 the Venetians, the dominant naval and military power in the Mediterranean decided to retake Athens for
the greater glory of the Church as part of its wider war against the
Ottomans. Or maybe they just wanted to
sack the city. Hard to tell the
difference.
Francesco
Morosini and his subordinate general, the Swede Count Otto Wilhelm Königsmarck laid siege to Athens. As the Catholic before them had done, the
Ottomans fortified the Acropolis—and they made the Parthenon their main arsenal,
filling it with hundreds of barrels of powder. In retrospect it was probably not the
wisest idea to make the most visible target in the city into a
literal powder keg.
Morosini
seems to have been informed of how the Parthenon was
being used by a deserter—or perhaps even by a Turkish agent in the
belief that the attackers would never target such a historic treasure. They were wrong. Morosini pounded the city with artillery
from the surrounding hills. He did not
spare the temple. A mortar round
pierced the roof on September 26, 1687 and exploded in the magazine.
The explosion was tremendous. Greek architect and archaeologist Kornilia Chatziaslani described the destruction:
. ...three of
the sanctuary’s four walls nearly collapsed and three-fifths of the sculptures
from the frieze fell. Nothing of the roof apparently remained in place. Six
columns from the south side fell, eight from the north, as well as whatever remained
from eastern porch, except for one column. The columns brought down with them
the enormous marble architraves, triglyphs and metopes
Three
hundred defenders and civilians were killed outright. Stone fragments rained down like shrapnel over a wide area wounding
hundreds more. Fires were ignited that
burned much of the Acropolis and much of the city including many homes. Of course it finished off Turkish resistance. Morosini occupied the city in triumph.
Count
Königsmarck would later claim
that Morosini regretted the “accidental” destruction of the temple, but in his
own report back to Venice the commander boasted of his lucky shot. The next day Morosini ordered the looting
of the smoldering wreckage. His troops
tried to remove sculptures of Poseidon
and Athena’s horses fell to the
ground and smashed as they tried to detach them from the building’s west
pediment. The victor had to content
himself with lesser spoils. 21st Century Venetians with their sinking
city may be all about preserving “our priceless architectural and cultural
heritage”, but clearly in the 17th Century they didn’t give a rat’s ass.
Morosini
held the city for less than a year, retreating when the Ottomans assembled a
large army to dislodge him.
When
the Turks returned they did not try to rebuild the nearly destroyed
building. They did use some of the stone
wreckage as construction material
elsewhere in the city and used smaller pieces as land fill. They also
discovered there was a lucrative European market for antiquities and began to loot the ruins for their own profit and to
allow visitors to cart of souvenirs
which were sometimes hacked from still standing components.
Looted from the Parthenon, the so-called Elgin Marbles are proudly displayed in the British Museum. Despite decades of appeals and negotiations the Brits refuse to return what they stole. |
Thomas
Bruce, the 7th Earl of Elgin
obtained a controversial permit from government to remove pieces from the
Parthenon while serving as the British
ambassador to the Ottoman Empire from 1799 to 1803. Through 1812, Elgin’s agents removed about
half of the surviving sculptures of the Parthenon and carted them away to
England where they found a prominent home in the British Museum.
A
war of independence restored Athens
to Greek hands for the first time in
centuries in 1832. For the Greeks the
Parthenon was a great cultural symbol.
They quickly leveled the minaret and razed the remaining portions of the
mosque. They cleared the Acropolis of
all Latin medieval and Ottoman
buildings. But they had no money for
further restoration or to prevent continued looting by western antiquity collectors and dealers.
The
Greeks always protested the legitimacy
of the Lord Elgin’s questionable deal—indeed the supposed permit documents from
the Sultan have never been
found. The Greek government has been demanding a return of their patrimony since 1975 when they began a
comprehensive project to restore the Parthenon and the Acropolis. The British Government has steadfastly
refused on the principle that they were
stolen fair and square despite decades of rancorous negotiations.
There
have been several attempts at not so much restoring
the Parthenon, but cleaning and preserving
it in its current state of ruin.
Heavy air pollution and acid rain continue to do damage to the
building and some predict may complete what the Venetians started.
No comments:
Post a Comment