All founders of great religions need
a feast day to be celebrated by
their followers. Most often the feast is identified with the birthday,
death date, transformation to godhood,
or ascension to immortality. In the case of Zoroaster, the founder of an ancient proto-monotheistic religion which
blossomed in Persia (Iran) and became
the state religion of vast empires, the feast is a traditional birthday. But not only is his real birthday not known, scholars have trouble identifying
the era in which he lived by margins of hundreds of years. At least modern
ones do better than the Greek
historian of philosophy Diogenes and the Roman Plutarch who misdated
him by several millennia at around 6,000 BCE.
The
problem with dating Zoroaster is largely a problem of jibing linguistic
development with known historical events. All stories agree that Zoroaster was a
priest of an already ancient and long established polytheistic
religion who developed new ideas elevating the deity Ahura
Mazda of wisdom, truth, and pure goodness to the status of Supreme Being and Creator,
while demoting various other deities to Fravashi, roughly
analogous to angels or spirit saints and demons under a Satan-like
Angra Mainy who introduces the destructive mentality of the lie into the world. Works of Holy Scriptures are attributed
to him—Gathas, Yasna, Vendidad, Visperad,
Yashts—which
are included in an overarching Scripture
that includes ritual practices, prayers, and fragments of other texts not attributed to him.
The problem is that the oldest of his texts are in an early form
of an Aryan tongue known as Avestan of which the texts are the only surviving documentation. That would seem to date these writings, 17
poems of the Gathas, to sometime before 2,000
BCE. But later writings, including
supposed autobiographical accounts of
his life were written in Persian dialects
from around 600 BCE. The great age of
the Gathas is what convinced the Greeks and Romans that
Zororaster’s origins were very early.
Scholars now date the historic Zoroaster to somewhere in a 200 to 300 year range centering on 600
BCE. That would indicate that he adapted as his own far more ancient teachings and popularized them.
Then there is the problem of just where
the hell Zoroaster was from. A lot of claimants for this honor. The earliest texts
identify him as coming from Airyanem Vaejah meaning roughly the Expanse of the Aryans a/k/a the Iranians. It may reference
a fast flowing river and valley, perhaps in the southern central Asian plateau or in the north of modern Afghanistan. These
same texts fail to mention any of the well-known tribes of western Iran—the Medes, Persians, and Parthians.
Later texts, however, place him in
western Iran and identify his priestly
cast was the Magi of the Medes
and Persians. Modern scholars tend to dismiss the possibility of him being from western Iran and argue between
themselves over points of origin from central and eastern Iran, Afghanistan, Baluchistan in western modern Pakistan,
Bactria on the plateau north of
the Hindu-Kush Mountains, Turkmenistan,
and the vast steppes west of the Volga.
Put your money down and take
your pick.
Although Zoroaster’s original
autobiographical writings were thought destroyed in when Alexander the Great’s Army captured Persepolis, capital of the Achaemenid
Empire centered in Persia and burned the royal library there. Or not. Some scholars dismiss this and say that the
original texts, if they existed were lost long before. At any rate later summaries of the lost texts provide a fairly detailed biography.
Zoroaster was born into a Bronze Age Aryan culture in a priestly line, the Spitamids. His father and mother were identified by name—Poroschasp and Dughdova. He followed the family trade but was increasingly dissatisfied with ritual practices that included animal sacrifice and the corrupt use of
religion by a governing caste of princelings and soldiers to oppress the mass of common people. He took a wife, Huvovi and
together they had three sons and three daughters.
At age 30 Zoroaster was illuminated by
Ahura Mazda and began preaching his revised worship of the elevated deity and his philosophy of a struggle between the forces of
pure truth and goodness and those of lies and evil. He eliminated
animal sacrifice, simplified ritual,
and argued against excessive religious taxes
diverted to the caste of worldly rulers. He developed
a system which, for its time and place, was relatively light
on miracles and magic and developed an advanced ethical philosophy.
Huvovi and his children were his first converts and his sons became his priests. At least one
daughter was said to have made a
strategic marriage to a local ruler that helped spread adoption of the new religion. Zoroaster faced many obstacles in his preaching,
including the fierce opposition of traditional priests and of the nobility who felt undermined. He was shunned and outcast in his own mother’s hometown. Yet eventually truth and goodness—aša—triumphed over druj—the lie and much of
Zoroaster’s homeland, wherever it was, was brought to the faith.
No mention was made of how the Master died, but later traditions have him murdered at his altar in Balkh located in Afghanistan during a Holy War between Turans—an Iranian tribe—and the Persian Empire in 583 BCE. This tale undoubtedly owes more to politico/religious struggles for legitimacy within the Persian Empire and its successors than any historical truth.
We do know that by reign of Cyrus the Great, about 560-530 BCE, Zoroastrianism was wide-spread in his newly unified Persian Achaemenid
Empire, although not yet a state
religion. Through their enemies the Persians, the Greeks learned about Zoroaster and his teachings, which later
became influential in their emerging philosophy though the work of Plato
and others. Likewise the empire
brought it to the Jews who were also
influenced, especially by Zoroastrian duality
which shows up in the concepts of the struggle
between light and darkness of the Essenes as evidenced in
the Dead Sea Scrolls. Through both the Greeks and the Jews it
influenced Christianity and later Islam, which conquered the Zoroastrian
heartland.
The name Zoroaster is, in fact, the Greek form of the name which has
become generally used in the West. In Persian the name is Zarathustra, which Friedrich
Nietzsche adopted for his philosophical
novel, Also sprach Zarathustra—Thus Spoke Zarathustra—in which he put
his own thoughts on the death of God and the Übermensch into the old prophet’s mouth.
When Darius I came to the Achaemenid throne in 522 BCE he was known to be a personal devotee of Ahura Mazda, but at the time that did not
necessarily mean he was a Zoroastrian.
He could still have recognized the ancient pantheon but simply dedicated himself to that divinity. On the other hand,
he may have been. Not long after Darius
died, after extending the empire
from Egypt and the Levant to Trace and Macedonia in the Balkans—after
failing to conquer Sparta, Athens, and the Greeks—east into India, Zoroastrianism
became the state religion, although other
cults were generally permitted.
The Achaemenids fell to Alexander, but when his heirs could not maintain his eastern empire, the Parthians arose and established an
Empire from eastern Asia Minor down
through both sides of the Persian Gulf and
east through Afghanistan. This empire
lasted from 247 BCE to 224 AD when it disintegrated after a long series of wars
with the Roman Empire and the rise
of the Sasanians. This empire would also make
Zoroastrianism a state religion
alongside the ancient gods of the Babylonians.
The Zoroastrians had a last, long run as an imperial
religion with the Sasanian Empire, which
was the chief rival of the Byzantines to
the east, between 224 and 651 when it finally fell to the Islamic invasion.
The Islamic Caliphate not only absorbed the entire Sasanian Empire, it
quickly expanded to cover roughly the same territory as the old Achaemenid
Empire and then some.
Despite the conquest, under the Umayyad
Caliphate there was little pressure
put upon the local populations to abandon their traditional religions so
long as they were monotheistic,
their activities did not disrupt or insult Islam, and adherents paid a tax—jizya which was leveled on non-Muslims living in the realm. Over time, however, the tax grew repressive and barriers to
advancement in the Caliphate encouraged many, especially among the elite and in the major cities, to convert. After the beginning of the Crusades there was a general backlash against all religious minorities and more oppressive steps were taken,
including local rioting and massacres were allowed to transpire by authorities.
During the Caliphate the
Zoroastrians had adopted a stance of non-prostilazation to convince
their overloads that unlike Christians they would not try to covert Muslims. Only those born into the religion were
accepted as members. In the long
run, as pressure continued on
their populations, this custom,
along with a traditionally low birth rate, and continued abandonment of the faith for Islam, contributed to a steady
decline in numbers over the ages
until only a tiny minority remained
in the old Iranian and Afghan strongholds.
After a period of particularly
brutal repression many adherents fled
to India where they established
communities on the southern west coast beginning in the 9th Century. That community today represents the largest concentration of Zoroastrians
in the world. Known locally as the Parsis, less than 70,000 were counted
in the 2001 Indian census, mostly concentrated around Mumbai.
Their long isolation from their
ancestral roots has resulted in customs
that are sometimes at variance with
traditional Zoroastrianism and mirror
the Hindu communities in which they dwell.
This includes a modification of
the ban on accepting those not born
into the religion by accepting the children of marriages to non-Zoroastrians. That has not, however, prevented a general population decline, hastened
by emigration to the United States and Canada where there are now
small communities.
Pressure in the traditional
heartland has only worse. The Shi’a in Iran and the Taliban Sunni in Afghanistan, as well
as Islamists in the southern Caucuses have been equally
zealous in their persecutions making
many refugees who have to disguise their identities. Hard numbers in these circumstances are
hard to come by. Less than 200,000 are
thought to be scattered over a broad region overlapping several borders.
Today, probably fewer than one million Zoroastrians are left world-wide to celebrate their Master’s birthday.
No comments:
Post a Comment