In 2017 Barack
Obama spent the last days of his Presidential term churning out sentence commutations. Hundreds were given to non-violent
drug offenders facing draconian sentences under the exceptionally harsh Federal Sentence
Standards, the most vindictive
in the world. But there are
so many of those victims of the
failed war on drugs that the commutations hardly made a dent in
the American gulag. Also
given leniency were some white collar criminals, the kind of
offenders that drew the more stingy grace of Obama’s predecessor
George W. Bush. Even a
beloved baseball icon, Willie
McCovey of the San Francisco Giants who
was convicted on Income Tax evasion was
one of 64 that drew and outright pardon from
the President.
Most controversially Obama commuted the sentences of whistleblower Chelsea Manning, the former Army Private Bradley Manning, and Puerto Rican nationalist leader Oscar Lopez. Inexplicably he did not commute the sentence of ailing American
Indian Movement leader Leonard Peltier who has been behind bars for more than 40
years. Neither did his successors
including Joe Biden and Peltier may well die in prison.
However disappointing and mystifying that travesty of
justice was, Obama gets credit for at least wrestling with the catastrophic effects of the lock-‘em-up-and-throw-away-the-key mania that
created the school to prison pipeline.
No one,
except possibly sex offenders, gun nuts,
and White nationalist terrorists could
expect any such displays of mercy from his successor as occupant
of the Oval Office.
On the contrary. The former Pumpkin-in-Chief and
his administration sought to swell the prison population with those
who resisted his autocratic rule, immigrants, and minorities of
every sort. And the recipients of his
tender mercy were of a very different sort including pardons for the ilk of Arizona
racist sheriff Joe Aripio, Watergate
figure Scooter Libby, right-wing commentator Dinesh D’Souza, Army Lt. Michael Behenna who was convicted
of murdering an Iraqi man, right wing Canadian
media mogul Conrad Black, Chalmer
Lee Williams convicted of illegal firearms sales, Army Major Mathew Golsteyn who was awaiting trial on a charge of
murdering a suspected Afghan bomb maker,
Lt. Clint Lorance convicted of
murdering two Afghan civilians, and a slew of former officials, aides,
and associates who might testify against him.
The
former Resident’s sentence commutations included well connected bank fraudster Sholom Rubashkin, arsonists
Dwight and Steven Hammond who
inspired Nevada anti-government
extremists Ammon and Ryan Bundy in
their armed seizure of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, and Medicare scammer Ted Shul who ran faith-based behavioral healthcare treatment
centers for juveniles.
Do you
detect a pattern here?
Forty-six
year ago another incoming president on his first day in
office, January 21, 1977, issued a blanket
amnesty of most draft evaders,
including those who went to Canada or
assumed new identities and went underground in the states.
President
Jimmy Carter’s controversial act,
which brought harsh criticism from veterans’ organizations and
near mutinous grumbling from some high
level officers in the military, was not unexpected. It fulfilled a campaign promise. The idea was to put the bitter national divisions over the Vietnam War and Nixon years
behind us, or in Carter’s own words, “to bind up the nation’s wounds.”
The accidental President, Gerald
Ford, had issued a conditional
pardon for draft offenders, including those who were abroad, in September
of 1974. That was mainly to
provide cover on the left for his pre-emptive
pardon of his predecessor, Richard
Nixon for any offenses that he “may
have committed.” The Ford conditional pardon is generally better remembered than Carter’s much more substantial action because of that
linkage despite requiring those who accepted
the pardon to work in alternative
service occupations similar to those of conscientious objectors for six to 24 months. Far fewer men
than expected took Ford up on his offer.
Carter’s action was much more
sweeping, but a little noticed provision
said that amnesty would be given to all offenders who requested one. Some resistors refused to make a request because to do so was an admission that they had committed a crime in the first place. Many, many more were unaware, because of hazy press coverage, that they had to make a
request. The Justice Department
did not even make a cursory effort to inform the eligible by a letter to a “last known address.”
The wording also was unclear on an important point for men like me—did the
amnesty cover those who were already convicted
and had served sentences for
draft offenses? I don’t think that last point has yet been fully answered.
None-the-less tens of thousands of
draft refusers, evaders, and military deserters acted on the assumption that they were covered and
the Justice Department de facto ceased actions against anyone who could have been covered by
amnesty.
During the war, and continuing after
it ended until Draft call-ups stopped
in 1973, 209,517 men were accused of violating draft laws, and another 360,000
were never formally charged.
Around 100,000 went abroad, 90% of them to Canada.
The exact number who went “underground” has never been established, but is
thought to be in the tens of thousands.
Upwards of 50,000 of those in Canada
chose to stay there rather than
return home. Most were granted Landed
Immigrant status and eventually Canadian
citizenship. A highly educated
group with significant resources,
these people had an impact on Canada. Many became leading figures in academia,
the arts, and in politics. They are widely credited with/accused of moving Canadian politics generally to the left.
Likewise, a good, but unknown,
number of those who went underground chose to continue to live their lives
under the identities that they assumed. In the 1960’s and early 70’s it was absurdly easy
to establish a new identity. It was thought that as this cohort became
eligible for Social Security or died many of these assumed identities would unravel, but that seems to be exception
rather than the rule.
As for an old Draft con like me, I never got any amnesty papers. But I have lived my life quite openly, and even drawn some modest attention to myself without further molestation. So far so good.
No comments:
Post a Comment