Gay demonstrators confront New York City riot police on the second night of the Stonewall Rebellion. |
Note: Adapted
from a post on this date in 2010.
On the night of June
27, 1969 something snapped when New York City Police made one
of their regular raids on a Gay bar. Instead of meekly submitting to arrest,
patrons at the Stonewall Inn, a Greenwich Village bar
operated by the Mafia and patronized by the most marginalized
of folks—homeless street kid hustlers, drag
queens, and butch dikes began resisting when police
started to arrest them.
The raid was conducted
by a small team of detectives, uniformed officers and police women led by Deputy
Inspector Seymour Pine of the Public Morals Squad.
For some reason patrons refused to follow the familiar procedure of such
raids—allowing restroom inspections of individuals in women’s clothing to
determine if they were men and providing identification upon request. Dumfounded by resistance, police called for backup
and paddy wagons. There was some
scuffling inside.
Meanwhile some patrons who had been released were joined by passersby
outside the bar. The crowd quickly
swelled. Taunts and jeers were exchanged
between the police and crowd. The crowd
began to interfere as drag queens were led to the wagons. When a lesbian made several unsuccessful
attempts to escape, she was beaten and cried out to the crowd, “Why don't you
guys do something?”
That ignited the crowd which began pelting police with beer cans, coins, and
rubble from a nearby construction sight.
They attacked the wagons, freeing some of those arrested. Police retreated into the bar and barricaded
themselves. They grabbed some members of
the crowd as they went, including folk singer Dave Van Ronk
who had been playing at a nearby club and came out to investigate the ruckus,
and Howard Smith, a writer for the Village Voice.
Observers reported that the most aggressive members of
the crowd were the young street kids.
They used uprooted parking meters as a ram to try and break down the
doors of the bar and crashed through the plywood covered windows. When they got in police drew their pistols
and threatened to shoot while rioters used lighter fluid to start a fire.
The Fire Department responded as the crowd outside grew to
hundreds. The Tactical Police
Force (TPF) arrived in riot gear to rescue the besieged officers in
the saloon. They formed a phalanx and
moved up the street being blocked and taunted by an impromptu kick line
of drag queens and “sissies.”
Rioters and police played a brand of violent tag around the narrow streets
of the Village until after 4 AM. The
riots were front page news.
They were not over. The next night
even larger crowds gathered in front of the building and fighting
continued. Despite heavy rain there were
sporadic eruptions the next two nights.
Meanwhile the gay community, which had been largely unorganized except for
the small Mattachine Society which advocated a campaign to
educate the public that Homosexuals were “normal,” began to
meet and debate tactics. Thousands of
fliers were printed for a Wednesday march.
The original rebellion, which had been entirely spontaneous, was already
laying the groundwork for a new, open and defiant Gay movement. Taking cues from the Civil Rights
Movement and the Peace Movement, which were also
confronting authorities with a new militancy, and taking advantage of the
traditional anti-establishment radicalism of the Village, the beginning of a
new movement was taking place.
On Wednesday the Village Voice—the most liberal paper in New York,
carried a harshly critical piece on the riots describing participants as
“forces of faggotry.” Angry
demonstrators descended on the Voice offices that night and threatened to burn
them down. Other violent confrontations
erupted in the neighborhood as police tried to stop marchers, this time for the
first time carrying signs and “making demands.”
That was the last night of disturbances, but things changed quickly over
the next year. Two new militant Gay
organizations emerged in New York, the Gay Liberation Front,
which allied itself with the broader radical movement, and the Gay
Activists Alliance which advocated a focused campaign demanding an end
to police harassment and for broader rights for Gays.
Similar or allied groups sprang up in major cities and college towns across
the country. New Yorkers founded three
new newspapers, Gay, Come Out!, and Gay Power which
soon had press runs to 20-2500. Again,
similar publications were founded across the country.
On June 28, 1970 the anniversary of what was now being called the Stonewall
Rebellion was marked by Christopher Street Liberation Day
and a 51 block march from the Village to Central Park with
thousands of marchers filling the streets.
Marches were also held in Chicago and Los
Angeles.
These became the Gay Pride Marches that have become annual
events across the country. There was a huge
march Sunday in Chicago. An
indication of how accepted and mainstream Gay rights have become, at least in big
cities, is that there were official floats sponsored by the city’s sports
teams. Politicians galore and all of the major media turn out to court the
potent Gay vote and consumer demographic.
But there were still loads drag queens and all of the high camp fun that
the carnival-like parades have become known for.
It was also the very first Gay Pride Parade for my granddaughter Caitlin, who is not afraid of coming out. Her proud mom Heather was there at her side.
Good for both of them. Wish I
could have been there, too.
But I hope in all of the celebrations, the roots in the struggle for simple
human respect fought out on the streets of Greenwich Village were not forgotten.
Patrick, did you mean to say *not* forgotten?
ReplyDeleteThanks, Andy. Fixed.
ReplyDeleteThe High Noon The Emerson Avenger Fought Back Against The UUA's Bullshit Blasphemous Libel Accusation. . .
ReplyDeleteI hope in all of the Stonewall celebrations, the roots of my struggle for simple human respect fought out on the streets of Montreal & Boston, thanks to egregious institutional *stonewalling* and denial on the part of the Unitarian Church of Montreal and the UUA, will not be "memory holed" by you.
Robin--I have said this before. This is not a forum for your personal and never ending axe to grind. Don't make me bar your comments again.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIf Unitarian Universalists responded to my "axe" in a manner that genuinely honored & upheld the claimed principles and ideals of Unitarian Universalism I would not have to keep grinding it would I Patrick? Not only do U*Us never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity to work towards a genuinely just & equitable resolution to our little "war of words", but they never miss an opportunity to escalate this ludicrously drawn out conflict, such as by sending me a Stikeman Elliott cease and desist demand letter falsely accusing me of the archaic crime of blasphemous libel for blogging about a few U*U rapists and pedophiles.
ReplyDeleteI can't "make" you do anything Patrick. Only *you* can decide whether or not you want to cover up and hide U*U injustices and abuses such as those mentioned in my comment.
Although the core issues are somewhat different there are some strong parallels to the Stonewall riot, and my protest in front of the offices of Stikeman Elliott, in terms of victims of oppression standing up to their oppressors.