Note: This
piece is a re-tread, but the issue keeps bobbing to the surface as claims are
made about the Faith, or lack thereof,
of our most admired President. Lately
the New Atheists have made their bid to appropriate him on just as shaky ground
as the older claims of Evangelicals.
Meanwhile I am betting at least one sermon this month at a UU
congregation claims him “at least in spirit.”
Back in 2009 the nation was in the
grip of a wave of Lincoln mania in
conjunction with the bi-centennial of
his birth. There was an avalanche of new
books and articles examining every aspect of the Great Emancipator’s life, work, and connections.
The Religious Right—those who were not also neo-Confederates any way—was busy, as usual, trying to
retroactively adopt him as an Evangelical
Christian. On the other hand the
small world of the Unitarian
Universalist blog-o-sphere and a spate of sermons, tried to lay claims that
Lincoln was, at least in spirit, a Unitarian
or a Universalist.
Scott
Wells, a leading Universalist and
Christian blogger from a Southern background
claimed to be immune to the cult of Lincoln worship. For his family Lincoln represented
oppression, destruction, and, for them, the nightmare of Reconstruction. He also
scolded U.U.s for trying to appropriate Lincoln into our ever popular lists of famous UUs.
The following is adapted from my
response to Wells.
Hagiography aside, there are many reasons to put your understandable
regional bias aside and spend some time studying Abraham Lincoln. As flawed and
inconsistent as any man, he is still rewarding for the subtlety and depth of
his thought and his life long struggle to reconcile a true and deeply held idealism with both personal ambition and the need to act in a brutal and unforgiving
environment. Even Harry Truman, a Missouri Democrat whose unreconstructed Confederate mother never forgave him for making Lincoln’s Birthday a national holiday, came to deeply admire
his ancient tribal enemy.
The family at First Presbyterian--image still used by the church. |
Lincoln’s relationships to religion are not a murky as some
suppose. Certainly any denomination that would attempt to claim him as its own
is self-delusional. Here is some of what we know.
1) At no time in
Lincoln’s life did he ever claim to be a Christian
as understood at his time or to be saved.
2)
As far is known he was never baptized
and never became a member of any
church.
3)
Among his earliest published
writings were attacks on a political rival, Peter Cartwright who was a fire-and-brimstone Methodist circuit rider
who had accused Lincoln of infidelity
and had used his wide Methodist connections to build a Democratic political
operation. The articles, which
appeared under a nom de plume, mocked
both the man’s religion and his attempts to use his followers as a political
base. Lincoln claimed never to have
“denied the truth of Scripture” but
did acknowledge that he was not a church member. Lincoln defeated Cartwright for a seat in Congress, but Cartwright’s charges—and
his own tart responses—would dog him
for years.
4)
Like most self-educated
Americans who had literary aspirations
and who were not versed in the Latin
and Greek of the Eastern college educated elite, Lincoln
had two primary sources to draw from for both inspiration and style—The King
James Version of the Bible and
the popular plays of William Shakespeare.
He knew both. But his writing was infused with the cadences and majesty of the
Bible. He could also, if the occasion called for it, usually in response to
some hypocrisy from the mouth of a believer, quote verse with ease.
5)
He deeply admired Thomas
Jefferson and treasured the Declaration
of Independence as the essential founding
document. He borrowed from Jefferson, and from George Washington, the language of Deism in public discourse.
He frequently spoke of Providence, Creator, and other Deist constructions.
He did not avoid the word God, but
he did not invoke an explicitly Christian
God. One can search in vain for much use of the words Christ or Savior outside
of the context of letters of condolence
to the families of fallen soldiers often echoing back sentiments expressed by
the bereaved. He was all for giving
whatever comfort he could.
6) In Springfield he attended Mary’s
Presbyterian Church and was friendly
with its minister but never joined
the church or partook in the Spartan Presbyterian communion. That hasn’t
stopped that congregation from calling itself “Lincoln’s Church” to this day.
7) He read the published sermons of both William Ellery Channing and Theodore
Parker and appropriated or adapted words from each—especially Parker—in his
speeches. But in practice as President, despite a personally cordial
relationship with Radical Republican
Senator Charles Sumner, he found Abolitionist Unitarians to be pig-headed
impediments to a practical prosecution of the war and a move toward healing
a post-war, re-united country. Despite
this the UU congregation in
Springfield proudly adopts his name.
8) He believed deeply and viscerally
in Fate and implacable Destiny. This was part and parcel of
his widely reported melancholia.
Some scholars have attributed this to a sort of Calvinist hang-over. Could be. But Lincoln’s sense of fate and
destiny seem to rise from far more ancient impulses.
9) There is nothing to connect
Lincoln to institutional Universalism.
Steven Rowe at A Southern “Universalist Church”
History responded to Wells with an excerpt from memoirs by Universalist minister quoting appreciative comment
by Lincoln:
“I used
to think that it took the smartest kind of man to preach and defend
Universalism; I now think entirely different. It is the easiest faith to preach
that I have ever heard. There is more
proof in its favor, than in any other doctrine I have ever heard. I have a suit in court here to-morrow and if I
had as much proof in its favor as there is in Universalism, I would go home,
and leave my student to take charge of it, and I should feel perfectly certain
that he would gain it.” Such were his words.
Unfortunately there are no other
witnesses to Lincoln attending the debate described or speaking this assessment
of it. And I am sure a diligent search
of the memoirs of ministers of other denominations can turn up appreciative
Lincoln quotes, some perhaps true, others the product of devout wishful
thinking. Yet there is much to suggest
that Lincoln privately embraced a kind universalism
of spirit that accepted a common struggle for understanding a greater
mystery that transcended mere denominationalism.
Artist Michelle L. Hamilton depicted Lincoln describing his experiences in a White House seance. |
10) In the White House, with the gruesome burdens of a war-time presidency on his shoulders and the private grief over the
loss of his beloved son Willie,
Lincoln followed Mary’s lead and seemed to take Spiritualism, then at the height of its American popularity, with
due seriousness. At the time many Universalist ministers were also toying—to
considerable controversy—with Spiritualism. But again Lincoln never publicly
endorsed Spiritualism, or acknowledged it as his faith.
In the post-war years both the
Abolitionist preachers with whom he sparred during the war and a generation of
new Unitarian leaders bloodied on the battlefields of that war—Jenkin Lloyd Jones being a prime
example—participated in the myth making that turned the martyred President into
a kind of a Saint. They went too
far. And rubbing the defeated South’s nose in it exacerbated the regional
disdain with which you grew up.
But I think many modern Unitarians and
Universalists can find much with which to resonate in Lincoln’s personal
spiritual journey. It so resembles so
many of our own.
No comments:
Post a Comment