Note—This year we
will forego our usual contemplation of the horrors of the first atomic bomb
attack on Hiroshima to take note of another anniversary.
The anniversary of the Voting
Rights Act generates more interest than usual this year because the gains
once thought secure are under relentless attack Republican attack. The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement
Act, named in honor of the former Civil Rights champion and long-time
member of the House of Representative which aims to reverse
attacks on voting rights made in state after state under GOP control is
stalled in the Senate under threat of a filibuster and
with so-called moderate Democrats refusing to provide the votes necessary
for Vice President Kamala Harris to break a tie in the
evenly divided body.
This week hundreds of protestors heeding
the call of Rev. William Barber’s Moral Mondays and new Poor
Peoples Campaign were arrested at the Capitol in Washington D.C. demanding
an end to the filibuster, enactment of the Lewis Voting Rights Act, and other
critical fairness and parity reforms. In Texas, which is trying to pass some
of the most draconian voter suppression bill in the country, there was a
four-day Georgetown to Washington March involving thousands including Transportation
Secretary and former Texas Representative Beto O’Rourke. State and local marches and events are being
held nation-wide.
Rev. William Barber, Jr. (center) led the Georgetown to Austin March in Texas this week.
Under Section 5 of
the landmark 1965 civil rights law, jurisdictions
with a history of discrimination needed to seek pre-approval
of changes in voting rules that could affect
minorities. It blocked discrimination
before it occurred. In Shelby County V. Holder last year
the Trump packed Supreme Court invalidated
Section 4—which laid out criteria for identifying states and localities covered by Section
5—claiming that current conditions
require a new coverage formula. That left Section 5 intact but unenforceable. The conservative
majority on the court claimed that Congress
could easily adopt a new formula and restore enforcement, knowing full well
that with the House of Representatives then
in the iron grip of reactionary Republican majorities and
control of the Senate that no remedy would be enacted.
Since then, attacks on voting rights have intensified
across the country—and not just in the old Deep
South. Republican Legislatures and Governors have enacted waves of legislation aimed at curbing or
discouraging voting by minorities and
any groups of voters suspected of possible Democratic
tendencies. In the name of fighting
a virtually nonexistent form of voter fraud—registration and voting by non-citizens misrepresenting their status—burdensome proof
of identity legislation, including
very limited numbers of approved
identification documents and fees
and charges for attaining those
documents. Places where applicants can
obtain documents have been reduced requiring burdensome travel and their hours
of operation restricted. Students have been barred from registering where they attend college, even if they life there year round. Early
voting periods have been reduced and restricted. Polling
places have been eliminated and consolidated in minority areas to guarantee long and discouraging lines. It seems
like new and creative ways to curb registration or discourage voting are
introduced every year, churned out by as model
legislation by some rightwing think
tank and spreading from Red State to
Red State like a virus.
Many, maybe even most, of these restrictions eventually get struck
down in the courts, but not before having their desired effect for an election
cycle or two. With Section 4 in place, many of these changes would
have been stopped by Federal review before they were even put in place.
Meanwhile
there is a growing rank-and-file movement
to reclaim voting rights in the same way as they were first won at bitter cost to begin with—with street protests and civil disobedience. The NAACP’s
Moral Monday movement in South
Carolina is a model for a new activism and a movement that has been called
the Selma of the 21st Century.
Lyndon Johnson signing the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Among the witnesses are Senate Co-Sponsor and Republican Minority Leader Everett Dirksen of Illinois, Rev. Ralph Abernathy, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. , Benjamin Hooks and Rosa Parks.
On August 6, 1965 President Lyndon Johnson signed
the landmark National Voting Rights Act of 1965 in a ceremony at the White House attended by leaders
of both parties in Congress and Civil Rights leaders
including the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Benjamin Hooks.
My generation, which grew
up protesting the War in Vietnam, grew to regard Johnson as “the enemy.”
Yet his record on domestic issues was unmatched by
any President except Franklin Delano Roosevelt. His Great Society programs, though far
from perfect, were the last great systematic assault on poverty in
our history. And this Texas
wheeler-dealer accomplished what Northern liberal John F. Kennedy
never could—a comprehensive legislative
attack on discrimination and the subjugation of Black citizens.
Perhaps we expected that
subsequent Democratic Presidents would take up where Johnson left off without the stain of a fruitless war. The
fact is that whatever their intentions, none of them did. The previous year the Civil Rights Act of
1964 opened doors of public accommodations in response to ongoing
campaigns by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC),
the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), branches of the National
Association of Colored People (NAACP), and others.
But the historic pattern of
restricting voting by Blacks through the use of poll taxes, literacy
tests, and outright intimidation that was the hallmark of the Jim
Crow era after Southern Whites dismantled the reforms of post-Civil War Reconstruction,
remained untouched. With new militancy
the SCLC and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC)
turned to campaigns to register voters.
Voting rights demonstrations across the South, often brutally suppressed, like the first attempt of a march from Selma Alabama where young John Lewis had his skull fractured and the deaths of White civil rights workers pressured Lyndon Johnson to act and ultimately gave him the leverage to get an act through Congress. In memory of his sacrifices the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act aims at protecting those gains and extending them.
That campaign took a bloody,
violent turn in Selma, Alabama earlier that year. Marchers attempting to
reach the local Court House to register were attacked and many severely
beaten. Black demonstrator, Jimmy Lee Johnson, was killed during a march
in near-by Marion City.
Then James Reeb, a White Unitarian Universalist Minister who had
responded to a call by Dr. King for support, was beaten to death shortly after
arriving in the city.
Johnson instinctively knew that the
death of the White minister would galvanize public sentiment and support
in the way no number of Black deaths could. A few days later a massive Selma to Montgomery march was turned
back with violence at the Edmund Pettis
Bridge—Bloody Sunday.
On March 15, Johnson addressed a joint session of Congress to call for
the Voting Rights Act. It was introduced in the Senate on March 18 by Senate
Majority Leader Mike Mansfield of Montana
and Republican Minority Leader
Everett Dirksen of Illinois.
A second March to Montgomery, this time
under the protection of Federal Authorities, got underway on
March 21 and arrived at the Alabama capital for a massive rally on March 25
with the renewed purpose to supporting the Voting Rights Act. After the rally a white Unitarian
Universalist volunteer from Michigan, Viola Liuzzo, was shot and killed while driving
a Black demonstrator back to Selma.
The deaths of a white minister and a white woman volunteer during the Selma Campaign spurred Congress to action on the Voting Rights act in a way the vastly more numerous murders of Black activists like Jimmy Lee Jackson had ever done. White privilege thus leveraged the landmark act. At least the Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA) recognized the sacrifice of Jackson along side UUs Rev. James Reeb and Viola Liuzzo in the memorial plaque that hangs in their Boston headquarters.
That only stepped up pressure on Congress, where despite a
fierce last line of resistance by Southern Democrats, a filibuster
was broken, and the measure passed the upper chamber on May
26. The vote was 77-19 with 47 Democrats in favor, 17 opposed and
30 Republicans—who still were proud to be the party of Lincoln—in
favor and 2 opposed.
Delaying tactics and attempts at gutting the measure by amendment
slowed action in the House of
Representatives but it passed
with minor amendments on a vote of 333-85 when
Congress reconvened from the Independence
Day recess on July 9. A Conference Committee reconciliation of the two versions
cleared the House on August 3 and the Senate the next day.
Johnson wasted no time scheduling a signing ceremony for August 6, just allowing enough time for major
Civil Rights figures including King and Rosa
Parks to attend.
No comments:
Post a Comment