Men arrested at Mrs. Clap's Molly House and others hung in a public execution at Tyburn in 1726. |
On
May 9, 1726 five unfortunate patsies were
strung up and publicly hanged on the notorious
gallows at Tyburn, the rural execution spot not far outside
the walls of London. Or it may have been just three. Accounts differ. Confusion may have arisen because the busy gibbet often accommodated several
hangings at once and there may have been other common criminals dangled with them.
A woodblock print purporting shows
the execution shows seven victims.
At
the time hanging was a popular public
amusement regularly drawing large
crowds of witnesses.
The list of capital crimes was
long and included not just murder and
highway robbery but such petty crimes as pickpocketing or pilfering an
apple from a greengrocer. Twelve
year olds were routinely snuffed out
for lifting a
gentleman’s handkerchief.
The
crime of these particular chaps was sodomy,
a capital felony under the Buggery Act 1533. They were among 40 men plus the proprietor swept up in a raid on Mother Clap’s Molly house on a February
Sunday evening. Margaret Clap operated a coffee
house out of her home in Field Lane,
Holborn, near the Bunch o’ Grapes tavern
The modest
establishment, which Mrs. Clap had opened two years earlier, was supposedly
also a Molly house—an establishment
that catered to homosexual men. Several had been operating in and near London
since about 1700 discretely but openly despite the sodomy laws.
Unlike
most such places Mrs. Claps was neither a tavern nor did it serve as a bordello providing prostitutes for its customers.
She made her large parlor and
several rooms available for the entertainment
and amusement of her clients and beds were available in every
room. There was much gayety, dancing, singing,
and petting in the common room with men frequently pairing up to be “married” in the smaller rooms, sometimes with doors left open so others could watch the proceedings. Since she had no license as a pub, Mrs. Clap would frequently have to
leave her home to visit the Bunch o’ Grapes
to obtain libations for her
guests.
Mrs.
Clap seems to have been genuinely fond of
her clientele and tended to their needs and desires with great solicitousness, going above and beyond the attention of a mere businesswoman. She often extended small loans to some customers and once let one regular who had been thrown out of his home by an irate wife and was homeless lodge in one of
her rooms for a year and a half. Even
while she was being held herself in Newgate
prison she evidently arranged an alibi
that got one of the men arrested in the raid off the hook. For their part
many of the men returned the affection and tried as much as possible to defend her in their testimony to the court. They called her in fondness Mother Clap. She may have been what was in the parlance of 1970’s queer slang, a fag hag.
Gentlemen of quality like this Army officer did play cross dressing games and more hoity-toity Molly houses like Miss Muffs in fashionable Whitechapel, but probably seldom visited the more humble digs offered by Mrs. Clap.
As
for her clientele, she served and welcomed
all classes but most of the men were local artisans, tradesmen, farmers,
and laborers as well urchin street prostitutes who they sometimes
brought with them. There may have been occasional slumming gentlemen if any
were caught up in the raid, their connections
and wealth soon procured a swift, discreet release without charges.
Despite
this, popular illustrations
published after the Molly house raids usually depicted clients as
gentlemen—often as Army officers, judges, and high churchmen. Whatever might have been the case in some Molly
houses in or on the fringes of fashionable districts instead of on
the virtual outskirts of London, Mrs.
Clap does not seem to have entertained these sorts. The pictures, however, played into the common perception of many ordinary Britons that the elite ruling classes were riddled with homosexuality. Which, of
course, was quite true.
Convivial gatherings apparently
occurred on any evening, but evidently Sunday nights were especially popular
and may have amounted to weekly parties. Authorities were aware of that. They had the
establishment under surveillance for
more than a year and coerced a client to turn informer to introduce a police
agent into the scene.
Actually,
police agent is a misnomer. There was no
police department that we would recognize and would not be for more than
a century the Bow Street Runners,
bailiffs of the court who exercised arrest warrants were
consolidated with local constables by
Sir Robert Peel in 1829 as the Metropolitan Police—the Bobbies of Scotland Yard.
Instead,
the investigation and raid were conducted by the Society for the Reformation
of Manners, a private organization
of zealous reformers out to erase the libertinism that had
established itself in London during the Restoration period. The organization enjoyed support
at the highest levels of society and government up to and
including the new Hanoverian Dynasty represented by King George I.
Acting in a quasi-official manner,
the Society employed its own “constables” and an army of spies and informants who conducted investigations, raids, and pressed
prosecutions in its own name.
The Society recruited an informant named Mark Partridge who was enraged at
having been revealed as a homosexual in
previous investigations and blamed his former companions and lovers. Partridge identified several Molly houses,
including the one maintained by Mrs. Clap, to the society and then introduced
one of their constable/agents into the houses as his “husband.” Notes and testimony by the agent, Samuel Stevens became key in the future
prosecutions and provided sensational
accounts in newspapers, broadsides,
and penny pamphlets. For
instance, he wrote in his report to the Society:
I found between 40
and 50 Men making Love to one another, as they call’d it. Sometimes they would
sit on one another’s Laps, kissing in a lewd Manner, and using their Hands
indecently. Then they would get up, Dance and make Curtsies, and mimick the
voices of Women. O, Fie, Sir! – Pray, Sir. – Dear Sir. Lord, how can you
serve me so? – I swear I’ll cry out. – You’re a wicked Devil. – And you’re a
bold Face. – Eh ye little dear Toad! Come, buss! – Then they’d hug, and
play, and toy, and go out by Couples into another Room on the same Floor, to be
marry’d, as they call’d it.
Armed
with such intelligence, the raid in
February snared 40 men, but none were caught in flagrante delicto
which complicated the prosecution on the capital crime of sodomy. At most some were found with breaches unbuttoned or wearing snatches of
women’s clothing.
To obtain convictions, the society had to rely on
the testimony of two turn-coat
informants, both petty criminals
and likely prostitutes, Thomas Newton and Edward
Courtney who had already been used as “queer-bait
and agents provocateurs or entrappers.” One or both of them testified to participating in sexual acts with all of those sentenced to hang and others who were
sentenced to prison and the pillory.
As
the trial progressed there became some publish
backlash for using the testimony of
such disreputable characters as the sole evidence of actual sodomy. That especially was the case for 43 year old Gabriel Lawrence, a milk peddler and widower with a teenage
daughter who was able to produce many witnesses to his good character and that no one other than Newton and Courtney had
ever been the recipient of any advances.
Lawrence admitted to drinking at Mrs. Claps regularly with a friend, Henry Yoxam the cow keeper who supplied him and several Molly houses with milk, but
adamantly proclaimed his innocence of any indecencies. None the less,
he was sentenced to hang.
With
outrage for the witch hunt growing, prosecutors quietly declined to
press charges against those who had not already either bought their way out of
trouble or been freed for lack of evidence.
That
did not include Mrs. Clap herself. When
she was finally brought before the bar she pled innocent to
the charge of keeping a
disorderly house. She told the jury “I hope it will be consider’d that I am a Woman, and therefore
it cannot be thought that I would ever be concern’d in such Practices.” She was convicted anyway and harshly
sentenced for the offense—“to stand in the pillory in Smithfield,
to pay a fine of 20 marks, and to
suffer two years’ imprisonment.”
She
never survived to serve her prison sentence.
She was so grievously mistreated
by a mob at the pillory—probably pelted with stones and beaten with sticks—that she collapsed three times and had to be carried away insensible. She
probably died of her injuries within hours or days, although no record of her passing has been found. She simply vanished to official history.
This
grisly and unfortunate tale is a useful
counter to a somewhat fashionable
claim made by some current historians
that prior to the 20th Century there
was no Gay culture and homosexuality as we understand it did
not exist. They don’t deny that there were
individuals who engaged in homosexual acts or relationships, but maintain that
society viewed them differently and that so did the individuals whether the
acts were suppressed or winked at. But modern observers will quickly note the
characteristics of a well established gay culture in this story—a common code slang, conventions, safe-space
gathering spots, role playing, and cross
dressing. Similar establishments and
cultures established themselves in large
urban centers where there was some
sense of anonymity and a certain critical
mass of population. Like the bathhouses of the ‘60’ and’70’s and the bars, clubs, and discos of
today, the Molly houses thrived in a
culture with a modicum of
tolerance and then became rallying
points of resistance in times of repression.
The
story of Mrs. Clap’s Molly house has become foundational to modern
British gay culture. It has been
told and retold in novels, poems, histories and recently in an avant-garde
stage musical, Mother Clap’s Molly House by Mark Ravenhill.
No comments:
Post a Comment