On August 18, 1587 Virginia Dare was
born on Roanoke Island, one of the Outer Bank Islands
off the coast of what is now North Carolina in
a fledgling colony
underwritten by adventurer Sir Walter Raleigh.
Her mother Eleanor was one
of 17 women who had made the
hazardous Atlantic
crossing and was the daughter of the man assigned by Raleigh
to establish the colony, John White.
And that is all we really know about her.
When her grandfather made his long delayed return to the settlement
exactly three years later on August 18, 1590, he discovered the settlement abandoned with no sign of a struggle.
In fact the palisade and buildings had been carefully dismantled, indicating a planned move. A Maltese cross
that was supposed to be carved on a
designated tree as a distress signal
in case the colonists had to flee
hostile natives was not in evidence.
The only
other clue to the fate of the
inhabitants was the word Croatoan carved
into a post of the fort and “Cro” carved into a nearby tree. Croatoan was
the name of a local tribe of southern Algonquin speakers
with whom friendly relations had
been established in earlier attempts to found the colony. Their main village known to the English was
on another barrier island, but the crew of
the privateer
on which White had hitched a ride
refused to continue the search for them.
White had to
return to England with no knowledge of the fate of his colony, daughter and
granddaughter. Subsequent attempts
to locate the survivors—if there were any—or to find any evidence of their fate
turned up only rumor and speculation.
The fate of
the Lost Colony
of Roanoke and of young Virginia Dare became one of the great mysteries of American history and the basis of countless myths, tall tales, and what we today would call conspiracy theories.
The dashing privateer and favorite of Queen Elizabeth was granted a charter for a colony on the understanding that she would be cut in for a share of his pirate loot. |
The short
lived colony had its origins in a favor
granted by Queen
Elizabeth I to a court favorite,
the dashing and handsome Raleigh, just the type to catch the Virgin Queen’s eye.
She granted him a Charter
to establish a colony in the lands north of Spanish Florida
which had been designated as Virginia.
The Charter required that Raleigh establish a permanent colony within ten years
or lose his rights.
Raleigh intended his proposed colony to trade with the natives and hopefully
find gold or silver, but primarily to establish a base from which privateers could prey upon rich Spanish
shipping. In other words it was to become a base for gentlemen pirates willing to cut the Queen in on their loot.
Although he did not go personally to Virginia, Raleigh
wasted no time in establishing his claim. In 1584 he dispatched Phillip Amadas and Arthur Barlowe to
explore the east coast for likely
locations. They returned with a recommendation for the Outer Banks
islands, whose sheltered waters would
be ideal for launching adventures against the Spanish. They had also
established relations with the Croatoan who they described as friendly.
The
following year Raleigh sent Sir Richard
Grenville with a party of all male
colonizers made up mainly of soldiers
who had recently campaigned in Ireland.
The martial make-up of this group betrayed its intentions.
Unfortunately, most of the colony’s provisions
were ruined when the main ship ran into a reef and sprang a leak. Worse, while
exploring the mainland shore they encountered non-Croatoan natives who they
accused of stealing a sliver goblet.
In retaliation the men sacked and burned the village and executed
the local chief by burning him. This earned the natural enmity of many natives.
Despite
these problems Grenville decided to leave a skeleton colony of 75 men under Ralph Lane on
the north end of Roanoke Island to enforce Raleigh’s claim. He set sail
with bulk of his men for England with a promise to return with reinforcements and provisions. The promise relief date of April 1586 came and
went without a sign of Grenville.
When Sir Francis Drake,
on his way back to England after successfully
plundering the Caribbean
happened upon them in June, they eagerly
accepted his offer a ride back
to England. Grenville’s re-supply expedition arrived soon after to find
the little colony abandoned. Frustrated Grenville left a handful of men
and returned to report the failure.
A map of Roanoke Island with a circle palisade protecting a ring of huts taken from John White's accounts. |
Next time
Raleigh sent 117 settlers, including women and children under the command of
his good friend White, an artist who had been on both of the
earlier voyages and knew the area. White got his colony off to a good start. He re-established relations with the
friendly Croatoan, but was rebuffed
by the mainland tribes still angry over Lane’s depredations. They killed
one settler as he was crabbing
alone in Albemarle
Sound. Fearing for their safety should the mainland tribes attack,
the colonists persuaded White to return with the ship that brought them to beg
for reinforcements and protection.
The series
of unforeseen circumstances that would so long delay White’s return began with
the late season crossing which was beset by gales. The ship’s pilot
declared that it had barely survived to reach port. After White hastily
gathered supplies and men, the Captain refused to make an even more dangerous
winter crossing back. Come spring the threat of the Spanish Armada caused
every sea-worthy ship in England to
be impressed into service.
White found two small coastal ships
considered unfit for naval use.
But their captains decided to try their hand a privateering along the way and
got captured by the Spanish, who confiscated their supplies but allowed
them to return empty to England.
The war with Spain kept White from mounting another expedition.
In
desperation in the spring of 1590 he signed on a privateer planning to raid in
the Caribbean whose captain promised to stop by Roanoke on the trip back to
England. White would come nearly
empty handed, but he would come. And be bitterly disappointed.
Theories about the fate of the vanished colonists have led to wild speculation over the years.
At one point it was suggested that the Mandan, a tribe on the upper Missouri with
whom Lewis and
Clark over-wintered in 1803,
were the decedents of the Roanoke people based on their pale complexions in comparison
to other natives and the presence of some people among them with blue eyes. Other lost “white” tribes were reported, or
rumored across the east from as far north as Maine to the
swamps of Florida.
And there
were occasional possible sightings
of survivors or descendants. In 1609 settlers from Jamestown
relayed reports at that “four men and a
maid” were living among the Iroquoian
speaking Tuscarora,
likely the hostile mainland tribe
that Lane encountered. But Chief Wahunsunacock,
known to history as Powhatan
allegedly told Jamestown’s Captain John Smith that
he had wiped out the survivors
shortly before near modern day Hampton Roads because
they were living with a people who refused to join his growing confederacy.
He allegedly showed Smith English made
iron trinkets to prove his story.
Yet another story tells of early settlers in Person County, North Carolina years later encountering fair skinned natives who spoke some English and had knowledge of
“our Lord, Jesus Christ.”
Most scholars, however believe this group was an offshoot of the Saponi people who may have encountered—and slept with—English privateers or other visiting seamen.
Other
theories, not widely credenced, are
that the settlers used wood from their dismantled village to build boats for an ill-advised and doomed
attempt to reach England on their own or that they were found and massacred by the Spanish.
Most scholars today believe that they were either absorbed by the friendly Croatoan or captured and enslaved by
the Tuscarora.
The fraudulent grave marker of Virginia Dare, one of 48 stone allegedly carved by her mother and scattered over two states. |
Between 1937 and 1941, 48 stones were found around the Carolinas and Northern Georgia supposedly carved by Virginia Dare’s
mother, Eleanor, as documentation of
the colonists movements and subsequent deaths. These stones purportedly
told the story of how the colonists, including Virginia and her father Ananias, were killed by “savages”, and plead for whoever found them to exact
revenge on their perpetrators.
For a time, the stones were thought by
many to be authentic, but have been discredited by modern science and now
only get attention from those notoriously
sensational and unreliable History Channel “documentaries.”
In 1998 some
confirmation of the theory that they lived among the Croatoan was uncovered by archeologists from
East Carolina
University who found a gold 16th
century English signet ring, gun flints, and two 16th century copper farthings
at the site of the ancient Croatoan capital, 50 miles from the colony.
The ring has been identified with Master Kendall
who is recorded as having lived in the Ralph Lane colony on Roanoke Island from
1585 to 1586. But they don’t
provide a link to the later colony and could have been acquired by trade.
Some believe
that the ongoing Lost
Colony DNA Project founded by a group led by Roberta Estes in
2005, will solve the mystery by doing DNA testing of long residents of the area who claim Native American ancestry and whose families have long lived near
Croatoan or other known sites. They also plan to trace family names in the area, some of which correspond to names
found among the Roanoke settlers. They are attempting to re-construct possible family lines.
A web site seeking volunteer from people connected to a long list of family
names to be genetically tested went up in 2007 but I have found no reports of
progress or results. But if the research has not sputtered out, maybe, just maybe they will find a descendant of Virginia Dare.
Do you have a bibliography for this? I am searching for the citations so I can quote the most accurate evidence. Thanks. This is all fascinating. Appreciate your information.
ReplyDeleteSorry Natasha, these history posts are not meant as scholarly papers. Unless I have a strong background and books in my library like in labor history, American political history, poetry, and a few other areas, they are researched quickly on line using Google searches. I often start at Wikipedia, but do not totally rely on it. Most of their articles have some bibliographic notes. I also find articles from various history journals, popular magazines, and sometimes book excerpts. But I do daily entries and don't have the time to keep records of all sources. The purpose of these is to interest and introduce non-specialist readers to historical topics.
Delete