The International Day of Non-Violence honors Gandhi's legacy. |
Did you know October 2 is the International Day of Non-Violence? Neither did I until stumbled on the information during my daily scrounging for something—any damn thing—to write about. My first thought was that it is such a good idea that it is no wonder it is obscure.
It’s one of those United Nations observances. Right away that makes it deeply suspect here in good
ol’ U.S.A. where a huge chunk of the
population is convinced that UN
black helicopters supported by the minions
Barak Hussein Obama are poised to
swoop down and rip the guns from
the hands of patriots. But other UN holidays get better press even here—International
Women’s Day, International Children’s Day, the International Day of Indigenous Peoples—to name a few examples.
Maybe it’s because it is still pretty new and hasn’t had a chance to catch on—it was first
observed in 2008 after being adopted General
Assembly on June 15, 2007.
Apparently the ambassadors of
several countries were asleep. After all protest—even non-violent
protest—is not popular with a
wide range of dictatorships and or
with oligarchies posing as democracies. It’s law
breaking and anarchy to most
governments and only to be encouraged
in the realms of one’s enemies. Take the U.S. which got giddy in support
of various color coded non-violent revolutions where the old Soviet Union held sway or about Arab Springs, but shovels riot gear and arms to dozens of repressive
regimes when those being repressed are on our own shit list.
Around the world non-violent protest is often met by brutal state repression. |
And in an era of militarized police, free speech zones, the
general criminalization of dissent,
and FBI/NSS coordination of local law enforcement suppression of
the Occupy movement, spying on Black Lives Matter protests and organizers, and alleged Free
Speech Zones safely caged away from
political conventions and campaign rallies, it is pretty clear that there is no commitment to respecting non-violent
protest at home, either.
Iranian Nobelist Shirin Ebadi. |
The very origins of the UN observance are, after all, suspect.
In 2003 Shirin Ebadi an Iranian
lawyer, a former judge, human rights activist, founder
of Defenders of Human Rights Center
in Iran, and Nobel Peace Prize Laureate met an Indian teacher, Akshay Bakaya in Paris. Bakaya brought her an
idea that he said originated with his students—an
international observance honoring non-violence as a tool for social change tied
in some way to its greatest modern
proponent, Mahatma Gandhi.
On January 30, 2004 while in Bombay, India for the World Social Forum, Ebadi first
proposed that the date, also the anniversary
of Gandhi’s assassination by Hindi extremists in 1948 be designated as an international day of
non-violence.
Bishop Desmond Tutu. |
In tandem with South African
Anglican Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Ebadi reiterated the proposal at the Satyagraha Conference at Delhi but changed the proposed date to
October 2, Gandhi’s birthday which
already was an Indian celebration
known as Gandhi Jayanti. The conference had been cosponsored by Tutu
and Sonia Gandhi, President of the
Indian National Congress Party. The
term satyagraha was coined and developed
by Mahatma Gandhi and translates as insistence
on truth or soul force. It is a philosophy and practice within the broader
idea of non-violent resistance.
With the support of the ruling
Congress Party, India brought the idea to the U.N. General Assembly, which acted
with unusual speed adopting the proposal on June 15 of the same year. The resolution
called on member states to
commemorate October 2 in “an appropriate manner and disseminate the message of
non-violence, including through education and public awareness.”
The first year celebration was
marked by the issuance of a postal
cachet by the United Nations Postal
Administration in New York City which
was used on all outgoing U.N. mail between October 2 and 31 of that year.
Since then celebrations in most countries
outside of India and South Africa have been, at best, muted.
Perhaps that is because the
Non-Violence promoted by the commemoration is not just a sort of vague warm fuzzy pacifism, but an active strategy for social change.
The U.N. puts it this way:
One
key tenet of the theory of non-violence is that the power of rulers depends on
the consent of the population, and non-violence therefore seeks to undermine
such power through withdrawal of the consent and cooperation of the populace.
There are three main categories of
non-violence action:
protest and persuasion, including
marches and vigils;
non-cooperation; and
non-violent intervention, such as
blockades and occupations.
Gee, that sounds like the last thing most regimes want to happen.
Maybe today is a good day to dust off this neglected celebration….in the streets. Seems to me
we have plenty of reasons to do it….
No comments:
Post a Comment