Showing posts with label Heresy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heresy. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 24, 2022

The Toleration Act as Far as it Went—Not Very Far at All

 

King William shown giving his assent to the Act of Toleration.  His wife and co-monarch Queen Mary concurred.

All-in-all it sounded like a much bigger deal than it was when on May 24 William and Mary gave their joint Royal Assent to England’s Act of Toleration of 1689.  The act gave relief from persecution to a narrow set of exclusively Protestant dissenters—including Puritans, Baptists, and some Quakers.  Such largess was not extended to Catholics, Jews, non-Trinitarians, and atheists—a term applied to virtually no one we would recognize as godless today, but to a great many folks with unorthodox religious scruples

To even become eligible to stop being subject to arrest, imprisonment, and at least theoretically, execution by being burnt at the stake as heretics, nonconformists had to pledge an Oath of Allegiance to the monarchy and an Oath of Supremacy acknowledging the monarch as Supreme Governor of the Church of England as well as reject the Doctrine of Transubstantiation. This obviously excluded Catholics, but many Protestant dissenters, including most Quakers, eschewed oaths or had other objections.

                                        The cover for the official publication of the Toleration Act.

Those who signed on the dotted line could cease looking over their shoulders for the sheriff and were even given leave to worship, but not in homes—who knew what kind of heresy might be preached in small gatherings behind the sanctity of the English home?  Their buildings could not be called churcheschapel or meetinghouse were the preferred terms—nor could the building have a bell tower or steeple.  Preachers had to be vetted for orthodox opinions and licensed by the state

Moreover, individual adherents of Dissenting sects were still banned from holding any public office, attending universities, and even testifying in certain court cases.  And, of course, they were subject to taxation in support of the established church.

Dissenters' Chapels or Meetinghouses were forbidden to have towers or steeples or most of the characteristics of a church building.  Like this early one in the market town of Devizes, Wiltshire.

The last person actually executed for heresy was the unfortunate dissenting clergyman Edward Wightman way back in 1612.  The Church of England and Protestants had become less concerned with each other than being united in opposition to the Papists who were seen as an existential threat not only to the established Church but to the monarchy.  William and Mary had come to the joint throne earlier the same year from the Netherlands in the Glorious Revolution as Protestant rulers to prevent the return of Catholic Stewarts.  They and Parliament hoped that the symbolic toleration of Protestant dissidents would solidify their rule.

Influential Enlightenment philosopher John Locke had been advocating for just such toleration for years.  But now it was especially politically expedient.

A woodcut portrait of the unfortunate Edinburgh student who was the last person executed for blasphemy in Great Britain in 1697.  His case has inspired poetry, plays, and even a musical. 

Under the Act perhaps some dissenters were safe from the lingering threat of the horrors of the flames and the stake.  But apparently a cheeky schoolboy still had plenty to worry.  In 1697 Thomas Aikenhead was a 20 year old Edinburgh student who with the swaggering bravado of many a young man, and a tongue likely oiled by the Scottish national beverage, was overheard making shocking statements to his friends. To wit:

…that theology was a rhapsody of ill-invented nonsense, patched up partly of the moral doctrines of philosophers, and partly of poetical fictions and extravagant chimeras: That he ridiculed the holy scriptures, calling the Old Testament Ezra’s fables, in profane allusion to Esop’s Fables; That he railed on Christ, saying, he had learned magick in Egypt, which enabled him to perform those pranks which were called miracles: That he called the New Testament the history of the imposter Christ; That he said Moses was the better artist and the better politician; and he preferred Muhammad to Christ: That the Holy Scriptures were stuffed with such madness, nonsense, and contradictions, that he admired the stupidity of the world in being so long deluded by them: That he rejected the mystery of the Trinity as unworthy of refutation; and scoffed at the incarnation of Christ.

…Or so read the indictment against him for blasphemy drawn up by the zealous Lord Advocate, Sir James Stewart, who demanded the death penalty to set an example to others who might otherwise express such opinions in the future.  The boy refused to recant and a court convicted and sentenced him. 

The case was appealed to the Privy Council where two members of the Court and two prominent ministers begged for mercy on account of the defendant’s tender age.  The Council declined to commute the sentence unless the Church of Scotland would intercede on his behalf.  Not only did the church refuse, but its General Assembly also urged “vigorous execution” to curb “the abounding of impiety and profanity in this land.”

At the appointed time the lad was taken from jail where upon he delivered a fine speech that may have been a semi-recantation and was taken to the gallows to be swung.  “the preachers who were the poor boy’s murderers crowded round him at the gallows, and…insulted heaven with prayers more blasphemous than anything he had uttered,” according to Thomas Macaulay’s much later account.

Aikenhead’s death was a testimony to how hollow Toleration could be.  He may have been the last to be sent to the gallows for blasphemy, but plenty more would rot in prison for it.  The last would be John William Gott of the Freethought Socialist League who served the last of several sentences with 9 months at hard labor in 1922.  Yes, you read that right, 1922.  The harsh conditions of his final imprisonment broke his health and he died at the age of 56 shortly after his release.

But back to the days and years after the Act.  It affected the far off North American Colonies.  Perhaps nowhere more significantly than in New England.  The virtual Puritan theocracy there saw that the act gave some relief to their English cousins.  But they had always vigorously persecuted any deviation from their own Standing Order.  Baptist Roger Williams was driven out to establish Rhode IslandAnne Hutchinson, her family and allies were banished in 1637 and she had to make a nearly fatal 40 mile trek through virtual wilderness to join Williams.  Mary Dyer and her family were allies of Hutchinson and were also banished.  But Mary returned to England where she met William Fox and became a Quaker preacher.  She boldly returned to Boston, where the pious authorities were glad to hang her and three other Quakers in 1660.

Boston Puritans were happy to hang young Quaker Mary Dyer and two of her co-religionists.  Illustrator Howard Pyle painted her been marched to her doom in a public spectacle.

Now, under the Act of Toleration, Protestant dissidents were finally given some measure of freedom in the New England colonies.  Not, however, Catholics who remained in danger.

Naturally Rhode Island and William Penn’s Pennsylvania went further than the Act required and forbad any established religion.  They were joined by neighboring New Jersey and Delaware.  But only Pennsylvania extended toleration to Catholics.  In Maryland, the proprietary colony of Catholic Lord Baltimore, Anglican settlers had swamped his first Catholic settlement and upon gaining the upper hand in the Assembly had promptly disenfranchised the “bloody Papists.”

Virginia Anglicans refused to acknowledge that the Toleration Act applied to the Established Church of the Commonwealth and continued to harass, assault, jail, and fine dissenters.  Here a mob dunks to Baptist Preachers found conducting an open air worship.  As a result Baptists became one of the leading proponents of both religious toleration and strict separation of Church and State.

In Virginia the haughty planters who controlled the government refused to recognize that the Act of Toleration applied to them.  They rallied to the support of the Anglican clergy who demanded the persecution of rapidly spreading dissenting sects, particularly the pesky Baptists.  Baptist preachers were assaulted and arrested, open air meetings were rousted by the militia, homes invaded to prevent private services.  The persecution continued for decades, as did appeals by the Baptists for relief.  Despite numerous attempts and the support of some members of the elite who were schooled in the Scottish Enlightenment, Virginia failed to extend protections to the Baptists and others right up to the American Revolution

Thomas Jefferson, shown in an official Presidential portrait years after the fact, considered the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom in 1777 as one of his greatest achievements.

A sympathetic Thomas Jefferson and his allies would finally rectify matters with the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom in 1777.  Jefferson’s ally James Madison would ensure that religious liberty and the Separation of Church and State were enshrined in the new Constitution.

Back in the Mother Country a long list of reform acts slowly, excruciatingly slowly, widened what passed for religious freedom.  Here is a list to give you some idea.

The Papists Act of 1778—Allowed some Catholics who would make oaths of loyalty to the Crown and reject claims of Pretenders to hold some public offices, inherit or purchase landPerpetual imprisonment for keeping school was abolished and the persecution of Catholic clergy lifted.

Roman Catholic Relief Act 1791—Admitted Catholics to the practice of law, permitted the exercise of their religion, and the existence of their schools.  Chapels, schools, officiating priests, and teachers were to be registered; assemblies with locked doors, as well as steeples and bells to chapels, were forbidden; priests were not to wear their robes or to hold service in the open air; children of Protestants were not to be admitted to their schools; monastic orders and endowments of schools and colleges were prohibited.

Doctrine of the Trinity Act 1813—Extended the protections of the Act of Toleration of 1689 to Unitarians on the same basis as other Protestants.

Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829—Allowed Catholics to be elected to Parliament and most Crown offices.

Roman Catholic Charities Act of 1832—Extended the protection of the Act of Toleration to Catholic schools, places of worship, education, and charities.

Religious Disabilities Act 1846Ended most remaining restrictions on Catholics for education, charities, and property although Oxford, Cambridge, and Durham Universities were allowed to ban Catholics.

Jews, once driven from the Kingdom, did not receive protections under the Toleration Act until 1858 during the reign of Queen Victoria.

Jews Relief Act 1858—Extended the protection of the Act of Toleration to Jewish schools, places of worship, education, and charities.

Places of Worship Registration Act 1855—Offered an optional system of registration for non-Anglican places of worship was passed which gave certain legal and fiscal advantages for those that registered, and finally held that “alternative religion was not only lawful, but was often facilitated by the law.”

University Tests Act 1871—Allowed Oxford, Cambridge and Durham Universities to admit Catholics and allow them on their faculties.

Promissory Oaths Act 1871Repealed most, but not all, of the remaining restrictive clauses of the Act of Toleration.

Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1969—Repealed the final remaining provisions of the Toleration Act.

Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008—abolished the common law offenses of blasphemy and blasphemous libel in England and Wales.  Blasphemy remains a criminal offense in Scotland.

Intercommunal religious violence is still a problem in the United Kingdom particularly attacks on Muslims and Jews and occasional attacks by Muslims on perceived Christians.  In 2015 this peace and unity march was led by Jewish, Muslim, Anglican, and other clergy.

The Church of Scotland—Presbyterian—is a “National Church but not a State Church.”  The Anglican Church of Ireland was disestablished as a State Church by the Irish Church Act 1869.  The Anglican Church in Wales was disestablished by the Welsh Church Act 1914.  But the Church of England remains the state church there with Queen Elizabeth II as its official head.

Friday, December 23, 2016

Johann Sylvan—Forgotten Martyr of Unitarianism

Johann Sylvan losing his head for unitarianism.


We Unitarian Universalists tend to pump up our martyrs.  The Catholics have so many martyr saints, that they can barely keep track and just to keep the liturgical calendar from being overrun by them, periodically jettisons a bunch of unused or questionable ones.  
The Protestants have plenty, too, which they are eager to pin on the bloody Papists.  And the Jews, don’t get me started!  They have 6 million or so in just one sitting!  How to compete with that?
By contrast we have just a handful who have paid the ultimate price for their religious convictions, and several more who took it in the shorts for standing up for justice.  The big name, of course is Michael Servetus who got himself burned at the stake in Geneva by John Calvin himself.  Francis David rotted to death in a dank prison.  Norbert Capek met his end in a Nazi extermination camp alongside some of those Jews. Some English radical dissenters met unpleasant ends.  As far as I can tell, no American or Canadian ever was killed for just being a Unitarian or a Universalist.   But maybe I missed something. Our martyrs are from the Civil Rights MovementRev. James Reeb and Viola Liuzzo, abortion clinic escort Col. James Barrett, or the worshipers at our Knoxville congregation shot in a mass shooting episode.
So it was interesting to discover a real unitarian (small u) martyr I had never heard of.
Johann Sylvan had his head severed from his body on December 23, 1572 in Heidelberg.   Unlike Servetus, he had recanted his heretical anti-trinitarianism in hopes of mercy.  Fat lot of good it did him.
Sylvan was a Lutheran preacher who rose from humble origins to prestigious pulpits and a reputation as a leading theologian.  At the time traditional Lutheranism was coming under pressure from more radical reformers, including the followers of Calvin.  Sylvan drifted into the Reform camp although Lutheranism remained the state religion.

Sylvan's patron and protector Frederick II, Elector Palatine of the Rhine.

But the reformers had powerful allies in high places.  Among them was Frederick III, Elector Palatine of the Rhine, the local ruler within the feeble Kingdom of Germany and the still Catholic Holy Roman Empire.  Eventually he proclaimed Reform.
Fredrick named Sylvan to his personal service and named him the posts of pastor and church superintendent of Kaiserslautern.  He did diplomatic service for the princeling in the Netherlands.  By 1567 he had been rewarded the even better job as pastor in Ladenburg.  He was regarded as a leading voice of the Reformers.
Things started to unravel for him the next year when a theological dispute over Church discipline erupted within Calvinist circles. Sylvan became a leader of a faction opposed to the imposition of rigorous disciplineexpulsion from the “body of Christ” over matters of theology open to interpretation.  Rigid Calvinists, including his patron, favored strict application of discipline to squelch inroads of any possible dissension or heresy.
Sylvan was recruited to write a book refuting the Italian anti-trinitarian Giorgio Biandrata but insead fell under the sway of his arguments.

Despite his perilous position on these issues, he was still so highly regarded as a theologian that he was asked to refute a book by the Italian anti-trinitarian Giorgio Biandrata whose work was stirring up un-orthodox sentiments.  Sylvan gamely accepted the assignment, confident that he could quickly demolish the heretic’s arguments.  Instead, he found that he could not.  He could find no evidence supporting the Trinity in the Gospels.
Deeply troubled, he did further reading and even took the radical step of consulting with a famed Jewish scholar, Immanuel Tremellius, who assured him that there was no basis in Hebrew texts either.  This consultation laid him open to accusations of being a Judaizer.
The fatal book.
Sylvan joined a secret anti-trinitarian cell that included other leading Reform dissidents, Adam Neuser, Matthias Vehe-Glirius, Jakob Suter, and Johann Hasler. In 1570 he drafted a manifesto entitled True Christian Confession of the Ancient Faith of the One True God and of Messiah Jesus of the True Christ, against the Three-Person Idol and the Two-Natured False Deity of the Antichrist.
Sylvan and his compatriots knew that when the treatise got out, their lives would be in jeopardy.   He and Neuser wrote to the prince of Transylvania, where the world’s first Unitarian church was flourishing.  But already under suspicion, the letter was intercepted.  Neuser was able to escape, but Sylvan was arrested.
His old sponsor, Frederick III, had died and his heir and son Louis VI had restored Lutheranism as the religion of state.  A Lutheran court proved to be no more merciful than a Calvinist one.  Despite recanting, Sylvan was condemned.  Mercifully, he was executed by being beheaded by the stroke of a broadsword, instead of being burned, a la Servetus.
On the eve of the eve of Christmas, let my fellow Unitarian Universalists take a moment to light a candle for one whom, no matter how reluctantly, gave his life for faith.