Friday, September 4, 2026

Walking the Walk and Compassion for Campers Update for September 4 2026

 

Look for new opportunities for action, education, community, and solidarity in and around McHenry County here every week.  

Walking the Walk




The League of Women Voters of McHenry County is sponsoring a series of County Board District Candidate Events.  The next two events feature County Board Districts 6 and 8 from 1-3 pm SaturdaySeptember 12 at the Nippersink Library, 5418 Hill Road in Richmond and District 5 at the McHenry Library, 809 Front Street, McHenry.  Sunday, Sept 27 from 2-4 pm.

The League is a non-partisan organization dedicated to making democracy work through voter education, issue advocacy and citizen participation.  All candidates for each office were invited, but participation is voluntary and not guaranteed.

The fight to preserve threatened democracy is urgent at all levels of government.  Become an informed voter and the vote your conscience and principles.


Compassion for Campers

The McHenry County Mental Health Board which generously stepped up to offer a temporary home to the McHenry County Resource Center (MCHC) and Compassion for Campers (C4C) over the summer has rented the space to a new tenant effective October 1. After that MCHC must make new arrangements. An active search for a suitable location is under way, preferably in an accessible spot near public transportation options and space for on sight storage, shower and/or laundry facilities would be a plus.

Meanwhile C4C will be at the MCHC site, 620 Dakota Street in Crystal Lake this Friday, September 4, from 10 am to 2 pm and then on Friday, September 18.  Other service providers will be on hand for the last Resource Center event there on Friday, September 24.

Financial support is critical to fulfilling our mission. The best thing you can do is offer your critically needed financial support. Money donations are always welcome at     https://tinyurl.com/3bz96axe.   Look for updates here.  Email compassionforcampers@treeoflifeuu.org .


Mourning Wendell Berry and "The Mad Farmer Revolution"

 

Poet/philosopher/farmer Wendell Berry on his beloved Kentucky farm in 2016.

In a week of high-profile deaths including Dolly Parton, Wendell Berry may not have generated the same buzz, but the loss of his iconic voice struck a deep chord with many.  He died in his home on the farm in Port Royal, Kentucky Monday at the age of 92.  His Associated Press obituary noted, "Few authors were more tied to their home than Berry, an intellectual and spiritual heir to Henry David Thoreau and such Southern agrarians as Robert Penn Warren and John Crowe Ransom.  In prose and poetry that mirrored the uncluttered and deeply felt life he advocated, Berry challenged modern assumptions about prosperity and happiness and renewed the mysteries of birth, love, work and death."

This post is adapted from an Earth Day entry from 2011.

Wendell Berry was born with deep roots in the soil of Henry County, Kentucky in 1934.  His father was a lawyer and tobacco farmer.  Both sides of his family had tilled the local soil for five generations.  After graduating from a local military academy, he attended the University of Kentucky where he decided to become a writer.  He completed his Masters degree there in 1957 and married.  The following year he was named a Wallace Stenger Fellow at Stanford University where he studied under Stenger with Ken Kesey, Larry McMurtry, and other emerging writers. He continued academic pursuits with studies in Europe on a Guggenheim Foundation Fellowship before taking up teaching at New York University’s University College in the Bronx.

While in New York, he completed his first book of poetry, November Twenty Six Nineteen Hundred Sixty Three, a single long poem in ten stanzas as an elegy to John F. Kennedy and national loss.  Later in 1964 he published his first collection, The Broken Ground which explored the themes that would dominate his work, “the cycle of life and death, responsiveness to place, pastoral subject matter, and recurring images of the Kentucky River and the hill farms of north-central Kentucky.”

Berry returned to the University of Kentucky in 1965 to teach creative writing.  He moved in a circle of writers that included Thomas Merton.  He also began farming his property, Lanes Landing, in north central Kentucky on the western bank of the Kentucky River, not far from where it flows into the Ohio.  He grew corn, grain, and maintained a kitchen garden on the land where lived, worked, and wrote.  Much of Berry’s writing—poetry, fiction, and non-fiction was rooted in his experience on the land and in the surrounding community.

Berry left teaching in 1977 to devote himself to farming, writing and activism.  By then he had a major body of work already completed and was being recognized as voice of the emerging environmental movement.  In addition to a regular output of poetry including 26 volumes including chapbooks, short fiction, and essay memoirs of his farming experiences, Berry wrote practical guides to subsistence and small farmers for Rodale Press including Organic Gardening and Farming and The New Farm.  He has also wrote eight novels that together are a chronicle of a fictionalized Kentucky River town, Port William.  This long series has allowed him to trace the complex relationships between the land, the people, and the economic and technological changes that impact them.


                                                        One of Berry's most recent collections of verse.

Berry was a front-line activist not only for environmental causes, but against the Viet Nam War, nuclear energy, land raping mountain top removal coal mining, and against government regulation that threatened to make small scale farming impossible.  Not content with just writing or speaking, Berry frequently led or participated in demonstrations, including civil disobedience.

At age 75 Berry was still active both as a writer and activist.  He was honored with many prizes and awards, most including the National Humanities Medal in 1965.


The Mad Farmer Revolution



Being a Fragment
of the Natural History of New Eden,
in Homage
To Mr. Ed McClanahan, One of the Locals


The mad farmer, the thirsty one,
went dry. When he had time
he threw a visionary high
lonesome on the holy communion wine.
"It is an awesome event
when an earthen man has drunk
his fill of the blood of a god,"
people said, and got out of his way.
He plowed the churchyard, the
minister's wife, three graveyards
and a golf course. In a parking lot
he planted a forest of little pines.
He sanctified the groves,
dancing at night in the oak shades
with goddesses. He led
a field of corn to creep up
and tassel like an Indian tribe
on the courthouse lawn. Pumpkins
ran out to the ends of their vines
to follow him. Ripe plums
and peaches reached into his pockets.
Flowers sprang up in his tracks
everywhere he stepped. And then
his planter's eye fell on
that parson's fair fine lady
again. “O holy plowman,” cried she,
“I am all grown up in weeds.
Pray, bring me back into good tilth.”
He tilled her carefully
and laid her by, and she
did bring forth others of her kind,
and others, and some more.
They sowed and reaped till all
the countryside was filled
with farmers and their brides sowing
and reaping. When they died
they became two spirits of the woods.

On their graves were written
these words without sound:
“Here lies Saint Plowman.
Here lies Saint Fertile Ground.”

—Wendell Berry

    

Thursday, September 3, 2026

Tiny San Marino--A Place of Refuge and the Oldest Republic

 


Perched on the top Monte Titano stand the three fortification towers of Guaita linked by walls and communication trenches, which offer spectacular panoramic views of San Marino.

The story goes like this.  Stone mason and sometimes preacher Marinus of Arba and his life-long pal Leo were forced by some political upheaval to leave their home of Rab, a Roman colony on the island of Arba in the Adriatic Sea off the coast of what is now Croatia.  The two young men settled in the northern Italian city of Rimini to find work reconstructing the city’s ruined walls.  But there they ran afoul of the infamous persecution of Christians ordered by the Emperor Diocletian and had to flee the city. 

At the same time some of Marinus’s sermons as an ordained Deacon were found somehow at odds with the not-yet codified tenets of the Church so he could find no refuge.  The pair fled to the rugged, remote, and unpopulated Apennine Mountains determined to live as monastic hermits equally free of the Emperor and the Pope.  By tradition on September 3, 301 CE Marius began laying the stones of a chapel and the establishment of a monastic community.


A much later German etching depicting Saint Marinus the Stone Cutter building his monastery.

Marinus died many years later in 366 with the words Relinquo vos liberos ab utroque homine—I leave you free from both men—meaning the Emperor and the Pope.  By then his community had grown and prospered and the monastery high on the top of Monte Titano had become a haven for refugees persecuted by both.  It would remain so through the centuries

Eventually Marinus was canonized as San Marino and the community that sprang up around his Hermitage would become known as the Most Serene Republic of San Marino.  The tiny nation, occupying less than 24 square miles, has maintained its independence ever since and celebrates September 3 not only as Marinus’s Feast Day, but as the foundation date of the Republic.

That makes San Marino easily the oldest surviving continuously sovereign state in the world, and because it never came under the rule of even a local nobleman or feudal governance by the Abby, also the oldest Republic.  This was made possible by its isolation, the terrain so rugged that it was said there was hardly a square inch of level ground, location away from traditional trade routes and invasion corridors, sometimes surprising friends in high places, and just plain dumb luck.

In its earliest years San Marino was informally ruled by the hermit monks of Church of St. Agatha on the top of Monte Titan.  This hardly was governance of any meaningful kind.  In the early 400’s with Rome near collapse eight neighboring towns joined with San Marino seeking protection from invading Goths.  These communes became the along with the original settlement became San Marino’s nine municipalities. With the expanded territory and population, the heads of families established themselves as ruling council known as the Arengo which governed from the 5th Century to 1243.  By then it grew to representatives of more than 50 extended families and was a cumbersome body and was riven by feuds and rival cabals

The Sammarinese, as citizens are known, fed up with oligarchic rule established their own Grand and General Council which Pope Innocent IV, the titular head of state, in one of the first acts of his Papacy, recognized as the country’s ruling body.  Every six months the Grand and General Council elected two Captains Regent to co-hold executive power.  They were not eligible for re-election, but could be returned to the position on later occasions.  Traditionally, the pair of Regents were drawn from opposing factions on the Council and since the adoption of a two-party system, from each of the political parties.  This form of governance was molded after the Senate and Consuls of the old Roman Republic.  This arrangement was codified the Leges Statutae Republicae Sancti MariniConstitution of San Marino—recorded in a series of six books written in Latin in the late 1600.  In 1631the Papacy waived its light claims on San Marino and recognized its independence from the Papal States.

                                          
                                                     The Constitution of San Marino was codified and published in 1600.

If maintaining essential independence for nearly 1400 years from the declining years of the Roman Empire, through the Dark Ages, and the Renaissance when intrigue and war spread across the Italian Peninsula as the Papacy, ambitious city states, and various leagues and alliances struggled for supremacy was hard, the challenges of the Napoleonic Era, clash of Empires, and the rise of the European nation state were even more daunting.

In 1797 San Marino’s independence was threatened when Napoleon Bonaparte’s French Army was rampaging through Italy.  Somehow Antonio Onofri, one of the two serving Captains Regent, managed to befriend the General and impress him with his tale of San Marino’s long independence as a republic.  Napoleon at this stage of his career was still an ideologically committed Republican himself.  Not only did he offer to guarantee and protect San Marino’s independence, but he offered to award the country territory from adjacent states.  The grateful Grand and General Council politely refused that off rightly fearing that accepting a land grab would alienate more powerful neighbors and lead to attacks when the French would inevitably eventually leave Italy.

An even greater challenge was the long struggle of Italian Unification that began after the final fall of Napoleon and the Congress of Vienna in 1815 and continued up to the final surrender of the Papal States and the location of a capital at Rome for the Kingdom of Italy.  San Marino began the period completely surrounded by the Papal States.  But in 1859 the rapidly expanding Kingdom of Sardinia extended its borders over Central Italy and San Marino lay astride the border between that Kingdom and the Papal States.  In accordance with its traditions, San Marino became of place of refuge for many fleeing the fighting, but especially for refugees from pro-unification areas.   In December 1860 the Papal province of Marche adjacent to San Marino was incorporated in the Kingdom of Sardinia.


San Marino was often blessed with friends in high places like the great Italian unifier Giuseppe Garibaldi.


That made San Marino an island in an area aflame for unification.  In gratitude and in recognition of the tiny nation’s long resistance to Papal rule, unification leader Giuseppe Garibaldi prevailed upon the soon-to-be King of Italy, Victor Emanuel II who led the Sarndinian-Piedmontese forces which had captured Marche, to respect the traditional independence of San Marino.

San Marino was not immune from its own domestic crisis.  By the turn of the 20th Century the citizenry was restive under the Grand and General Council which became increasingly oligarchic.  In a bold and unusual move in 1906 the Sammarinese Socialist Party agitated for and achieved a call to meeting of the ancient Arengo, where the heads of families, under some public duress, voted to authorize universal manhood suffrage for the first time in elections to the General Council.  The Socialists took advantage of the change to assume leadership of a majority coalition in the Council.  The oligarchs formed a counter-party and bided their time for a chance to resume power.

The eruption of World War I interrupted the internal political struggles and put independence once again at risk.  Italy initially entered the war on the side of Austria-Hungary, honoring old treaty obligations.  Then in May of 1915, Italy changed sides, declaring war on its former ally in hopes gaining territory along the frontier between the countries. San Marino, however, declared its neutrality, which was taken as hostile by Italy which feared that the small state could become a nest of Austrian spies and agents and that the country’s powerful new radio transmitter atop Monte Titano could be used by the enemy.

Italy tried to force the occupation of San Marino by units of the Carabinieri paramilitary police which the Republic refused and resisted.  In retaliation Italy cut San Marino’s telephone lines and established a partial blockade.  The Italians did not, however, invade the country.

Still within San Marino there was some popular support for the Italians.  Small numbers of Sammarinese formed a volunteer unit to fight with the Italians.  Another volunteer group set up a Red Cross field hospital.  This was regarded as hostile by the Austrians who broke diplomatic relations and threatened the country should the front move its way.

The Italians fared poorly in a brutal campaign that turned into retreat and then stalemate.  The Sammarinese once again offered shelter to refugees.

In the aftermath of World War I the old oligarchic faction reorganized under Giuliano Gozi, one of the volunteers with the Italian army and then serving as both Foreign Minister—effectively the leader of the Cabinet—and Interior Minister which put him in control of the Army and police forces.  Gozi founded the Sammarinese Fascist Party, modeled on the Italian Party, in 1922 and used street thugs to intimidate the Socialists and syndicalists—unionists.  In 1923 Gozi was elected the first Fascist Captain Regent.  After 1926 all other parties were banned and until the end of World War II both Captains Regents were Fascist in contradiction to the ancient Constitution. Although San Marino became a single party state, Fascist power was not absolute, and independents continued to hold a majority in the Grand and General Council until 1932.  After that a split in Fascist ranks weakened the Party.

Despite cordial relations with Mussolini and the Italian Fascists, San Marino once again declared its traditional neutrality with the outbreak of a general European War in 1939.  It had already not followed the Italian Party’s lead in adopting Anti-Jewish legislation in 1938.  It had a small, but long-standing Jewish population, and after persecution began in Italy some Jews found refuge in San Marino.  During the war anti-fascist Italian Partisans also occasionally found secret refuge there, although the local Fascists expelled those who were discovered.

In 1940 the New York Times erroneously reported that San Marino had declared war on Britain.  The Sammarinese government scrambled to wire London denying entering the war.  With the fall of Mussolini in Italy in July of 1943 and the subsequent official separate peace with the Allies, the Sammarinese Fascist Party lost power, although they were briefly restored in 1944.  The Fascists reiterated neutrality in April of 1944, but the British bombed the country on June 26 believing it was a repository for military supplies for the Germans.  The government denied allowing munitions of any nation to be stored on its territory. 


I
ndian troops passing the grave of a German soldier.  After they cleared out the Nazis in the Battle of San Marino in 1944 the British withdrew their troops from the tiny nation.

In early September the Germans forcibly occupied the country, the first and only time the country was overrun by a hostile power.  The Germans were already in general retreat in Italy.  On September 17 the 4th Indian Infantry Division attacked the Nazis and ousted them in the brief Battle of San Marino.  After driving the Germans out, the Indians quickly withdrew and left the country in the control of its own armed forces.

The German occupation effectively finished the Fascists as a political force in San Marino.  Multi-party parliamentary government was restored and in 1945 a coalition led by the Communists achieved a majority and ruled until 1957.  It was the first time anywhere in the world that Communists formed an elected government. 

The Grand and General Council was split for years between multiple parties, some of them quite small, a mirror of the situation in Italy.  In 2008 a new election law put restrictions on small parties forcing most of them out of existence or to join coalitions.  There were two main opposing coalitions, the Pact for San Marino, led by the Christian Democratic Party, and the United Left, led by the Party of Socialists and Democrats, a merger of the Socialist Party and the former communist Party of Democrats.  Today the center-right party coalition is the Republica Futura which was formed by fusion of the Popular Alliance (AP) and the Union for the Republic (UPR).  The other side has reformed as the Democratic Socialist Left. The frequent turn-over of Captains Regents has resulted in San Marino having more recognized female heads of state than any other nation in the world—15, including three who served twice.


In April 2017 two women, Mimma Zavoli and Vanessa D'Ambrosio were elected Captains Regent of San Marino.  At age 29 D'Ambrosio was the youngest head of state in the world.

Today San Marino is the smallest member of the Council of Europe but it is not a member of the European Economic Union or the European Parliament.  None-the-less, it is by agreement allowed to use the Euro as currency and as is customary has its own national images printed on the obverse side of notes, most of which are snapped up by collectors. 

With an economy relying heavily on finance, technical services, and tourism, the approximately 35,000 residents enjoy the highest per capita income in Europe and are the only country on the continent with more automobiles than people.  Its citizens are also among the most highly educated in Europe.  Unlike many small nations with substantial finance industries, San Marino does not rely on being a tax shelter.  There is a corporate profits tax rate of 19 percent. Capital gains are subject to a five percent tax, and interest is subject to a 13 percent withholding tax.  Foreigners use San Marino banks for their renowned stability and the high level of technical and personal services.


The Guard of the Rock on parade, one of the major units of the San Marino regular Army.

By agreement Italy is responsible for the general defense of San Marino, but the country maintains a fairly sizable military establishment for its size.  This includes colorful units with largely ceremonial duties including the Crossbow Corps, Guard of the Rock (also a combat unit and border patrol), and Guard of the Council Great and General (which protects the government).  In addition, every family with more than adult two males is required to provide a member of the Company of Uniformed Militia.  Participation is so popular that it is over subscribed.

Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Victory and Humiliation on the ASS Missouri--Japan Surrenders Unconditionally

 

General Douglas MacArthur orchestrated the most humiliating surrender possible for the Japanese Empire and its officer class.

One day after six years of war in Europe began the even longer war in Asia and the Pacific officially ended on September 2, 1945.  On that day General Douglas MacArthur, Supreme Commander of the Allied Southwest Pacific Area (SWPA) ordered members of the Japanese Government and High Command to assemble to sign the formal documents of unconditional surrender.

The Japanese had been at war even longer than their Axis allies, since the 1937 invasion of China or, if you count low grade guerilla resistance, since the 1931 annexation of Manchuria.  For them, particularly the Imperial officer class who had pushed aggressive expansion, the ceremony was an almost unbearable and ignominious occasion. 

The war had begun with such high hopes.  To them it was to be the extension of Japan’s unique high culture to the backwards nations of Asia and a final end to European encroachment and colonization.  And one after the other they defeated and expelled the British, French, Dutch, and Americans from their possessions.  The vaunted Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere would bring Asia to the forefront of the world and, of course, enrich Japan.  The struggle, undertaken for the Emperor, was a divine mission.


The bodies of women, many of them rape victims, and children during the infamous Rape of Nanking, one of the of  the Japanese atrocities that fueled the deep hatred of American and allied troops for their enemies in Asia.

The Japanese conducted their seemingly irresistible advances with a relentless cruelty that shocked the “civilized” world but was totally in keeping with their own traditions and particularly with the Samurai culture as redefined for modern industrial warfare.  The Rape of Nanking was not a trumped-up propaganda ploy as charges of German atrocities in Belgium during World War I had been.  It set the stage for behavior to civilian populations that fell under their control, at least during the period of initial attack and occupation.  The brutal treatment of American and allied prisoners, exemplified by the Bataan Death March was directly due to the contempt the martial culture had for any troops who did not fight “honorably” to the death.

As a result of these depredations, and deeply ingrained Western racism, the war in the East was matched by equal savagery by the Allies.  The Japanese were painted as sub-human in a way that even the Nazis never were.  After some of the most brutal combat in history on all sides the Allies crept to the doorstep of the Home Islands when the U.S. unleashed—twice—a new horror of its own, atomic weapons. 

Faced with what he feared might be the annihilation of his people, the Emperor, against the wishes of many of the same officers assembled on the deck of the USS Missouri, finally ordered the capitulation of the Empire on August 15.


Sailors crowded the decks of the USS Missouri to witness the surrender.

It took until September 2 for MacArthur to orchestrate the final drama.  Holding the ceremony on board the USS Missouri, a battleship that survived the attack on Pearl Harbor emphasized the humiliation.  As did other flourishes like displaying the flag of Commodore Mathew Perrys flag ship from his 1853 mission which forced the reclusive Japanese to open trade with the West.  Also pointedly on hand as official witnesses were General Jonathan Wainwright, who surrendered the Philippines and was on the Bataan Death March, and British General Arthur Percival, who had surrendered Singapore.  MacArthur and other American officers present did not attend in dress uniforms but appeared without jackets or ties in standard duty kakis.  Most Allied officers wore more formal uniforms and full decorations.

The signing ceremony itself was starkly simple and lasted just 23 minutes from start to finish.  The instrument was first signed by the Japanese Foreign Minister Mamoru Shigemitsu and then General Yoshijiro Umezu, Chief of the Army General Staff. MacArthur then signed as the newly designated Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers who would be charged with occupation and governance of the defeated nation.  A parade of officers representing all Allied combatants in the East followed to add their signatures:  Admiral Chester Nimitz, U.S. Navy; General Hsu Yung-Chang, the Republic of China; Admiral Sir Bruce Fraser, United Kingdom; General Kuzma Derevyanko, Soviet Union (which belatedly declared war on Japan only days earlier); General Sir Thomas Blamey, Australia; Colonel Lawrence Cosgrave, Canada; General Philippe Leclerc, France; Admiral C.E.L. Hefrich, the Netherlands; and Air Vice-Marshal Leonard Isitt, New Zealand.

Each signed two copies of the instrument.  The Allied copy was bound in fine leather, lined in gold, and embossed with the seals of the U.S. and Japan.  The Japanese copy was crudely bound in canvas with no seals or ornamentation.

Throughout the ceremony MacArthur never spoke to or even looked directly at his Japanese counterparts.  Afterwards he turned and walked away without shaking hands.  It was over—both the ceremony and, finally, World War II.

Two different days are recognized as V-J Day.  For Britain and most of the rest of the world it is August 15 when the Emperor announced capitulation.  President Harry Truman officially proclaimed September 2 V-J Day for the United States.


Woodstock, Illinois still celebrated VJ Day with a large annual parade and Drum and Bugle Corps festival in 1960.

For several years following the war it was a widely celebrated event.  In Woodstock, Illinois it was the occasion of an annual festival featuring a parade and a famous Drum and Bugle Corps competition until the 1970’s.  But time has erased the great feeling of relief and joy that the nation and world felt when THE War was finally over.  Most years the anniversary goes unnoticed except by the dwindling veterans and their immediate families.

Tuesday, September 1, 2026

Crosseyed James Gordon Bennett Gave Birth to Modern Newspapers and Sensation Mongering

 

James Gordon Bennett, the cross-eyed publisher in 1851.

James Gordon Bennett, Sr., born this day in 1795 in Newmill, Banffshire, Scotland, was so cross-eyed that one acquaintance said, “when he looked at me with one eye, he looked out at the City Hall with the other.”  Yet he saw far enough to revolutionize American journalism in several ways for good and ill.

Bennet was born into a prosperous Catholic family which was devout enough to give him a good education in hopes that he would enter the priesthood.   He entered a seminary in Aberdeen at age 15 and remained there for four years.  But the restless lad was not cut out for the restraints of the cloth.  He undertook a series of rambles about Scotland while reading voraciously just about anything he could lay his hands on while living on a modest income from his undoubtedly disappointed family.

In 1819 at age 23 he and a friend sailed for North America pretty much on a lark.  After arriving in Halifax, Nova Scotia he found work as a school master, the occupation of a gentleman at loose ends.  He frugally saved enough of his meager earnings to pay for passage to Portland, Maine and the allure of a new start in the raw but promising United States.   After another few months as teacher in a rustic village, Bennett made another jump to Boston, in 1820 the proud Hub of the Universe.

Bennett became something of an itinerant chasing opportunity where he could find it in New England. He as a book seller’s clerk and a proofreader for some of the publishers who sold their wares in his shop.  Then it was on to South Carolina where the Charleston Courier hired him to translate Spanish news articles from journals arriving in the busy port from Europe, the Caribbean, and Latin America—his first newspaper work.  By 1823 he was in New York City where he first sold news stories and commentary to various papers—today we would call him a freelancer—before landing a spot as assistant editor of the New York Courier and Enquirer, one of the oldest newspapers in the city.

His bitterness over his own experiences at seminary and years spent in New England and the South where anti-Catholicism was rife turned him away from his family’s faith.

New York was the right city at the right time for an ambitious young man.  Thanks to a commodious harbor and the opening of the Erie Canal the city was eclipsing Boston as the commercial, if not yet the cultural capital of the country and was poised to surpass Philadelphia as the financial hub, especially after the Second Bank of the United States was stripped of its Charter by Andrew Jackson in 1836.

That was just a year after Bennett finally raised enough money to open his own newspaper in 1835.  The New York Herald first hit the streets in May of that year.  Intent from the beginning on the widest possible circulation, Bennet aimed his paper squarely at the city’s shopkeepers, clerks, and skilled workingmen instead of at the business and political elites.  Like his contemporary Phineas T.  Barnum he employed excitement and diversion and flattery the by confirming his readers' biases. 

On one hand that meant lurid coverage of crime, scandal, fires, and disasters and on the other hand expressing restrained support for the burgeoning anti-Catholic Know Nothings.  Bennett later explained that it was “not to instruct but to startle and amuse.”


Largely due to the lurid coverage in the
New York Herald the murder of prostitute Helen Jewett fascinated the public for decades.  This illustration from a post-Civil War book on the case depicts the alleged killer, Richard P. Robinson slinking away from the scene after bludgeoning the woman in the head with a hatchet and setting her bed on fire with an oil lamp.

The fledgling paper got just what it was looking for with the sensational story of the grisly murder of a young prostitute named Helen Jewett who was found hacked in the head by an ax in her bed in an upscale brothel.  Bennett first initiated the practice of assigning reporters to regularly check in at police stations, courts, and firehouses—beat reporting—that broke the case on the front page of the Herald and continued breathless coverage through the investigation and the trial of 19-year-old Richard P. Robinson, a young man from a respectable and prosperous family who was one of Jewett’s regular customers.

The lurid coverage broke old taboos in the press on sexual scandal which was either omitted from the news or only hinted at in language so oblique that it took a sophisticated reader to decode it.  Bennet was blunt about Jewett’s profession, place of employment, and Robinson’s patronage, although he came to depict Robinson as an innocent young man drawn to debauchery by a tainted woman.  In addition, Bennett’s article featuring the account of Rosina Townsend, Jewett’s madam who discovered body, which has been widely credited with being the first interview published in an American newspaper.  He claimed to have personally conducted the questioning.  Some historians believe it was creatively edited and some believe it was a hoax altogether.

While Bennett’s coverage defended Robinson, his competition at the New York Sun, a paper aimed at a more working class readership than the Herald played up the class resentment of the defendant as a wealthy kid who could buy his way out of killing a poor girl driven to degradation by cruel circumstances.  The two papers battled it out in what became the first great urban circulation war.

In the end, Bennett won twice.  First, sales of the upstart Herald soared, and the paper was soon the most widely read in the city.  Second, Robinson did beat the rap.  The judge disallowed critical testimony of most witnesses—other prostitutes—as inherently unreliable due to their loose morals.  It then took less than half an hour for the jury—all male and respectably middle class—to acquit the young man.

Having found a formula for success, Bennett never looked back.  From waterfront murders to scandals among the elite, to riots, fires, and shipwrecks his faithful readers could count on something exciting every day.  In 1839 he upped the ante by becoming the first newspaper to publish illustrations on its front page—hastily produced wood cuts.


Bennett was the first to employ boys to hawk his papers on the streets revolutionizing circulation in New York and spreading to other cities across the country.  James Cafferty painted this picture of a "news butcher" selling the Herald in 1851.

He also built circulation by recruiting armies of street venders—news boysto hawk the paper on street corners across the rapidly growing city.  Other papers quickly followed suite creating a fixture of city life that endured for a century.

On the business end, Bennett was equally innovative and aggressive.  Other publishers seemed to spend half their time chasing down and dunning in arrears advertisers and subscribers.  Bennet firmly demanded cash in advance from both.

By 1840 Bennett was a wealthy and successful man. He finally had time, at age 59 to take a wife, Henrietta Agnes Crean.  Together they would have three children including the apple of his eye and heir, James Gordon Bennett, Jr.


Ephemeral copies of the
Herald from its early years are nearly impossible to find.  This tattered 1842 edition is one of the few that have survived.  Any copies that the paper may have kept in its own morgue were lost in a disastrous fire during which James Gordon Bennett, Jr. drunkenly tried to assume command of responding fire companies and had to be hosed away by the firemen to keep him out of the way.

Unlike most other New York papers, the Herald was not affiliated with either the Whigs or Democrats or any faction of either.  As noted, Bennett was sympathetic to the Know Nothings and supported some of their local candidates but did not embrace the most extreme anti-immigrant rhetoric, perhaps because he was an immigrant himself.  He extended his coverage to national politics and personally conducted the first interview of a sitting president—Democrat Martin Van Buren.  The former New York State boss of the Albany Regency, one of the first political machines, Van Buren was shrewd enough to exploit the platform provided by New York City’s most influential paper.

Despite the journalistic coup the instinctively conservative Bennett made Whig William Henry Harrison his first national endorsement in 1840.  Thereafter he would swing between parties supporting James K. Polk in 1844, Zachary Taylor in1848, and Franklin Pierce in 1852, all winners.  He was particularly enthusiastic about Pierce, a Northern Democrat with Southern principles.  But Pierce descended into an alcoholic depressive stupor after he watched his beloved son being killed in a railroad accident on the way to Washington and then apparently reneged on an implied promise to appoint Bennett as American minister plenipotentiary to France.  He turned relentlessly against the hapless Pierce attacking him almost daily on the Herald front page and in scathing editorials.

In 1856 Bennett actually flirted with supporting John C. Frémont, the first Republican candidate probably because the dashing famed explorer, Mexican War hero, and self-proclaimed liberator of California made good copy.  But in the end, he passed over New York State’s former President Millard Fillmore running on the American Party (Know Nothing) ticket and backed James Buchannan, Pierce’s Secretary of State and another Northern Democrat with Southern sympathies.

In this mocking cartoon from a rival publication, Bennett is shown as a Scotsman so stereotypically thrifty that he dresses in rags as he rebuff attempts to clothe him in the leather kepi and cloak of the pro-Lincoln Wide Awakes in 1860.

Thereafter Bennett became reliably Democrat and an increasingly powerful influence on the party.  In 1860 with the sand of the Union shifting under his feet, he first endorsed Southern Democrat and incumbent Vice President John C. Breckinridge, then shifted to Senator John Bell of Tennessee, a Democrat running as a Constitutional Unionist.  He thus bypassed Northern Democrat Stephen A. Douglas and Republican Abraham Lincoln.

In 1861 the Herald reported a circulation 84,000 copies and called itself “the most largely circulated journal in the world.”  That also made it perhaps the most influential U.S. newspaper despite competition from Horace Greelys Republican leaning New York Tribune.


Despite Bennett's stinging criticism of his administration, Abraham Lincoln was a devoted daily reader of the Herald for its accurate and detailed reports of battles in all theaters of the war.

When war broke out, Bennett positioned himself as a loyal war Democrat and a harsh critic of Lincoln’s conduct of the war and later the Emancipation Proclamation, 14th Amendment, and his refusal to entertain Confederate peace feelers.   Despite regular and often scurrilous attacks in its pages, Lincoln was one of the paper’s most avid readers.  He had fresh copies rushed to the White House as soon as they arrived by train from New York.  He admired the paper’s coverage of the war.  Bennett dispatched dozens of correspondents to accompany Union troops in all theaters of the war resulting in detailed accounts of major battles.  Lincoln often found them more reliable than the reports of his generals who tended to minimize their mistakes and exaggerate their accomplishments.

As the wartime election of 1864 drew closer Bennett was a major force in promoting former Union General in Chief George C. McClellan for the Democratic nomination.  McClellan, who Lincoln had dismissed for his timid reluctance to fully commit his Army of the Potomac against Robert E. Lees Army of Northern Virginia, ran on a platform of offering generous terms to the Rebel states.  But as the election neared Lincoln, who was widely expected to face defeat, gained strength as the tide of war finally seemed to shift against the South.  Perhaps because his son was in the Navy commanding his own armed yacht in action off of Florida, Bennett ultimately decided to make no endorsement in the Herald in that election, although a discerning reader could not fail to notice a bias for McClellan.

After Lincoln was assassinated in April of 1865 and the war drew to a close, Bennett and the Herald pivoted shamelessly and became leaders in turning President into a martyr.  It was not just chasing popular opinion, although that was part of it.  Bennett became an ardent supporter of Lincoln’s second Vice President, Andrew Johnson, a War Democrat, former border state, loyal U.S. Senator, Union General, and wartime Governor of Tennessee.  He supported Johnson’s policy of a generous and gentle reconstruction of the Southern states as a realization of Lincoln’s own postwar plans and as an alternative to the punitive policies of the Radical Republicans in Congress.  The paper stood by Johnson through his impeachment ordeal.


James Gordon Bennet, Jr. who took over his father's newspaper when he was 25 years old was to say the least a colorful character.

In 1866 Bennett retired at age 75 and turned the reins of the Herald over to his 25-year-old son, James Gordon Bennett, Jr.  The younger man was raised mostly in France in the lap of luxury.  He was noted as a yachtsman, a dashing spendthrift, womanizer, and debauched alcoholic.  But he continued to build circulation with a steady diet of sensationalism, not flinching at publishing accounts of his own scandals like drunkenly driving his carriage at high speed through the streets of Manhattan naked on several occasions, brawls over women, and being horse whipped by the brothers of his lovely fiancé, socialite Caroline May when he drunkenly intruded into a May family dinner and proceeded to urinate on the furniture and into the fireplace.

The younger Bennett had a knack for circulation building gimmicks, most famously dispatching reporter Henry Morton Stanley to Africa to find the un-lost missionary Dr. David Livingstone in 1869.  If the news was unsatisfactorily dull, he was not averse to making it up like a famous 1871 hoax about wild animals escaping from the Brooklyn Zoo and terrorizing that city.  Later, in 1881 he backed George W. De Long’s voyage to the North Pole on the USS Jeannette via the Bering Strait. The ill-fated expedition led to the deaths from starvation of DeLong and 19 of his crew, a tragedy that only increased the paper’s circulation.


Bennett Jr sent reporter Henry Morton Stanley to Africa to search for the supposedly lost English missionary and physician Dr. David Livingston.  Dispatches from Stanley were breathlessly awaited by readers.  This is an illustration from the best selling book that Stanley wrote based on his newspaper filings.

The senior Bennett died in Manhattan on June 1, 1872 at age 76 just five months before his rival Horace Greeley also succumbed to illness in November.  He left his son a huge fortune.

After the scandal over his boorish behavior at his fiancé’s house, Bennett Jr., who preferred to be called simply Gordon, relocated to Paris where he lived most of the rest of his life when he was not aboard one of his increasingly fantastic yachts or other mansions in London, Newport Rhode Island, and elsewhere.  He attempted to micromanage the Herald by telegraph but found himself increasingly out of touch with New York. 

Meanwhile new competitors were arising to compete in sensationalism including Joseph Pulitzers New York World, and then William Randolph Hearsts New York Journal.  After peaking in circulation in the mid 1880’s the paper began a long, slow decline. 

Meanwhile, in Paris Bennett launched English language Paris Herald and then a London edition.  Both papers fielded numerous correspondents throughout Europe and much of the rest of the world and fed international news to the parent paper in New York.  In time the Paris Herald became a respected paper and even a rival of the Times of London as an international voice.

Bennet Jr. died on May 14, 1918, in Beaulieu-sur-Mer, Alpes-Maritimes, France. 

In 1924 the New York Herald was acquired by its smaller rival the New York Tribune, to form the New York Herald Tribune.  The Paris edition became the International Herald Tribune.  In its new guise the New York paper shed its sensationalist image and positioned itself to compete with the New York Time as a sober and respectable mainstream newspaper. 

Despite its reputation and innovative journalism, the New York paper lagged behind the Times and was mortally wounded by a disastrous 114-day newspaper strike and ushered in four years of strife with labor unions, particularly the International Typographical Union. Faced with mounting losses then owner John Hay Whitney shut the paper down on August 15, 1966.

The New York Times and Washington Post jointly acquired the Paris edition which is now published as the New York Times International Edition.


The Bell Ringers
, an elaborate animated bronze clock that once adorned the 1894 Herald Building now sits in Herald Square as a monument to James Gordon Bennett Sr. and Jr.  It also plays a snatch of George M. Cohan's Give My Regards to Broadway, the line that goes, "remember me to Herald Square."

James Gordon Bennett and his son are both commemorated in a monument on Herald Square in New York—an animated bronze clock featuring the Roman goddess of wisdom Minerva and two muscular hammer wielding bell ringers by sculptor Jean Antonin Carles.  It first adorned the Herald Building that once stood directly to the north of the square on West 35th Street in 1894.