In December 1906 a Black owned Richmond, Virginia paper came to the defense of soldiers of the 25th United States Infantry Regiment accused of a deadly shooting in Brownsville, Texas. |
On the dark,
hot, and dusty late night of August 13, 1906 shots were fired on a Brownsville, Texas street leaving a
bartender in the rowdy district dead and a police officer wounded. Both of the victims were White. Mayor Frederick Combe
was quick to charge that the crime was committed by members of the 25th United States Infantry Regiment, a
Black unit stationed at adjacent Fort Brown.
The troops had
arrived at the post on July 28, some from recent service in the Philippines and others reassigned from Fort Niobrara, Nebraska. Local residents had long been opposed to the Army posting Black troops to the Fort. The peace time army, however was short handed
and had traditionally post black troops, sometime still called Buffalo Soldiers to “hardship” posts in
the west.
The soldiers
found themselves harassed and even assaulted on the streets of the town. Tensions
were running exceptionally high after a street fight between a soldier and a
local citizen a few days earlier. When a
White woman claimed to be molested on August 12, the Mayor requested that the
Army confine the men to the post.
Commanding officer Maj. Charles
W. Penrose agreed and put the troops on early curfew. When townspeople leveled charges against
unnamed soldiers, after the August 13 shooting, Penrose and other White
officers were able to produce bed check records showing all men were at the
Fort at the time of the shooting.
Despite this a citizen’s committee investigating the
shooting found witnesses who claimed that they had seen soldiers running
through the streets at some distance.
Spent .30 cartridges, supposedly from the troopers rifles were produced
as evidence, although subsequent investigation showed that they were planted.
At the
insistence of the Mayor, the Army withdrew the unit from Fr. Brown but did not
provide White replacements.
Texas Ranger Captain William Jesse McDonald was called in to
investigate. He accepted all local white
claims at face value and discounted Army evidence to the contrary, including
sentry reports of hearing pistol fire from
“beyond the reservation” at the time of the shooting. He interviewed 125 men from the post and all
steadfastly denied any knowledge of the shooting.
Maj. Augustus P. Blockson of the Army's
Southwestern Division, deemed the
soldiers uncooperative and urged their dismissal if they refused to “provide
evidence.” McDonald eventually brought
12 soldiers to the Cameron County Grand
Jury as leaders of a “conspiracy.”
The Grand Jury, however, refused to issue indictments. Despite this, Army Inspector General Ernest A. Garlington charged a “conspiracy of
silence” against all of the Black enlisted men stationed at the Fort and recommended
summery dismissal from the service.
November 5 President Theodore Roosevelt discharged
“without honor” all 167 enlisted men previously garrisoning Fort Brown. The men included distinguished soldiers with
as many a 40 years of service including veterans of the Indian Wars, Spanish
American War, and Philippine
Insurrection. The dismissal resulted
in loss of pension and a permanent ban on future service in the armed forces or
any Federal employment.
The nation’s
most highly regarded Black leader, educator Booker T. Washington, personally appealed to the President, with
whom he had previously had warm relations, but was not only rebuffed, but
publicly humiliated. Despite this
Washington refused to criticize Roosevelt, permanently damaging his reputation
with other Black leaders.
The case
remained controversial and Senator
Joseph B. Foraker (R-Ohio), a
political rival of the President, continued to defend the troops and charged
the President with caving to political pressure. He held hearings in which the majority sided
with the President, but Foraker and one other Senator issued a minority report
alleging that the shooting had been staged by locals to force the removal of
the troops.
When Foraker
failed to be re-nominated for the Senate in 1808, Congressional pressure on the
case evaporated. Enough publicity had,
however, been generated for William
Howard Taft to appoint a board of retired Army officers to hear requests
for re-instatement to the service on an individual basis. After interviewing somewhat over half the
applicants, the Court of Military
Inquiry in 1910 approved only fourteen of the men for re-instatement before
disbanding.
That ended
action until 1970 when John D. Weaver published The Brownsville Raid which
investigated the affair in depth and presented evidence that all the accused
members of the 25th Regiment were in fact innocent. As a result the Army
conducted a new investigation on the affair and in 1972 found the men innocent.
The Nixon Administration overturned
all of the accused soldier's dishonorable discharges, but refused to grant
their families the back pay in pensions.
Dorsie Willis, the
last surviving veteran did receive a meager $25,000 pension.
To this day the City of Brownsville has refused to
apologize to the families of the victim soldiers or acknowledge any wrong doing
in the affair. In fact some local
historians continue to maintain that Black troopers were involved in the
original shooting.
No comments:
Post a Comment