Men arrested at Mrs. Clap's Molly House and others hung in a public execution at Tyburn in 1726. |
On
May 9, 1726 five unfortunate patsies were
strung up and publicly hanged on the notorious
gallows at Tyburn, the rural execution spot not far outside
the walls of London. Or it may have been just three. Accounts differ. Confusion may have arisen because the busy gibbet often accommodated several
hangings at once and there may have been other common criminals dangled with them.
A woodblock print purporting show
the execution shows seven victims.
At
the time hanging was a popular public
amusement regularly drawing large
crowds of witnesses. The list of capital crimes was long and included
not just murder and highway robbery but such petty crimes as pickpocketing or pilfering
an apple from a green grocer. Twelve
year olds were routinely snuffed out
for lifting a gentleman’s
handkerchief.
The
crime of these particular chaps was sodomy,
a capital felony under the Buggery
Act 1533. They were among 40 men
plus the proprietor swept up in a
raid on Mother Clap’s Molly house on
a February Sunday evening. Margaret Clap operated a coffee house out of her home in Field Lane, Holborn, near the Bunch o’ Grapes
tavern
The
modest establishment, which Mrs. Clap had opened two years earlier, was
supposedly also a Molly house—an
establishment that catered to homosexual
men. Several had been operating in
and near London since about 1700 discretely
but openly despite the sodomy laws.
Unlike
most such places Mrs. Claps was neither a tavern nor did it serve as a bordello providing prostitutes for its customers.
She made her large parlor and
several rooms available for the entertainment and amusement of her clients and beds were
available in every room. There was much gayety, dancing, singing, and petting
in the common room with men
frequently pairing up to be “married” in the smaller rooms,
sometimes with doors left open so
others could watch the proceedings. Since she had no license as a pub, Mrs. Clap would frequently have to
leave her home to visit the Bunch o’ Grapes
to obtain libations for her
guests.
Mrs.
Clap seems to have been genuinely fond of
her clientele and tended to their needs and desires with great solicitousness, going above and beyond the attention of a mere
business woman. She often extended small loans to some customers
and once let one regular who had
been thrown out of his home by an irate wife and was homeless lodge in one of
her rooms for a year and a half. Even
while she was being held herself in Newgate
prison she evidently arranged an alibi
that got one of the men arrested in the raid off the hook. For their part
many of the men returned the affection and tried as much as possible to defend her in their testimony to the court. They called her in fondness Mother Clap. She may have been what was in the parlance of 1970’s queer slang, a fag hag.
As
for her clientele, she served and welcomed
all classes but most of the men were local artisans, tradesmen, farmers,
and laborer as well urchin street prostitutes who they
sometimes brought with them. There may
have been occasional slumming gentlemen
if any were caught up in the raid, their connections
and wealth soon procured a swift, discreet release without
charges.
Despite
this, popular illustrations
published after the Molly house raids usually depicted clients as gentlemen—often
as Army officers, judges, and high churchmen. Whatever might have been the case in some Molly houses
in or on the fringes of fashionable districts instead of on
the virtual outskirts of London,
Mrs. Clap does not seem to have entertained these sorts. The pictures, however, played into the common perception of many ordinary Britons that the elite ruling classes were riddled with homosexuality. Which, of
course, was quite true.
Convivial gatherings apparently
occurred on any evening, but evidently Sunday nights were especially popular
and may have amounted to weekly parties. Authorities were aware of that. They had the
establishment under surveillance for
more than a year and used a client coerced to turn informer to introduce a police agent into the
scene.
Actually,
police agent is a misnomer. There was no
police department that we would recognize and would not be for more than a
century the Bow Street Runners, bailiffs
of the court who exercised arrest warrants were
consolidated with local constables by
Sir Robert Peel in 1829 as the Metropolitan Police—the Bobbies of Scotland Yard.
Instead
the investigation and raid was conducted by the Society for the Reformation
of Manners, a private organization
of zealous reformers out to erase the libertinism that had established
itself in London during the Restoration period. The organization enjoyed support
at the highest levels of society and government up to and
including the new Hanoverian Dynasty represented by King George I.
Acting in a quasi-official manner,
the Society employed its own “constables” and an army of spies and informants
who conducted investigations, raids, and pressed prosecutions in its own
name.
The Society recruited an informant named Mark Partridge who was enraged at having
been revealed as a homosexual in
previous investigations and blamed his former companions and lovers. Partridge identified several Molly houses,
including the one maintained by Mrs. Clap, to the society and then introduced
one of their constable/agents into the houses as his “husband.” Notes and testimony by the agent, Samuel Stevens became key in the future
prosecutions and provided sensational
accounts in newspapers, broadsides,
and penny pamphlets. For
instance he wrote in his report to the Society:
I found between
40 and 50 Men making Love to one another, as they call’d it. Sometimes they
would sit on one another’s Laps, kissing in a lewd Manner, and using their
Hands indecently. Then they would get up, Dance and make Curtsies, and mimick
the voices of Women. O, Fie, Sir! – Pray, Sir. – Dear Sir. Lord, how can you
serve me so? – I swear I’ll cry out. – You’re a wicked Devil. – And you’re a
bold Face. – Eh ye little dear Toad! Come, buss! – Then they’d hug, and
play, and toy, and go out by Couples into another Room on the same Floor, to be
marry’d, as they call’d it.
Armed
with such intelligence, the raid in
February snared 40 men, but none were caught in flagrante delicto
which complicated the prosecution on
the capital crime of sodomy. At most
some were found with breaches unbuttoned
or wearing snatches of women’s clothing.
To obtain convictions, the society had to rely on
the testimony of two turn-coat
informants, both petty criminals
and likely prostitutes, Thomas Newton and Edward Courtney who had already been used as “queer-bait and agents
provocateurs or entrappers.” One
or both of them testified to participating
in sexual acts with all of those
sentenced to hang and others who were sentenced to prison and the pillory.
As
the trial progressed there became some publish
backlash for using the testimony of
such disreputable characters as the sole evidence of actual sodomy. That especially was the case for 43 year old Gabriel Lawrence, a milk peddler and widower with a teenage
daughter who was able to produce many witnesses to his good character and that no one other than Newton and Courtney had
ever been the recipient of any advances.
Lawrence admitted to drinking at Mrs. Claps regularly with a friend, Henry Yoxam the cow keeper who supplied him and several Molly houses with milk, but
adamantly proclaimed his innocence of any indecencies. None the less,
he was sentenced to hang.-
With
outrage for the witch hunt growing,
prosecutors quietly declined to press charges against those who had not already
either bought their way out of trouble or been freed for lack of evidence.
That
did not include Mrs. Clap herself. When
she was finally brought before the bar
she pled innocent to the charge of keeping a disorderly house. She told the jury “I hope it will be consider’d that
I am a Woman, and therefore it cannot be thought that I would ever be concern’d
in such Practices.” She was convicted
anyway and harshly sentenced for the offense—“to stand in the pillory in Smithfield,
to pay a fine of 20 marks, and to
suffer two years’ imprisonment.”
She
never survived to serve her prison sentence.
She was so grievously mistreated
by a mob at the pillory—probably pelted
with stones and beaten with sticks—that she collapsed three times and had to be carried away insensible. She
probably died of her injuries within
hours or days, although no record of her
passing was recorded. She simply vanished to official history.
This
grisly and unfortunate tale is a useful
counter to a somewhat fashionable
claim made by some current historians
that prior to the 20th Century there
was no Gay culture and homosexuality as we understand it did not exist.
They don’t deny that there were individuals who engaged in
homosexual acts or relationships, but maintain that society viewed them differently
and that so did the individuals whether the acts were suppressed or winked at. But modern observers will quickly note the characteristics
of a well established gay culture in this story—a common code slang, conventions,
safe-space gathering spots, role playing,
and cross dressing. Similar establishments and cultures
established themselves in large urban
centers where there was some sense
of anonymity and a certain critical
mass of population. Like the bathhouses of the ‘60’ and’70’s and the bars, clubs, and discos of
today, the Molly houses thrived in a
culture with a modicum of tolerance and
then became rallying points of
resistance in times of repression.
Poster for the London production of Mother Clap's Molly House by Mark Ravenhill. |
The
story of Mrs. Clap’s Molly house has become foundational to modern
British gay culture. It has been
told and retold in novels, poems, histories and recently in an avant-garde
stage musical, Mother Clap’s Molly House by Mark Ravenhill.
No comments:
Post a Comment