Showing posts with label Magi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Magi. Show all posts

Friday, March 27, 2026

Avatar of Proto-Monotheism—The Clouded Origin and Birth Date of Zoroaster

 

                    A contemporary Zoroastrian print depicting the sect's founder, prophet, and avatar.

Yesterday, March 26, was Khordad Sal celebrated as the birthday of Zoroaster also known as the Greater Noruz and which is marked six days after Noruz, the vernal equinox.  

All founders of great religions need a feast day to be celebrated by their followers.  Most often the feast is identified with the birthday, death date, transformation to godhood, or ascension to immortality.  In the case of Zoroaster, the founder of an ancient proto-monotheistic religion which blossomed in Persia (Iran) and became the state religion of vast empires, the feast is a traditional birthday.  But not only is his real birthday not known, scholars have trouble identifying the era in which he lived by margins of hundreds of years.  At least modern ones do better than the Greek historian of philosophy Diogenes and the Roman Plutarch who misdated him by several millennia at around 6,000 BCE. 

The Fravashi are spirit angels whose traditional depictions are often considered a major symbol of Zoroasterism.  History Channel pseudo science bunk peddlers would have you that they are representations of aliens in their space craft.

The problem with dating Zoroaster is largely a problem of jibing linguistic development with known historical events.  All stories agree that Zoroaster was a priest of an already ancient and long established polytheistic religion who developed new ideas elevating the deity Ahura Mazda of wisdom, truth, and pure goodness to the status of Supreme Being and Creator, while demoting various other deities to Fravashi, roughly analogous to angels or spirit saints and demons under a Satan-like Angra Mainy who introduced the destructive mentality of the lie into the world.   Works of Holy Scriptures are attributed to him—GathasYasnaVendidadVisperadYashts—which are included in an overarching Scripture that includes ritual practices, prayers, and fragments of other texts not attributed to him. 

The problem is that the oldest of his texts are in an early form of an Aryan tongue known as Avestan of which the texts are the only surviving documentation.  That would seem to date these writings, 17 poems of the Gathas, to sometime before 2,000 BCE.  But later writings, including supposed autobiographical accounts of his life were written in Persian dialects from around 600 BCE.    The great age of the Gathas is what convinced the Greeks and Romans that Zororaster’s origins were very early.

Scholars now date the historic Zoroaster to somewhere in a 200-to-300-year range centering on 600 BCE.  That would indicate that he adapted as his own far more ancient teachings and popularized them.

Then there is the problem of just where the hell Zoroaster was from.  A lot of claimants for this honor.  The earliest texts identify him as coming from Airyanem Vaejah meaning roughly the Expanse of the Aryans a/k/a the Iranians.  It may reference a fast-flowing river and valley, perhaps in the southern central Asian Plateau or in the north of modern Afghanistan.  These same texts fail to mention any of the well-known tribes of western Iran—the MedesPersians, and Parthians.

Like Buddhism and Christianity a miracle birth story developed around Zoroaster/Zarathustra as illustrated in this children's book.  

Later texts, however, place him in western Iran and identify his priestly cast as the Magi of the Medes and Persians.  Modern scholars tend to dismiss the possibility of him being from western Iran and argue between themselves over points of origin from central and eastern Iran, Afghanistan, Baluchistan in western modern Pakistan, Bactria on the plateau north of the Hindu-Kush Mountains, Turkmenistan, and the vast steppes west of the Volga.  Put your money down and take your pick.

Although Zoroaster’s original autobiographical writings were thought destroyed in when Alexander the Greats Army captured Persepolis, capital of the Achaemenid Empire centered in Persia and burned the royal library there.  Or not.  Some scholars dismiss this and say that the original texts, if they existed were lost long before.  At any rate later summaries of the lost texts provide a fairly detailed biography.

Zoroaster was born into a Bronze Age Aryan culture in a priestly line, the Spitamids.  His father and mother were identified by name—Poroschasp and Dughdova.  He followed the family trade but was increasingly dissatisfied with ritual practices that included animal sacrifice and the corrupt use of religion by a governing caste of princelings and soldiers to oppress the mass of common people.  He took a wife, Huvovi and together they had three sons and three daughters.

At age 30 Zoroaster was illuminated by Ahura Mazda and began preaching his revised worship of the elevated deity and his philosophy of a struggle between the forces of pure truth and goodness and those of lies and evil.  He eliminated animal sacrifice, simplified ritual, and argued against excessive religious taxes diverted to the caste of worldly rulers.  He developed a system which, for its time and place, was relatively light on miracles and magic and developed an advanced ethical philosophy.

Huvovi and his children were his first converts and his sons became his priests.  At least one daughter was said to have made a strategic marriage to a local ruler that helped spread adoption of the new religion.  Zoroaster faced many obstacles in his preaching, including the fierce opposition of traditional priests and of the nobility who felt undermined.  He was shunned and outcast in his own mother’s hometown.  Yet eventually truth and goodness—aša—triumphed over druj—the lie and much of Zoroaster’s homeland, wherever it was, was brought to the faith.

Zoroaster preaches to legendary Vishtaspa--Hystaspes to the Greeks--a king and/or Mag sage who became one of his earliest supporters and a major figure in scripture.

No mention was made of how the Master died, but later traditions have him murdered at his altar in Balkh located in Afghanistan during a Holy War between Turans—an Iranian tribe—and the Persian Empire in 583 BCE.  This tale undoubtedly owes more to politico/religious struggles for legitimacy within the Persian Empire and its successors than any historical truth.

We do know that by reign of Cyrus the Great, about 560-530 BCE, Zoroastrianism was wide-spread in his newly unified Persian Achaemenid Empire, although not yet a state religion. Through their enemies the Persians, the Greeks learned about Zoroaster and his teachings, which later became influential in their emerging philosophy though the work of Plato and others.  Likewise, the empire brought it to the Jews who were also influenced, especially by Zoroastrian duality which shows up in the concepts of the struggle between light and darkness of the Essenes as evidenced in the Dead Sea Scrolls.  Through both the Greeks and the Jews it influenced Christianity and later Islam, which conquered the Zoroastrian heartland.

Zoroaster influenced Greek philosophers as well religions like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam,  In his famous painting The School of Athens Renaissance master Raphael depicted Zoroaster--the bearded figure holding the crystal globe--among the sages in the agora.

The name Zoroaster is, in fact, the Greek form of the name which has become generally used in the West.  In Persian the name is Zarathustra, which Friedrich Nietzsche adopted for his philosophical novel, Also sprach ZarathustraThus Spoke Zarathustra—in which he put his own thoughts on the death of God and the Übermensch into the old prophet’s mouth.

  Darius the Great of the Persian Achaemenid Empire was a personal devotee of Zoroaster and after his death Zoroasterism became the State religion of the empire.

When Darius I came to the Achaemenid throne in 522 BCE he was known to be a personal devotee of Ahura Mazda, but at the time that did not necessarily mean he was a Zoroastrian.  He could still have recognized the ancient pantheon but simply dedicated himself to that divinity.  On the other hand, he may have been.  Not long after Darius died, after extending the empire from Egypt and the Levant to Trace and Macedonia in the Balkans—after failing to conquer SpartaAthens, and the Greeks—east into India, Zoroastrianism became the state religion, although other cults were generally permitted. 

The Achaemenids felto Alexander, but when his heirs could not maintain his eastern empire, the Parthians arose and established an Empire from eastern Asia Minor down through both sides of the Persian Gulf and east through Afghanistan.  This empire lasted from 247 BCE to 224 AD when it disintegrated after a long series of wars with the Roman Empire and the rise of the Sasanians.  This empire would also make Zoroastrianism a state religion alongside the ancient gods of the Babylonians.

The Zoroastrians had a last, long run as an imperial religion with the Sasanian Empire, which was the chief rival of the Byzantines to the east, between 224 and 651 when it finally fell to the Islamic invasion.

The Islamic Caliphate not only absorbed the entire Sasanian Empire, it quickly expanded to cover roughly the same territory as the old Achaemenid Empire and then some. 

Despite the conquest, under the Umayyad Caliphate there was little pressure put upon the local populations to abandon their traditional religions so long as they were monotheistic, their activities did not disrupt or insult Islam, and adherents paid a tax—jizya which was leveled on non-Muslims living in the realm.  Over time, however, the tax grew repressive and barriers to advancement in the Caliphate encouraged many, especially among the elite and in the major cities, to convert.  After the beginning of the Crusades there was a general backlash against all religious minorities and more oppressive steps were taken, including local rioting and massacres were allowed to transpire by authorities.

During the Caliphate the Zoroastrians adopted a stance of non-prostilazation to convince their overloads that unlike Christians they would not try to covert Muslims.  Only those born into the religion were accepted as members.  In the long run, as pressure continued on their populations, this custom, along with a traditionally low birth rate, and continued abandonment of the faith for Islam, contributed to a steady decline in numbers over the ages until only a tiny minority remained in the old Iranian and Afghan strongholds.

After a period of particularly brutal repression many adherents fled to India where they established communities on the southern west coast beginning in the 9th Century.  That community today represents the largest concentration of Zoroastrians in the world.  Known locally as the Parsis, less than 70,000 were counted in the 2001 Indian census, mostly concentrated around Mumbai.  

Modern Zoroastrian priests perform the Afrinagar ceremony.  They wear masks so that their sputum will not accidentally corrupt the pure flame of sacred fire in it's chalice-like cauldron. 

Their long isolation from their ancestral roots has resulted in customs that are sometimes at variance with traditional Zoroastrianism and mirror the Hindu communities in which they dwell.  This includes a modification of the ban on accepting those not born into the religion by accepting the children of marriages to non-Zoroastrians.  That has not, however, prevented a general population decline, hastened by emigration to the United States and Canada where there are now small communities.

Pressure in the traditional heartland has only gotten worse. The Shi’a in Iran and the Taliban Sunni in Afghanistan, as well as Islamists in the southern Caucuses have been equally zealous in their persecutions making many refugees who have to disguise their identities.  Hard numbers in these circumstances are hard to come by.  Less than 200,000 are thought to be scattered over a broad region overlapping several borders.

Today, probably fewer than one million Zoroastrians are left world-wide to celebrate their Master’s birthday.

Monday, January 5, 2026

I Saw Three Ships in the Morning—Murfin Winter Holidays Music Festival 2025-26


                                                                        The Chieftains with Marianne Faithful perform I Saw Three Ships in the Morning. 

The very old English carol I Saw Three Ships in the Morning the eve of the Feast of the Epiphany or Feast of the Three Kings.  There is some veiled mystery to the reference to ships for a nativity story set far from any sea or port.  Most likely the ships are the ships of the desert—camels—ridden by the wandering wise men or kings.  Other explanations include the three ships that bore the purported relics of the Magi to Cologne Cathedral in the 12th Century or a reference to Wenceslaus IIDuke of Bohemia—yes, the Good King Wenceslaus of another carol, whose coat of arms featured “Azure three galleys argent.”

The reference to “Christmas day in the morning” is for the beginning of the seers's journey supposedly on Christmas night when the Star began leading them.  On Twelfth Night they finally approach Bethlehem.


The Magi follow the Star to Bethlehem on their ships of the desert.

An alternative 19th Century versionI Saw Three Ships on New Year’s Day, told of a trio of beautiful singers each on her own ship sailing to a wedding as either entertainment or brides.


A 19th Century children's book illustration of I Saw Three Ships on New Year's Day.

The earliest printed version of I Saw Three Ships is from the 17th Century around Derbyshire and was also published by William Sandys in 1833. The song was also called As I Sat On a Sunny Bank and was particularly popular in Cornwall.  Many different melodies were used and English folklorists Cecil Sharp and Janet Blunt noted the tunes and lyrics of dozens of versions, primarily from the south of England in the first decade of the 20th Century.

Various arrangements have been recorded by Jean Richie, Nat King ColeGlen CampbellCeltic WomenSting, and even alt-rockers Bare Naked Ladies.


The Chieftains in the 1980s.

But today we enjoy a version by the revered Irish ensemble The Chieftains with a vocal by Brit '60s and '70s icon Marianne Faithfull on their 1991 album The Bells of Dublin.

Monday, January 6, 2025

We Three Kings The Feast of the Epiphany—Murfin Winter Holidays Music Festival 2024-‘25

                                                     We Three Kings by The Roaches lived on David Letterman.

The Christmas season officially ended yesterday as the Catholic Church and Western Christian denominations that borrow its liturgical calendar observe the Feast of the Epiphany today.  Theologically it is a celebration of the revelation to the world of Jesus as the fully human God the Son.  As such it celebrates a facet of the Trinity.  Little wonder that my Unitarian Universalists, who deny the whole Three-in-one God deal, don’t make much of the day.

There are several components of the revelation.  The first is the visit by the Magi to the Child in Bethlehem—the announcement of the Holy presence to the Gentile world.  Second is the baptism of Jesus in the River Jordan by his cousin John, the half-mad preacher.  Third is the marriage party in Cana where Jesus was said to have performed his first miracles—proof of his divine power.


El Día de Los Reyes Magosthe Day of the Three Wise Kings is celebrated across Latin America with unique customs including a feast featuring a cake with a hidden king or baby Jesus and the person who finds the object hosts the feast the next year.  It is also the primary gift event of the season for children.

Despite the complexity of the multiple stories, in the West the Feast of the Epiphany is largely all about those Magi.  In fact, in most Latin American countries it is most commonly known as the Feast of the Three Kings, which sort of diverts attention from the alleged star.  On the Eve the Magi are finally added to Nativity scenes and on January 6, children wake up to gifts from the Kings.  It was the main gift giving occasion of the Christmas season, or at least was until ubiquitous Santa Claus began invading traditional cultures.


The story of the Magi from the 
Bible morphed into three specific Eastern rulers in Western tradition.

Now about those alleged Kings…First, it they existed at all they were surely not rulers of any sort.  What we know of them comes from the Gospel of Mathew as described in the King James Version of the Bible'

2 Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem,

2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.

3 When Herod the king had heard these things, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him.

4 And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he demanded of them where Christ should be born.

5 And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judaea: for thus it is written by the prophet,

6 And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda, art not the least among the princes of Juda: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule my people Israel.

7 Then Herod, when he had privily called the wise men, enquired of them diligently what time the star appeared.

8 And he sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search diligently for the young child; and when ye have found him, bring me word again, that I may come and worship him also.

9 When they had heard the king, they departed; and, lo, the star, which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was.

10 When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceeding great joy.

11 And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense and myrrh.

12 And being warned of God in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed into their own country another way.

Note that they are not identified in any way as kings.  They are said to be from the East, so it is likely that they were meant to represent Persian priests or Asian astrologers.  Nor is any number set.  The early Church sometimes used figures up to twelve.  Eventually the number was settled at three and totally un-Biblical tales sprang up around them.  They even grew names and origin storiesMelchior, a Persian; Caspar, an Indian; and Balthazar from Arabia—perhaps from Yemen which then had Jewish kings.  

            
                                        The Adoration of the Magi 
by Carlo Dolci.

There is no reason to believe that their visit fit neatly into the later liturgical calendar twelve days after a mid-winter birth.  In fact, the kind of Biblical scholars who try to find historical accuracy in the Bible think that the visit may have been up to two years after the birth and that the Holy family may have been in residence in Bethlehem for that long.  They infer this from the fact that Herod ordered the massacre of all male children under two years of age, not just infants.

Then there is the issue of the Star.  Of course, if you are a literalist, you believe that an actual star either hovered over the City of David, or actually moved, leading the Magi on their journey.  But those seeking natural explanations for the phenomena have proposed various possibilities, most commonly a comet or the appearance of a near-solar system super nova.  The problem with either of these suggestions is that the very careful records kept by Chinese astrologers make no note of either phenomenon in a five year window around the time of Jesus’s presumed birth.  And they surely would have noted it.

One explanation that has gained some traction is that the Star was actually a triple conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in the constellation Pisces, which is known to have occurred in 7 BCE, a little late for the story but close enough for some.  But contemporary Babylonian records show little interest in the event and do not suggest that the planets converged closely enough in the sky to create a super bright object.

Then perhaps it was a UFO.  That will probably be a History Channel two hour special next year.

Or the Star and the Magi are all pious fiction and poetry meant to inform the understanding of the birth of the Messiah to the Gentile world.  No mention of the Magi can be found in the simple nativity story found in Luke.  Presumably the sudden presence of well-dressed strangers in the stable would have been noted by those shepherds.  And why did they have to follow a Star when God apparently had no shortage of herald angels to tell the travelers just where to go?

But I don’t want to nit-pick a treasured story.  After all, much fiction can be truth in a broader sense, or at least symbolic of a truth. 

Back to the Feast of the Epiphany.  The Copts and Eastern Orthodox also celebrate the feast but on different dates dependent on their calendars.  They also celebrate the incarnation of God in Man but build their observances not so much on the Kings.  They concentrate on the Baptism as the great announcement.  


                                An icon of the Baptism of Jesus by his cousin John shows the focus of the Orthodox Feast of the Epiphany.

It was also much more celebrated in the Medieval Western church as evidenced by many pre-Renaissance paintings of the Baptism and concerning Jesus’s relations with his cousin John. 

But those virtually disappeared signaling a change of Christology in the Catholic Church.  Emphasis on John and other earthy relatives of Jesus such as his siblings like James of Jerusalem seemed uncomfortably close to viewing Jesus as a wholly mortal man, not a partner in a godhead.

Anyway, there you have it—The Feast of the Epiphany.  Celebrate or not as you choose.  


                                                        We Three Kings 
author and composer the Rev. John Henry Hopkins, Jr.

The song most associated with the Epiphany is, of course, We Three Kings of Orient Are.  It   was written in 1857 by John Henry Hopkins Jr., Rector of Christ Episcopal Church in Williamsport, Pennsylvania. He wrote the carol for a Christmas pageant in New York City at his alma mater, the General Theological Seminary.  He published the carol in 1863 in his book Carols, Hymns, and Songs. It was the first American Christmas carol to achieve international popularity, as well as the first to be featured in Christmas Carols Old and New, the prestigious and influential collection published in Britain in 1916 and was printed in the hymnal of the Episcopal Church.  


The Roaches went from small clubs and college dates to stars of Americana, the then new niche musical category for folk infused singer-songwriters and acts exploring "roots music on the strength of their Christmas album  We Three Kings.

It has been recorded countless times.  In 1990 the American indie-folk act The Roches went from a semi-obscure trio with a cult following to broader stardom in the acoustic and Americana niches with their Christmas album We Three Kings.  Sisters Maggie, Terre, and Suzzy Roche performed the title song on one of David Lettermans holiday shows.



Sunday, January 5, 2025

I Saw Three Ships in the Morning—Murfin Winter Holidays Music Festival 2024-‘25


                                                                            The Chieftains with Marianne Faithful perform I Saw Three Ships in the Morning.

The very old English carol I Saw Three Ships in the Morning is apt for the last Sunday of the Christmas Season and eve of the Feast of the Epiphany or Feast of the Three Kings.  There is some veiled mystery to the reference to ships for a nativity story set far from any sea or port.  Most likely the ships are the ships of the desertcamels—ridden by the wandering wise men or kings.  Other explanations include the three ships that bore the purported relics of the Magi to Cologne Cathedral in the 12th Century or a reference  to Wenceslaus II, Duke of Bohemia—yes the Good King Wenceslaus of another carol, whose coat of arms  featured “Azure three galleys argent.”

The reference to “Christmas day in the morning” is for the beginning of the seers's journey supposedly on Christmas night when the Star began leading them.  On Twelfth Night they finally approach Bethlehem.


The Magi follow the Star to Bethlehem on their ships of the desert.


An alternative 19th Century version, I Saw Three Ships on New Year’s Day, told of a trio of beautiful singers each on her own ship sailing to a wedding as either entertainment or brides.


A 19th Century children's book illustration of I Saw Three Ships on New Year's Day.


The earliest printed version of I Saw Three Ships is from the 17th Century around Derbyshire and was also published by William Sandys in 1833. The song was also called As I Sat On a Sunny Bank and was particularly popular in Cornwall.  Many different melodies were used and English folklorists Cecil Sharp and Janet Blunt  noted the tunes and lyrics of dozens of versions, primarily from the south of England in the first decade of the 20th Century.


In this English Christmas card the singing maidens of the New Year's version were hinted at in the figureheads of the ships.

Various arrangements have been recorded by Jean Richie Nat King Cole, Glen Campbell, Celtic Women, Sting, and even alt-rockers Bare Naked Ladies.

The Chieftains in the 1980s.

But today we enjoy a version by the revered Irish ensemble The Chieftains with vocal by Marianne Faithfull on their 1991 album The Bells of Dublin.

 

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

The Clouded Birthday and Origin of Zoroaster—Avatar of Proto-Monotheism

 

A contemporary Zoroastrian print depicting the sect's founder, prophet, and avatar.

Yesterday, March 26, was Khordad Sal celebrated as the birthday of Zoroaster also known as the Greater Noruz and which is marked six days after Noruz, the vernal equinox.  

All founders of great religions need a feast day to be celebrated by their followers.  Most often the feast is identified with the birthday, death date, transformation to godhood, or ascension to immortality.  In the case of Zoroaster, the founder of an ancient proto-monotheistic religion which blossomed in Persia (Iran) and became the state religion of vast empires, the feast is a traditional birthday.  But not only is his real birthday not known, scholars have trouble identifying the era in which he lived by margins of hundreds of years.  At least modern ones do better than the Greek historian of philosophy Diogenes and the Roman Plutarch who misdated him by several millennia at around 6,000 BCE

The Fravashi are spirit angels whose traditional depictions  are often considered a major symbol of Zoroasterism.  History Channel pseudo science bunk peddlers would have you that they are representations of aliens in their space craft.
 

The problem with dating Zoroaster is largely a problem of jibing linguistic development with known historical events.  All stories agree that Zoroaster was a priest of an already ancient and long established polytheistic religion who developed new ideas elevating the deity Ahura Mazda of wisdom, truth, and pure goodness to the status of Supreme Being and Creator, while demoting various other deities to Fravashi, roughly analogous to angels or spirit saints and demons under a Satan-like Angra Mainy who introduces the destructive mentality of the lie into the world.   Works of Holy Scriptures are attributed to him—Gathas, Yasna, Vendidad, Visperad, Yashts—which are included in an overarching Scripture that includes ritual practices, prayers, and fragments of other texts not attributed to him. 

The problem is that the oldest of his texts are in an early form of an Aryan tongue known as Avestan of which the texts are the only surviving documentation.  That would seem to date these writings, 17 poems of the Gathas, to sometime before 2,000 BCE.  But later writings, including supposed autobiographical accounts of his life were written in Persian dialects from around 600 BCE.    The great age of the Gathas is what convinced the Greeks and Romans that Zororaster’s origins were very early.

Scholars now date the historic Zoroaster to somewhere in a 200 to 300 year range centering on 600 BCE.  That would indicate that he adapted as his own far more ancient teachings and popularized them.

Then there is the problem of just where the hell Zoroaster was from.  A lot of claimants for this honor.  The earliest texts identify him as coming from Airyanem Vaejah meaning roughly the Expanse of the Aryans a/k/a the Iranians.  It may reference a fast flowing river and valley, perhaps in the southern central Asian plateau or in the north of modern Afghanistan.  These same texts fail to mention any of the well-known tribes of western Iran—the Medes, Persians, and Parthians.

Like Buddhism and Christianity a miracle birth story developed around Zoroaster/Zarathustra as illustrated in this children's book.  

Later texts, however, place him in western Iran and identify his priestly cast was the Magi of the Medes and Persians.  Modern scholars tend to dismiss the possibility of him being from western Iran and argue between themselves over points of origin from central and eastern Iran, Afghanistan, Baluchistan in western modern Pakistan, Bactria on the plateau north of the Hindu-Kush Mountains, Turkmenistan, and the vast steppes west of the Volga.  Put your money down and take your pick.

Although Zoroaster’s original autobiographical writings were thought destroyed in when Alexander the Greats Army captured Persepolis, capital of the Achaemenid Empire centered in Persia and burned the royal library there.  Or not.  Some scholars dismiss this and say that the original texts, if they existed were lost long before.  At any rate later summaries of the lost texts provide a fairly detailed biography.

Zoroaster was born into a Bronze Age Aryan culture in a priestly line, the Spitamids.  His father and mother were identified by namePoroschasp and Dughdova.  He followed the family trade but was increasingly dissatisfied with ritual practices that included animal sacrifice and the corrupt use of religion by a governing caste of princelings and soldiers to oppress the mass of common people.  He took a wife, Huvovi and together they had three sons and three daughters.

At age 30 Zoroaster was illuminated by Ahura Mazda and began preaching his revised worship of the elevated deity and his philosophy of a struggle between the forces of pure truth and goodness and those of lies and evil.  He eliminated animal sacrifice, simplified ritual, and argued against excessive religious taxes diverted to the caste of worldly rulers.  He developed a system which, for its time and place, was relatively light on miracles and magic and developed an advanced ethical philosophy.

Huvovi and his children were his first converts and his sons became his priests.  At least one daughter was said to have made a strategic marriage to a local ruler that helped spread adoption of the new religion.  Zoroaster faced many obstacles in his preaching, including the fierce opposition of traditional priests and of the nobility who felt undermined.  He was shunned and outcast in his own mother’s hometown.  Yet eventually truth and goodness—ašatriumphed over druj—the lie and much of Zoroaster’s homeland, wherever it was, was brought to the faith.

Zoroaster preaches to legendary Vishtaspa--Hystaspes to the Greeks--a king and/or Mag sage who became one of his earliest supporters and a major figure in scripture.

No mention was made of how the Master died, but later traditions have him murdered at his altar in Balkh located in Afghanistan during a Holy War between Turans—an Iranian tribe—and the Persian Empire in 583 BCE.  This tale undoubtedly owes more to politico/religious struggles for legitimacy within the Persian Empire and its successors than any historical truth.

We do know that by reign of Cyrus the Great, about 560-530 BCE, Zoroastrianism was wide-spread in his newly unified Persian Achaemenid Empire, although not yet a state religion. Through their enemies the Persians, the Greeks learned about Zoroaster and his teachings, which later became influential in their emerging philosophy though the work of Plato and others.  Likewise the empire brought it to the Jews who were also influenced, especially by Zoroastrian duality which shows up in the concepts of the struggle between light and darkness of the Essenes as evidenced in the Dead Sea Scrolls.  Through both the Greeks and the Jews it influenced Christianity and later Islam, which conquered the Zoroastrian heartland.

Zoroaster influenced Greek philosophers as well religions like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam,  In his famous painting The School of Athens Renaissance master Raphael depicted Zoroaster--the bearded figure holding the crystal globe--among the sages in the agora.

The name Zoroaster is, in fact, the Greek form of the name which has become generally used in the West.  In Persian the name is Zarathustra, which Friedrich Nietzsche adopted for his philosophical novel, Also sprach ZarathustraThus Spoke Zarathustra—in which he put his own thoughts on the death of God and the Übermensch into the old prophets mouth.


Darius the Great of the Persian Achaemenid Empire was a personal devotee of Zoroaster and after his death Zoroasterism became the State religion of the empire.

When Darius I came to the Achaemenid throne in 522 BCE he was known to be a personal devotee of Ahura Mazda, but at the time that did not necessarily mean he was a Zoroastrian.  He could still have recognized the ancient pantheon but simply dedicated himself to that divinity.  On the other hand, he may have been.  Not long after Darius died, after extending the empire from Egypt and the Levant to Trace and Macedonia in the Balkans—after failing to conquer Sparta, Athens, and the Greeks—east into India, Zoroastrianism became the state religion, although other cults were generally permitted. 

The Achaemenids fell to Alexander, but when his heirs could not maintain his eastern empire, the Parthians arose and established an Empire from eastern Asia Minor down through both sides of the Persian Gulf and east through Afghanistan.  This empire lasted from 247 BCE to 224 AD when it disintegrated after a long series of wars with the Roman Empire and the rise of the Sasanians.  This empire would also make Zoroastrianism a state religion alongside the ancient gods of the Babylonians.

The Zoroastrians had a last, long run as an imperial religion with the Sasanian Empire, which was the chief rival of the Byzantines to the east, between 224 and 651 when it finally fell to the Islamic invasion.

The Islamic Caliphate not only absorbed the entire Sasanian Empire, it quickly expanded to cover roughly the same territory as the old Achaemenid Empire and then some. 

Despite the conquest, under the Umayyad Caliphate there was little pressure put upon the local populations to abandon their traditional religions so long as they were monotheistic, their activities did not disrupt or insult Islam, and adherents paid a taxjizya which was leveled on non-Muslims living in the realm.  Over time, however, the tax grew repressive and barriers to advancement in the Caliphate encouraged many, especially among the elite and in the major cities, to convert.  After the beginning of the Crusades there was a general backlash against all religious minorities and more oppressive steps were taken, including local rioting and massacres were allowed to transpire by authorities.

During the Caliphate the Zoroastrians had adopted a stance of non-prostilazation to convince their overloads that unlike Christians they would not try to covert Muslims.  Only those born into the religion were accepted as members.  In the long run, as pressure continued on their populations, this custom, along with a traditionally low birth rate, and continued abandonment of the faith for Islam, contributed to a steady decline in numbers over the ages until only a tiny minority remained in the old Iranian and Afghan strongholds.

After a period of particularly brutal repression many adherents fled to India where they established communities on the southern west coast beginning in the 9th Century.  That community today represents the largest concentration of Zoroastrians in the world.  Known locally as the Parsis, less than 70,000 were counted in the 2001 Indian census, mostly concentrated around Mumbai.  

Modern Zoroastrian priests perform the Afrinagar ceremony.  They wear masks so that their sputum will not accidentally corrupt the pure flame of sacred fire in it's chalice-like cauldron. 

Their long isolation from their ancestral roots has resulted in customs that are sometimes at variance with traditional Zoroastrianism and mirror the Hindu communities in which they dwell.  This includes a modification of the ban on accepting those not born into the religion by accepting the children of marriages to non-Zoroastrians.  That has not, however, prevented a general population decline, hastened by emigration to the United States and Canada where there are now small communities.

Pressure in the traditional heartland has only gotten worse. The Shi’a in Iran and the Taliban Sunni in Afghanistan, as well as Islamists in the southern Caucuses have been equally zealous in their persecutions making many refugees who have to disguise their identities.  Hard numbers in these circumstances are hard to come by.  Less than 200,000 are thought to be scattered over a broad region overlapping several borders.

Today, probably fewer than one million Zoroastrians are left world-wide to celebrate their Master’s birthday.