Mildred and Richard Loving never sought the spot light but made history anyway. |
It
could not be more appropriate. Today is Loving Day, the commemoration of a Supreme Court decision that is often forgotten
but which profoundly changed America. Some folks would even like to make it a national holiday.
Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving grew up together in Caroline County, Virginia, near
neighbors and friends since he was 17 and she was 11. As she grew up friendship blossomed into
romance. As is wont to happen when
Mildred was 18, she became pregnant.
Richard had no doubts. He asked
his girlfriend to marry him. They eloped
to Washington, D.C. in 1958 then
returned home to Central Point, Virginia just north of Richmond
set up housekeeping as man and wife. A
story not unlike thousands of others.
Their
happiness was short lived. Within weeks
they were awakened to find police in their bedroom. The couple was arrested and hauled to jail
charged with a felony, “cohabiting as man and wife, against the peace and
dignity of the Commonwealth.” Richard,
you see, was white and Mildred African
American. They had violated Virginia’s
anti-miscegenation law. At the time 16 states from Delaware to Texas including those of the old Confederacy and most border
states made marriage between the races illegal.
The
young couple was understandably frightened.
They had known that it was illegal to get married in Virginia, which is
why they had gone to Washington. They
did not know that it was a crime to return and live as husband and wife.
To
avoid a prison term of one to three years each jail time the Lovings agreed to
leave Virginia, forbidden to return for 25 years tearing them away from their
respective families. They moved to Washington.
Although
their relationship was legal in Washington, the nation’s capital was still
culturally a Southern city. The couple found it difficult to secure housing
in the essentially segregated city. They had to endure street harassment from
both races when they went out together.
Richard had trouble finding work and was sometimes fired when it was
learned that he had a black wife. Even
their children were harassed. Both
missed their families. But the couple’s
love kept them together.
The
passage of land the landmark Civil
Rights Act of 1964 seemed to offer new hope. Mildred decided to write a letter to the new Attorney General, Robert F. Kennedy
asking for help. The Justice Department decided not to
intervene directly, but Kennedy was sympathetic enough to forward the Mildred’s
letter to the American Civil Liberties
Union in New York.
The
ACLU was very interested in the case
and decided to support the Loving’s appeal of their original conviction. Two lawyers, Two lawyers, Bernard S. Cohen and Philip J. Hirschkop took the case pro
bono.
The
appeal process did not go smoothly. The ACLU first appealed to the Virginia
courts arguing that the state anti-miscegenation violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s promise of equal protection under the law. When
the Virginia courts dragged their heels in hearing the case, lawyers brought a
class action suit in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. In January 1965, the
three-judge district court decided to allow the Lovings to present their
constitutional claims to the Virginia
Supreme Court of Appeals.
Virginia
Supreme Court Justice Harry L. Carrico
ruled against the couple citing the Virginia
Constitution. He also said that the
law did not violate equal protection because both defendants, regardless of
their race, received the same sentence for the violation. After modifying the original sentence to
allow the couple short visits to their families, Carrico upheld the conviction.
The
Loving’s appeal of Justice Carrico’s decision finally reached the Supreme
Court. The Lovings, who personally did
not seek the public spotlight, did not attend oral hearings but their lawyer
Bernard Cohen conveyed to the Court Richards simple personal appeal. “Mr. Cohen, tell the Court I love my wife, and
it is just unfair that I can’t live with her in Virginia.”
On
June 12, 1967 the Court stunned the nation by unanimously—and vigorously—upholding
the Loving’s appeal. In his opinion Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote:
Marriage is one
of the “basic civil rights of man,” fundamental to our very existence and
survival.... To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as
the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so
directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth
Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due
process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to
marry not be restricted by invidious racial discrimination. Under our
Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race
resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State…
… There is
patently no legitimate overriding purpose independent of invidious racial
discrimination which justifies this classification. The fact that Virginia
prohibits only interracial marriages involving white persons demonstrates that
the racial classifications must stand on their own justification, as measures
designed to maintain White Supremacy.
In
one fell swoop the anti-miscegenation of all states were rendered unenforceable. But many states were defiant in actually
removing them from the books. It was not
until 2000 that the last recalcitrant state, Alabama, repealed the ban on inter-racial marriage that had been
written into the state Constitution, when voters overwhelming approved a
referendum repealing the provision.
Since
the ruling inter-racial marriages, once both rare and dangerous, have grown
across the country and now make up more than 10% of all American marriages.
As
for the Lovings, they happily returned to Virginia where they raised their
three children. In 1971 a drunk driver
struck their car. Richard, then 51 years
old, was killed and Mildred was blinded in her right eye. She died of pneumonia on May 2, 2008 at the age of 68.
The
precedent of the Loving case also became the basis for the rash of court
decisions striking down bans on same
gender marriage and was explicitly cited in case after case. In 2007 the very private Mildred Loving
expressed her support for marriage equality:
I believe all
Americans, no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual
orientation, should have that same freedom to marry... I am still not a
political person, but I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case
that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness and the family
that so many people, black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in
life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving,
are all about.
The
annual celebration of Loving Day began at Parsons
the New School for Design in New York City with a graduate thesis project by Ken
Tanabe, a graphic designer, who accidentally discovered the Loving case
while Googling something else. The initial celebration was held in New York
in 2004 as a multi-racial, multi-cultural event and has spread across the
country via a web site and a network
of dedicated volunteers.
Many
see it as an occasion of special celebration for bi-racial and multi-racial
individuals who want to celebrate all parts of their heritage. As it spread, celebrations have been held in
many cities and especially on college
campuses. Marriage Equality supporters have also joined in the effort to
spread the celebration.
This
year the Loving Day Supporters are encouraging rallies, parades, and public
events on Saturday June 14, the weekend day closest to the actual anniversary.
Petitions
have been made asking for Loving Day to be recognized as an official national
holiday. While it is unlikely that any
holiday that includes paid days off for Federal employees, is likely to be
passed anytime soon, declarations of Loving Day as an unofficial holiday have
been passed in numerous cities and some states.
Happy
Loving Day to all. Go out and spread the
love.
As our esteemed denomination is again contemplating a more salable version of our Principles, I hereby renew my plea for an eighth principle, affirming the right of every adult to form and support the family of their own choosing.
ReplyDelete