Two
incredibly significant anniversaries are
being observed today, each ending in a fat round zero which draws extra attention to them. They couldn’t be more different, but each commemorated event shaped and changed forever
the world in which we live. Seventy
years ago on August 6, 1945 the Atomic
Bomb was first used as a weapon of
war, exploding with unprecedented devastation over Hiroshima, Japan and ushering in decades of fear known as the Nuclear
Age. Twenty years later President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 ushering in
an era of increased Black political
participation and power particularly
in the states of the old Confederacy.
Despite
the anniversary, and the fact that it comes near the end of years of special
anniversaries associated with World War
II, the defining world historical
event of the 20th Century
attention to Hiroshima seems, at least to me, to be more muted than during previous landmark anniversaries. Perhaps it has to do with the rapid fading of
the World War II generation itself.
Perhaps because a generation or
more has come of age since the demise of the old Soviet Union and with it the Sword
of Damocles threat of global
incineration that Baby Boomer like
me grew up with. Despite rising tensions
with Russia under Vladimir Putin no one expects that
country to ramp up a new nuclear arms
race or seriously threaten the United
States or its European allies
with nukes. China, the emerging polar power vs. the U.S. has not been nuclearly aggressive.
There
have been periodic scares from the Third
World—largely fantastic attempts to whip up hysteria over supposed suite
case bombs in the hands of terrorists,
the so called Islamic bomb in Pakistan which was preemptively squashed by India, periodic bluster and
chest beating threats from North Korea which have repeatedly been
shown to be nothing but empty, and Israeli
Prime Minister Netanyahu persistent attempts to drum up a war between the
U.S. and Iran over as yet undeveloped
possible nuclear arms. But Americans no
longer live with the dread of the world
coming to an end tomorrow.
We
may be too nonchalant. This year the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists which keeps close track on such
things re-set their famous Doomsday
Clock to 11:57, slightly closer to midnight.
The
U.S. Army Air Corps B-29 bomber Enola
Gay piloted by Colonel Paul Tibbets dropped a bomb on
Hiroshima at 8:15 local time as residents
were beginning their work and school days. To do justice to the occasion today, I would
have to dwell in detail on what it was like in the city that morning when “the
face of the sun seemed to kiss the earth.”
And frankly I am not up to that ever wrenching experience. Call
me a coward. Instead, for just a taste of the horror and destruction I invite you to view Hiroshima: The
Lost Photographs.
The Golden Anniversary of the Voting Rights Act might generate more
interest than usual this year because voting rights are under such relentless attack and progressive forces are now beginning to
rally to preserve them and to recoup what
has been lost since 2013 when the Supreme
Court overturned a key provision removing a critical tool to combat racial discrimination in voting. Under Section 5 of the landmark civil rights law, jurisdictions with a history
of discrimination needed to seek pre-approval
of changes in voting rules that
could affect minorities. It blocked discrimination before it occurred. In Shelby
County V. Holder the Court invalidated
Section 4—which laid out criteria
for identifying states and localities
covered by Section 5—claiming that current
conditions require a new coverage formula.
That left Section 5 intact but unenforceable. The conservative
majority on the court claimed that Congress
could easily adopt a new formula and restore enforcement, knowing full well
that with the House of Representatives in
the iron grip of reactionary Republican majorities that no remedy would be
enacted.
Since
then attacks on voting rights have intensified across the country—and not just
in the old Deep South. Republican Legislatures and Governors
have enacted waves of legislation aimed at curbing or discouraging voting by minorities and any groups of voters
suspected of possible Democratic
tendencies. In the name of fighting
a virtually nonexistent form of voter fraud—registration and voting by non-citizens misrepresenting their status—burdensome proof
of identity legislation, including
very limited numbers of approved
identification documents and fees
and charges for attaining those
documents. Places where applicants can
obtain documents have been reduced requiring burdensome travel and their hours
of operation restricted. Students have been barred from registering where they attend college, even if they life there year round. Early
voting periods have been reduced and restricted. Polling
places have been eliminated and consolidated in minority areas to guarantee long and discouraging lines. It seems
like new and creative ways to curb registration or discourage voting are
introduced every year, churned out by as model
legislation by some right wing think
tank and spreading from Red State to
Red State like a virus.
Many,
maybe even most, of these restrictions eventually get struck down in the
courts, but not before having their desired effect for an election cycle or two. With
Section 4 in place, many of these changes would have been stopped by Federal
review before they were even put in place.
Meanwhile there is a growing rank-and-file
movement to reclaim voting rights in the same way as they were first won at
bitter cost to begin with—with street protests and civil disobedience. The NAACP’s
Moral Monday movement in South
Carolina is a model for a new activism and a movement that has been called
the Selma of the 21st Century.
On August 6, 1965 President
Lyndon Johnson signed the landmark National
Voting Rights Act of 1965 in a ceremony at the White House attended by
leaders of both parties in Congress and Civil Rights leaders
including the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Benjamin Hooks.
My generation, which grew up protesting
the War in Vietnam, grew to regard Johnson as “the enemy.” Yet his record on domestic issues was
unmatched by any President except Franklin Delano Roosevelt. His Great Society programs, though far
from perfect, were the last great systematic assault on poverty
in our history. And this Texas
wheeler-dealer accomplished what Northern liberal John F. Kennedy
never could—a comprehensive legislative attack on discrimination and the
subjugation of Black citizens.
Perhaps we expected that subsequent Democratic Presidents
would take up where Johnson left off without the stain of a fruitless war. The fact is that whatever their intentions,
none of them did. The previous year the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 opened doors of public accommodations in response
to ongoing campaigns by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC),
the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), branches of the National
Association of Colored People (NAACP), and others.
But the historic pattern of restricting voting by
Blacks through the use of poll taxes, literacy tests, and
outright intimidation that was the hallmark of the Jim Crow era after
Southern Whites dismantled the reforms of post Civil War
Reconstruction, remained untouched.
With new militancy the SCLC and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating
Committee (SNCC) turned to campaigns to register voters.
That campaign took a bloody, violent turn in Selma,
Alabama earlier that year. Marchers attempting to reach the local Court
House to register were attacked and many severely beaten. Black
demonstrator, Jimmy Lee Johnson, was killed during a march in near-by Marion City. Then James Reeb, a White Unitarian Universalist Minister who had
responded to a call by Dr. King for support, was beaten to death shortly after
arriving in the city.
Johnson instinctively knew that the death of the White
minister would galvanize public sentiment and support in the way no number of
Black deaths could. A few days later a massive Selma to Montgomery march was turned back with violence at the Edmund Pettis Bridge—Bloody Sunday.
On March 15, Johnson addressed a joint session of Congress to call for the Voting Rights Act. It was
introduced in the Senate on March 18
by Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield
of Montana and Republican Minority Leader Everett Dirksen of
Illinois.
A second March to Montgomery, this time under the
protection of Federal Authorities, got underway on March 21 and arrived at the
Alabama capital for a massive rally on March 25 with the renewed purpose to
supporting the Voting Rights Act. After
the rally a white Unitarian Universalist volunteer
from Michigan, Viola Liuzzo,
was shot and killed while driving a Black demonstrator back to Selma.
That
only stepped up pressure on Congress, where despite a fierce last line of
resistance by Southern Democrats, a filibuster was broken and the measure passed the upper chamber on May 26. The vote was 77-19 with 47 Democrats in
favor, 17 opposed and 30 Republicans—who still were proud to be the party of Lincoln—in favor and 2 opposed.
Delaying
tactics and attempts at gutting the
measure by amendment slowed action
in the House of Representatives but
it passed with minor amendments on a vote of 333-85
when Congress reconvened from the Independence
Day recess on July 9. A Conference Committee reconciliation of the two versions
cleared the House on August 3 and the Senate the next day.
Johnson wasted no time scheduling a signing ceremony for August 6, just allowing enough time for major
Civil Rights figures including King and Rosa
Parks to attend.
No comments:
Post a Comment