The mushroom cloud over Hiroshima August 6, 1945. |
Two incredibly significant anniversaries are being observed today. They couldn’t be more different, but each event
shaped and changed forever the world in which we live. Seventy five years ago on August 6, 1945 the Atomic Bomb was first used as a weapon of war, exploding with unprecedented
devastation over Hiroshima, Japan and
ushering in decades of fear known as the Nuclear Age. Twenty years
later President Lyndon B. Johnson signed
the Voting Rights Act of 1965
ushering in an era of increased Black
political participation and power particularly
in the states of the old Confederacy.
Despite the anniversary, and the
fact that it comes near the end of years of special anniversaries associated
with World War II, the defining world historical event of the 20th Century attention to Hiroshima
seems, at least to me, to be more muted than
during previous landmark anniversaries.
Perhaps it has to do with the rapid fading
of the World War II generation itself.
Perhaps because a generation or
more has come of age since the demise of the old Soviet Union and with it the Sword
of Damocles threat of global
incineration that Baby Boomer like
me grew up with. Despite rising tensions
with Russia under Vladimir Putin no one expects that
country to ramp up a major new nuclear
arms race or seriously threaten the United
States or its European allies
with nukes. China, the emerging polar power vs. the U.S. has not been unclearly aggressive.
There have been periodic scares from the Third
World—largely fantastic attempts to whip up hysteria over supposed suite
case bombs in the hands of terrorists,
the so called Islamic bomb in Pakistan which was preemptively
squashed by India, periodic bluster and chest beating threats from North
Korea, and Israeli Prime Minister
Netanyahu’s persistent attempts to drum up a war between the U.S. and Iran over as yet undeveloped possible
nuclear arms. But Americans no longer
live with the dread of the world coming
to an end tomorrow.
While no one seems to be paying attention, the Doomsday Clock is set closer to midnight than ever before. |
We may be too nonchalant. This year the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists which keeps close track on such
things re-set their famous Doomsday
Clock to 100 minutes to Midnight,
the most alarming re-set ever which reflected North Korean efforts, the collapse of agreements by Iran to suspend
weapon development, and the general
instability of the world largely due to Donald Trump’s feckless policies and population pressures from accelerating climate change.
The devastation in Hiroshima. |
The U.S. Army Air Corps B-29 bomber Enola Gay piloted by Colonel Paul Tibbets dropped a bomb on Hiroshima at 8:15 local time
as residents were beginning their work and school days. To do justice
to the occasion today, I would have to dwell
in detail on what it was like in the city that morning when “the face of
the sun seemed to kiss the earth.” And
frankly I am not up to that ever wrenching
experience. Call me a coward.
Instead, for just a taste of the horror
and destruction I invite you to view
Hiroshima: The Lost Photographs.
The anniversary of the Voting
Rights Act might generate more interest than usual this year because voting
rights are under such relentless attack and
because of the deaths of voting rights champions Congressman John Lewis and Rev.
C.T. Vivian. Progressive forces are
now rallying to preserve them and to recoup what
has been lost since 2013 when the Supreme
Court overturned a key provision to
combat racial discrimination in
voting.
Under Section 5 of the landmark civil rights law, jurisdictions with a history
of discrimination needed to seek pre-approval
of changes in voting rules that could affect
minorities. It blocked discrimination
before it occurred. In Shelby County V. Holder the Court invalidated Section 4—which laid out criteria for identifying states and localities covered by Section 5—claiming that current conditions require a new
coverage formula. That left Section
5 intact but unenforceable. The conservative
majority on the court claimed that Congress
could easily adopt a new formula and restore enforcement, knowing full well
that with the House of Representatives in
the iron grip of reactionary Republican majorities that
no remedy would be enacted.
Since then attacks on voting rights
have intensified across the country—and not just in the old Deep South. Republican Legislatures and Governors
have enacted waves of legislation aimed at curbing or discouraging voting by minorities and any groups of voters
suspected of possible Democratic
tendencies. In the name of fighting
a virtually nonexistent form of voter fraud—registration and voting by non-citizens misrepresenting their status—burdensome proof
of identity legislation, including
very limited numbers of approved
identification documents and fees
and charges for attaining those
documents. Places where applicants can
obtain documents have been reduced requiring burdensome travel and their hours
of operation restricted. Students have been barred from registering where they attend college, even if they life there year round. Early
voting periods have been reduced and restricted. Polling
places have been eliminated and consolidated in minority areas to guarantee long and discouraging lines. It seems
like new and creative ways to curb registration or discourage voting are introduced
every year, churned out by as model
legislation by some right wing think
tank and spreading from Red State to
Red State like a virus.
Many, maybe even
most, of these restrictions eventually get struck down in the courts, but not
before having their desired effect for an election
cycle or two. With Section 4 in
place, many of these changes would have been stopped by Federal review before
they were even put in place.
Meanwhile there
is a growing rank-and-file movement
to reclaim voting rights in the same way as they were first won at bitter cost to begin with—with street protests and civil disobedience. The NAACP’s
Moral Monday movement in South
Carolina is a model for a new activism and a movement that has been called
the Selma of the 21st Century.
On August 6, 1965 President Lyndon Johnson signed the landmark National Voting Rights Act of 1965
in a ceremony at the White House attended by leaders of both parties in Congress
and Civil Rights leaders including the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and
Benjamin Hooks.
My generation,
which grew up protesting the War in Vietnam, grew to regard
Johnson as “the enemy.” Yet his record
on domestic issues was unmatched by any President except Franklin
Delano Roosevelt. His Great
Society programs, though far from perfect, were the last great systematic
assault on poverty in our history.
And this Texas wheeler-dealer accomplished what Northern liberal
John F. Kennedy never could—a comprehensive legislative attack on
discrimination and the subjugation of Black citizens.
Perhaps we
expected that subsequent Democratic Presidents would take up where
Johnson left off without the stain of a fruitless war. The fact is that whatever their intentions,
none of them did. The previous year the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 opened doors of public accommodations in response
to ongoing campaigns by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC),
the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), branches of the National
Association of Colored People (NAACP), and others.
But the
historic pattern of restricting voting by Blacks through the use of poll
taxes, literacy tests, and outright intimidation that was the
hallmark of the Jim Crow era after Southern Whites dismantled the
reforms of post-Civil War Reconstruction, remained untouched. With new militancy the SCLC and the Student
Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) turned to campaigns to
register voters.
That
campaign took a bloody, violent turn in Selma, Alabama earlier that
year. Marchers attempting to reach the local Court House to register
were attacked and many severely beaten. Black demonstrator, Jimmy Lee
Johnson, was killed during a march in near-by Marion City. Then James
Reeb, a White Unitarian Universalist
Minister who had responded to a call by Dr. King for support, was beaten to
death shortly after arriving in the city.
Johnson
instinctively knew that the death of the White minister would galvanize public
sentiment and support in the way no number of Black deaths could. A few days
later a massive Selma to Montgomery march
was turned back with violence at the Edmund
Pettis Bridge—Bloody Sunday.
On March 15,
Johnson addressed a joint session of
Congress to call for the Voting Rights Act. It was introduced in the Senate on March 18 by Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield of
Montana and Republican Minority Leader Everett Dirksen of Illinois.
A second March
to Montgomery, this time under the protection
of Federal Authorities, got underway
on March 21 and arrived at the Alabama capital for a massive rally on March 25
with the renewed purpose to supporting the Voting Rights Act. After the rally a white Unitarian
Universalist volunteer from Michigan, Viola Liuzzo, was shot and killed while
driving a Black demonstrator back to Selma.
That only stepped up pressure on
Congress, where despite a fierce last
line of resistance by Southern
Democrats, a filibuster was broken and the measure passed the upper
chamber on May 26. The vote was 77-19
with 47 Democrats in favor, 17 opposed and 30 Republicans—who still were proud to be the party of Lincoln—in
favor and 2 opposed.
Delaying tactics and attempts at gutting the measure by amendment slowed action in the House of Representatives but it passed
with minor amendments on a vote of 333-85 when Congress
reconvened from the Independence Day recess
on July 9. A Conference Committee reconciliation
of the two versions cleared the House on August 3 and the Senate the next
day.
Johnson wasted no time scheduling a signing ceremony for August 6, just allowing
enough time for major Civil Rights figures including King and Rosa Parks to attend.
No comments:
Post a Comment