Fausto Sozzini—Faustus Socinus
in Latin—was an Italian theologian who helped shaped the unitarianism of the
Polish Brethren. Called in this
engraving “The Great Heretic.”
|
Note--The usually impenetrable command bunker of Heretic, Rebel, a Thing to Flout was rendered inoperable by an insidious attack of weather. We suspect CIA sabotage. So enjoy this late repeat post.
On November 17,
1599 the Polish magnate John
Saieninius, the ruler of Krakow,
after listening carefully to a debate between an orthodox Calvinist and a member of the non-Trinitarian
Polish Brethren abandoned his
conventional Reformed Church affiliation
and converted to proto-unitarianism. Afterword he, and later his son, extended
their protection and financial support to the struggling school and seminary at
nearby Rakow and its press, which
was soon flooding Europe with
elegantly written arguments for unitarianism in Latin, still the universal language of the learned.
Only the most
devoted students of the development of the Radical
Reformation and the origins of unitarianism are even dimly aware of these
developments. Most of us know the Poland
of today as the most intensively Catholic
nation in Europe and a bastion of conservatism within the Church. But Poland in the 16th Century was a very different place. Heavily forested in the south and marked by
sweeping plains and steppes in the north, it was vastly under populated due to
a history of being an invasion corridor for armies on the way to someplace
else. It was also on the fringe of the
Catholic world, far from the firm grip of Rome.
As the religious wars of the Reformation
and Counter-Reformation periods
wracked much of Western Europe, Poland basked in benign neglect.
The mid 16th
Century was a period of rare general peace in Poland. Never succumbing to the siren call of absolute monarchy that was turning much
of Europe into a blood bath, Polish kings, who held little authority, were not
even hereditary, they were elected with a rule of unanimity by the
nobility. When the nobles could not
agree on a candidate, well there might just not be a king for a while. The feudal nobles, on the other hand, exerted
enormous power over their lands. Given
their relative isolation, it is somewhat surprising that many of them were
among the most educated of their class in Europe, eagerly importing both books
and personal tutors from the west. Many
of them were very open to new ideas, and were safe to explore them without
either a powerful church or king looking over their shoulders.
The same
magnates were also eager to bring new settlers into their lands to make them
productive—and valuable sources of taxation.
Thus Poles welcomed refugees and persecuted minorities from far and wide
and were willing to wink at their heresies
and heterodoxies. Which is why Jews, mercilessly persecuted almost everywhere else were given
refuge to establish their rich shtetl
culture there.
Also welcomed
were members of the Brethren, a pietistic sect growing out of Lutheranism that emphasized personal
spiritual life, the “priesthood of all believers,” individual study and
interpretation of scripture, living
a life reflecting Christ-like simplicity
and charity, believers’ baptism, rationality
in religious debate, and tolerance of religious differences. They also tended to be pacifistic and tried
to stay out of the religious wars tearing apart Germany and the Netherlands from
which many of them came. The Brethren
were equally unpopular with Lutherans and Catholics, and persecuted by
both. Many fled to Poland and were
welcomed because of their reputation as thrifty hard workers.
Some of those
Brethren were followers of Obbe Phillips
and Menno Simons, Dutch preachers who denied the Trinity. Rudolph
Martin was particularly active in spreading this doctrine and as early as
1549 was preaching it in Krakow and finding an appreciative audience not only
among the immigrants, but among the local aristocracy. Soon other Brethren from Switzerland, Germany, Moravia
and the Habsburg territories
made their way to Poland as persecution became ever more severe and because of King Sigismund II policy of tolerance
of a non-Trinitarian view of Christ, believers’ baptism and freedom of Biblical
study. Martin’s teaching spread widely
among them, and among receptive nobles.
At the same
time more conventional Lutherans and Calvinists were making inroads themselves
and the Catholic Church seemed both in disarray and retreat. Determined to win back Poland, the Jesuits came in 1564, just as the
Polish Brethren were beginning to flower as a mature movement, and for fifty
years worked surreptitiously to end toleration and reimpose Roman Catholicism.
In 1558 a Synod was held at Princzow that helped organize, however loosely, the Brethren as a
distinct religious movement. That synod
was addressed by Blandrata an Italian dissenter from the Piedmont who was at the time one of the
leading anti-Trinitarians. Other
prominent western dissenters came either seeking refuge or viewing Poland as
fertile ground.
None were more important than Fausto Sozzini, known best by his Latin name Faustus Socinus. Another Italian, he was on the run from the Inquisition when he arrived in Poland via Romania where he had established warm relations with another group of Brethren. Despite agreeing with the Brethren on almost all major theological points, Socinus refused baptism and was thus never able to either join the sect or wield any official position. But he soon became the trusted advisor to Brethren leaders who appreciated his deep scholarship and integrity. Over the years he became the unofficial chief theologian of the Polish Brethren and moved them from crude anti-Trinitarianism toward positive unitarianism. Later the Jesuits and other enemies would brand the Brethren as Socinians, a label that they rejected as they also objected to being called Anabaptists.
In 1569 Rakow
was established as a Brethren community just north east of Krakow. It quickly became the spiritual and
intellectual hub of the spreading community.
Cooperative farms and orchards supported a small school and eventually a
print shop. Within a few years the shop
was producing books and tracts on Brethren theology and other topics in
Latin. Intended for instruction locally,
the books were of such high quality that they soon began circulating in
pietistic and Reform circles throughout Europe.
When Rakow came
under the sponsorship of the Saieninius family at the turn of the century, the
school was able to expand into full college, famous throughout Europe for the
quality of its instruction and attracting scholars and students not just from
the local Brethren but from many of the “best families in Europe.” More than 1000 students regularly studied
there.
The press got
even busier. Around 1605 the Racovian Catechism was drawn up by
three noted Brethren scholars, Smaltzy,
Moscorovy and Volkel. This famous book
went through many editions, it declared that it was for and by the “Brethren in
Poland and Lithuania who confess One God the Father.” It was the clearest and frankest exposition
of biblically based unitarianism yet made.
The work was especially compelling for its calmness of reasoning and its
refrain from attacking the theological views of opponents, unlike the openly
contemptuous sarcasm that the martyred Michel
Servetus had heaped on opponents in his earlier writing. The quality of the book made it especially
dangerous and it was banned in many places by Catholic, Lutherans, and
Calvinists alike. Mere position of the
book was made an offense subject to burning at the stake for heresy by decree
of that Defender of the Faith King Henry VII of England.
Despite the
growing storms of opposition abroad, the early 17th Century was the glory days of the Polish Brethren. Many of the nobles and gentry who converted
to the faith made a display of living as did Christ by abolishing serfdom on
their estates, establishing farming communes, and renouncing the privileges of
rank to be part of the Christian community.
Needless to say, this trend alarmed other nobles, even other Reform
members. They threw their lot in with
the on-going Jesuit plan to crush the Brethren.
By the 1620’s
the Jesuits were appealing to the still largely Catholic class of serfs to turn
against the Brethren, whose cooperative communities and orderly farms were far
more prosperous than the tiny plots they were allowed to farm for their own
families. Although Poles of all classes
had joined the Brethren, many of them were still either immigrants or the
descendents of immigrants and many of their leaders had German, rather than
Polish names. The classic politics of
resentment and tribalism worked well. Slavic peasants began to riot against
the Brethren and attack their churches and schools.
Soon where
local magnates were Catholic, prosecution of members of the Brethren on various
charges minor and major was stepped up.
As early a 1611 John Tyscoviski of Bielsko was charged with refusing to swear by a triune God in court and was tortured
and put to death in Warsaw. He was just the first. Brethren and other “heretics” isolated in
majority Catholic areas were at first the targets while those on lands
protected by local magnates and nobles were safer.
An indiscretion
by riotous students at the College in Rakow in 1638 gave Catholic authorities
the long sought after excuse to close the school for good, scatter its
students, and end it pesky publishing.
The next year
1639 Katherine Weigel (often
called Catherine Vogel in the West), an 80 year old Catholic convert to Judaism
was burned at the stake after being imprisoned for ten years for denying
the Trinity. Although she was a Judenizer,
rather than a member of the Brethren, her death in the capital of the
Brethren heartland, was a pointed warning of what was to come.
By the 1650’s Poland reverted to one
of its periodic episodes of chaos. Austrians and Romanians were attacking in the south and Polish nobles battled
invading Tartars and Cossacks in the north. Much of the later fighting took place around
Krakow. The peaceful Brethren tried to
remain neutral, while Jesuit agents bribed the Cossacks to attack and burn Brethren
estates, churches, and communes.
When the Swedes conquered Poland driving out King Casmir, the Brethren, like the
Calvinists and Catholics, were required to swear loyalty to the Swedish
King. When Casmir later rallied his
forces and expelled the Swedes, the Brethren never formally renounced their
oath of loyalty although they had offered the Swedes no support and as was
their custom tried to maintain peaceful neutrality. The Jesuits whipped up a storm, accusing the
Brethren of being agents of a foreign enemy.
As a result in
1658 the Polish Diet proclaimed:
The toleration granted to dissenters from
the church does not legally extend to the unitarians whom they call
anabaptists, this being a new heresy. Therefore all who within such a limited
time will not embrace the Roman Catholic religion shall be banished out of
Poland; allowing, however, two years to sell their estates, whether real or
personal.
Even before the
two years were up, authorities ignored widespread riots against the community
and seizures of their property.
In 1660, right
on schedule the expulsion began with ruthless efficiency. The Brethren were scattered to uncertain
fates in Prussia, Silesia, Moravia, and Russia. Some
were welcomed into existing, by non-unitarian Brethren groups, others were
persecuted by local authorities and driven underground. A few hundred managed to get to Transylvania to join Unitarians already there. Many migrated
to the Netherlands, a few even reached England. In this they were helped by
members of the congregations founded through the influence of John Biddle
—best known to
Americans as the founder of dissenting group we know as the Pilgrims.
.
The Polish
Brethren passed into history. Their
influence did not. In exile they
continued to publish and circulate clandestine copies of the Racovian Catechism into the next
century. Those books were passed hand to
hand and treasured. They came into the
hands of the English Dissenters who
became Unitarian and who were called Socinians by their enemies.
The triumphant
Catholics of Poland soon turned their attention to the Lutherans and Calvinists
and they, too, were crushed. As Poland
was repeatedly invaded, divided, and re-divided over the next centuries,
Catholicism became the unifying banner of Polish nationalism. To this day, you will find no monuments or
markers commemorating the once vibrant flowering of Polish religious
tolerance.
No comments:
Post a Comment