This
is the Sunday before Memorial Day. For a lot of folks it’s just the middle
of a long weekend and the start of summer.
And that’s ok. You can go
elsewhere to be scolded for forgetting the sacrifices of the war dead. Just about every newspaper in the country
will serve up an editorial on the subject plus letters from the VFW.
But a lot of us do hold it in our hearts for very compelling and complex
reasons. And those of us who go to church services this morning will hear
various reflections on the meaning.
My
Unitarian Universalists, who tend to
be, on the whole, anti-war folks,
often find themselves conflicted. How do
we honor the final sacrifices of warriors
without necessarily honoring or glorifying war
itself? How can we express sincere love
of country while acknowledging its frequent errors and injustice? Can we
place our hands over our hearts and bow our heads as a distant Taps
is blown and a flag is lowered to half-staff
without feeling hypocritical? Can we twist a Poppy around a button without embracing the jingoism of some veterans’ organizations? It was F. Scott Fitzgerald who reminded us
that “The test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing
ideas at the same time and continue to function.” As for me, I choose to lay my
symbolic wreath on the memorials to departed souls.
The
question for some might be which souls.
Do some get left out?
Remembrance
of the war dead is all well and good.
But, especially in modern wars, soldiers, sailors, and airmen are only a
fraction of the victims. Civilians, both
those who just “got in the way”—collateral
damage in the cold, efficient jargon of the military—and those murdered as
a matter of tactics and policy dwarf the dead in uniforms.
Despite international treaties and high
minded and high flown declarations of
noble intent by governments, insurgents, and other involved factions, the accepted
dogma of modern warfare is that civilian deaths, the more brutal and
indiscriminate the better, will “demoralize” the enemy and “sap them of the
will to resist.”
This is
utter hogwash. It has never been the
case. Civilian deaths simply inflame the
passions of the targeted peoples, raise their determination to both resist—and
if possible wreck vengeance. It also
sets up generational resentments and enmities that threaten to rekindle
conflicts again and again.
Ask the
“indomitable” people of London. Or for that matter the Germans under Allied carpet bombing
or the Japanese whose wood and paper
cities flashed over in fire storms
even before we dropped atomic weapons
on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Although
the Axis Powers were eventually
overwhelmed by superior military and
industrial capacity, the war was not
shortened by even one day by demoralization due to civilian deaths. Even in the case of the Atomic bomb
drops—which were widely viewed as forcing the Empire of Japan to surrender before a hugely costly invasion of the
Home Islands—it was not the
vaporization of the population of two cities that caused the ultimate
surrender, but the calculation of the General
Staff that the military would be rendered useless by atomic attacks on
their forces and equipment.
Modern Terrorism is the war of the weak
against the strong. And it assumes that
enough mayhem will break the will of whatever presumed oppressor. But there is no real difference between
leaving a bomb in a mailbox and flattening a neighborhood with drones. It is simply a matter of scale and
technological sophistication.
All modern war is, in essence, terrorism.
In the
mid 1990’s I was asked to write a poem for a Memorial Day Sunday service at the Congregational Unitarian Church in Woodstock. I was asked to
write something that memorialized ALL of the war dead. Using the headlines of the day—a time when
our nation was supposedly at peace but while much of the world was at war—this
is what I came up with:
In The Century of Death
They
are like that grainy photo on page six
of a million tires burning somewhere in New Jersey.
We shake our heads
and click our tongues
with disapproval and dismay,
reflect a split second
before we turn the page
and hurry on to check out
Ann Landers,
the crossword puzzle,
National League standings
or the price of gold in London.
of a million tires burning somewhere in New Jersey.
We shake our heads
and click our tongues
with disapproval and dismay,
reflect a split second
before we turn the page
and hurry on to check out
Ann Landers,
the crossword puzzle,
National League standings
or the price of gold in London.
They
are the dead,
an uncounted century
of waste and carnage,
stacked as carelessly and deep
as those tires,
alike the cast off refuse
of industrial efficiency.
an uncounted century
of waste and carnage,
stacked as carelessly and deep
as those tires,
alike the cast off refuse
of industrial efficiency.
And like those tires they earn
a moment of our passing pity
in the rush of our busy lives
between work and soccer practice,
haircut and committee meeting.
Unless
by accident we are near
and a pungent change of wind
stings our noses and eyes with acrid smoke
and oily ash drifts
onto our own innocent cheeks.
and a pungent change of wind
stings our noses and eyes with acrid smoke
and oily ash drifts
onto our own innocent cheeks.
—Patrick
Murfin
Note: This
poem appeared in my Skinner House
Meditation Manual, We Build Temples in
the Hart, published in 2004 in Boston
Stunning. Cuts right through all gloss, rhetoric, and bullshit. Thank you for confronting and for your fine skills and vision as writer and poet.
ReplyDelete