It may not have been entirely co-incidental that the United States Congress chose July 14,
1798 to pass the Sedition Act, one
of a bundle of laws known collectively
as the Alien and Sedition Acts. It was, after all, also the 10th anniversary of the Storming of the Bastille by the Paris Mob, a symbolic beginning to the French
Revolution.
That Revolution had terrified the dominant Federalist Party,
staunch defenders of order, authority, and absolute property rights. In
the ten years since the Bastille event, the French Revolution had spun out of control—not only was the ancient monarchy deposed and the Royal Family mostly separated from their heads, but a series of new governments unleashed a
broader Reign of Terror and an ever more radical agenda.
The fledgling political parties—the Federalists of Washington, Hamilton,
and Adams and the Democratic-Republicans of Jefferson and Madison had come into existence become largely by opposition to
the French on one side and general approval and support on the other.
As Washington left office tensions rose. John
Adams was elected President as a
Federalist, but his former friend
and collaborator Jefferson, the acknowledged leader of the Republicans,
was elected Vice-President under the
original Constitutional provision that gave those posts to the winner of the majority of votes in the Electoral College and the next highest vote getter respectively. Federalists also controlled both houses of Congress and comprised virtually the
entire federal Judiciary.
Despite calls by the Republicans for
even handed neutrality in the war between Revolutionary France and the
British and other European powers, Anglophile Federalists tilted
heavily toward their old colonial
Mother Country and against former ally France. They also refused to pay the American Revolutionary
War debt to France on the grounds that the commitment was to the former
monarchy, not the revolutionary
Republic.
This enraged French revolutionary
authorities. By 1796 France refused to accept a new American Minister
and began raiding American shipping
suspected of being in communication
with the British. Tensions mounted further with the XYZ Affair in which French diplomats
demanded a large bribe to restore
diplomatic relations with the U.S.
As commercial shipping losses mounted, Congress authorized the construction or
purchase of a new Navy of up to 12 ships, including modern frigates mounting up to 22 guns.
The so-called Quasi War broke out
in earnest when Congress rescinded
all of its treaty obligations to France on July 7, 1798 followed a few days
later with an authorization for the
infant Navy to attack French warships.
To all of this the Republicans vigorously objected. The highly
partisan press on both sides were scathing
in their denunciations of each other.
The always thin skinned Adams
was wounded and outraged by attacks on him
as a British agent, monarchist, aristocrat, and personal insults his appearance
and demeanor. Members of Congress
were hardly less abusive. Adams called on Congress to act against his tormentors citing them
as traitors in the war with France.
The official text of the Sedition Act's opening paragraphs as published by Congress. |
The Federalist Congress, over the voracious objection of the
Republican minority, was glad to oblige. The Alien and Sedition Acts were actually four separate measures:
The
Naturalization Act extended the
duration of residence required for
aliens to become citizens of the United States from five years to fourteen years.
The Alien
Act authorized the President to personally order the deportation of any
alien he determined was “dangerous to the peace and safety of the United
States.” This provision was set to expire two years after being enacted.
The Enemy
Alien Act authorized the President to order the arrest and deportation of any
aliens from a nation at war with the
United States. This is the only one of the Alien and Sedition Acts
still in full force today and was cited in the internment of Japanese, German, and Italian national
during World War II. Right wing commentators have argued that it
could and should be used against Arab
and other Islamic minorities as part
of the War on Terrorism and Donald Trump has cited it as justification for his anti-immigrant and Islamic policies.
The
Sedition Act made it a Federal crime to “publish
false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government or individual officials.
By extension it was expected
to bar similar verbal speech. It had a sunset provision, set to expire
on Adams’s last day in office in
March of 1801. This was obviously so
that if Adam’s lost re-election a
Republican president could not turn the
law’s provisions against Federalists.
Editor Benjamin Franklin Bache, first victim. |
Adams
was so distraught by criticism that
he did not wait for the Sedition Act
to pass Congress before ordering the arrest of Republican editor Benjamin Franklin Bache, the grandson
of his superior in the Mission to France during the
Revolutionary War, Benjamin Franklin. Bache, in his newspaper The Aurora had criticized
George Washington’s administration
and attacked Adams as “blind, bald,
crippled, toothless, querulous,” and a nepotistic
aristocrat. Bache was arrested on common law libel two weeks
before the new law was enacted and then recharged
when it came into effect. The unfortunate journalist died of Yellow Fever later that year while awaiting trial. Before a partisan Federalist judiciary he faced certain conviction, a hefty fine and long sentence.
In
all twenty-five men were arrested
under the Sedition Act and 11 came to
trial. All who faced Federalist judges were convicted. Among the more
noteworthy victims of the law were:
James
Thomson Callender, a Scottish citizen exiled from home for his radical writings. He was charged for his book The
Prospect Before Us. Tried before
Associate Supreme Court Justice Samuel
Chase, the most voraciously partisan of Federalist judges, presiding in Circuit Court and as was then the
custom. Callender was not allowed to
argue that the Sedition Act was unconstitutional. He was convicted, fined $200, and sentenced
to nine months in prison. Like the
others convicted, he was pardoned by Jefferson when he assumed the Presidency
after the Revolution of 1800
Congressman
Mathew Lyon of Vermont was arrested for an article
published in the Vermont Journal insulting
Adams. After his arrest the defiant Irish born Congressman began
his own publication, Lyon’s Republican Magazine. He was convicted,
fined $1,000, and sentenced to four
months in prison. While in jail he was re-elected to Congress in 1800.
He cast the deciding vote for
Thomas Jefferson in the House of Representatives when the
presidential election resulted in an Electoral
College tie between Jefferson and Aaron
Burr, his Republican running mate.
The greatest miscarriages of justice were the prosecutions of ordinary citizens.
In Newark, New Jersey Luther Baldwin was in the crowd watching President Adams being welcomed to town. When cannon
salutes were fired someone joked,
“There goes the President and they are firing at his ass,” to which Brown was
overheard to reply “I don’t care if they fire through his ass.” For this he was arrested and charged with “seditious words tending to defame the
President and Government of the United States.” He was fined
$100.
But that was mild compared to the fate of David
Brown of Dedham, Massachusetts. In November 1798 he and his friends had the temerity to erect one of the symbols of the French Revolution, a Liberty Pole emblazoned with the words “No
Stamp Act, No Sedition Act, No Alien Bills, No Land Tax, downfall to the
Tyrants of America; peace and
retirement to the President; Long
Live the Vice President.” Arrested
and unable to stand bail of $4,000—a then astronomical sum that even the richest
Americans would have had trouble raising in cash—he was taken to Salem, a Federalist stronghold. He was held until his trial the following
June. When he refused to name those who assisted him in erecting the Liberty
Pole, he was convicted, fined $480 and sentenced
to eighteen months in prison—the longest
sentence given to any victim of the law.
During
the entire period in which the
Sedition Act was in place, no charges
were brought against Federalist journalists or speakers who attacked the Vice President and Republican
law makers with every bit as much
vigor and vitriol as Republicans did against the President. Enforcement
was clearly political.
Republican
leaders Jefferson and James Madison
struggled to find a way to counter the obvious tyranny of the law. Despite Madison’s preferences for a stronger central government than Jefferson would
have preferred they jointly drafted
the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions
which denounced the Act as an attack
on Constitutionally protected freedom of
press, speech, and assembly and asserted
the right of individual states to retain their natural rights which the voluntarily ceded to the Federal Government
and to nullify Federal laws which breech those rights. Although the
Resolutions were never enacted, they
became the philosophical foundation
of subsequent Southern claims of state sovereignty and what became known as the
Doctrine of Nullification.
Naturally,
the Sedition Act became one of the hot
button issues of the Election of 1800.
Most Americans, including many moderate
Federalists, were aghast at the
overt attack on hard won liberties of speech and press. The Republicans were swept to power by large majorities.
Not only did Jefferson ascend to
the Presidency, but Republicans took both
the House of Representatives and the Senate
and won several governorships
and control of state legislatures. The Federalists were dealt a blow from which
they never recovered. Soon they were
reduced to a New England regional rump
party and they disappeared entirely
after the War of 1812.
In
office, Jefferson pardoned those
convicted under the act. He personally contributed to several of the victims were financially ruined by persecution. But he could not repeal the Act, because it expired
with the Adams’ administration.
The
Sedition Act was never ruled
unconstitutional. Federal courts did not assert the right to make such a
ruling until Chief Justice John
Marshall asserted it in the case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Which is probably
a good thing because the overwhelmingly Federalist Judiciary would have undoubtedly upheld the act.
Various
later Supreme Court decisions have
mentioned the Act and assumed that it
was unconstitutional. As Justice William O. Douglas wrote in an
opinion in 1964, “The Alien and Sedition Laws constituted one of our sorriest chapters; and I had thought we had
done with them forever...Suppression of
speech as an effective police measure is an old, old device, outlawed by our
Constitution.”
Unfortunately
the ghost of the Sedition Act will
not stay still. It was cited in the complete
breakdown of civil liberties and wide-spread
persecutions, prosecutions, jailing, and
deportations by the Wilson Administration during World War I and the Red Scare that followed. It was the justification for the mass
round-up and detention in
concentration camps of immigrants
and Japanese/American citizens alike in World War II. In the McCarthy Era Red Scare reboot Congress authorized the construction of the McCarran Act Camps for Communists, Socialists, and so called Fellow Travelers. Although the camps were never used new possible
targets have been proposed to fill them
from Black Panthers and Hippy anti-war protestors in the ‘60’s to American Muslims after 9/11. Most recently it has
been suggested that the camps could be used to hold illegal immigrants after a vast martial law type national sweep.
Neo-con intellectuals resurrected it as part of their theory of the Unitary Power of the Executive during the dismal reign of George W. Bush. They asserted that in matters of “national security”
the President has virtually
unlimited power in time of war or
“emergency” to take whatever
measures he deems necessary, including superseding
“ordinary” Constitutional restraints, in the “protection of the homeland.”
Many features
of the Alien and Sedition Acts, including criminalizing
certain speech and associations,
were incorporated into the massive and
complex Patriot Act hastily adopted
after the 9/11 attacks and extended by subsequent Congresses.
Are Trump's increasingly hysterical attacks on the press the first steps to invoking the Sedition Act and a coup against democracy and Constitutional protections? |
Now
a besieged President with even thinner skin than old John Adams
is already in a verbal war with the
press over so-called fake news and
has openly shared is admiration for strongmen and brutal dictators. With a noose of public indignation and legal peril tightening around his neck,
will the Cheeto-in-Charge turn to
the Sedition Act in desperation?
Stay tuned….
No comments:
Post a Comment