The wreckage of Port Chicago after the explosion. |
At precisely 10:18 pm on July 17,
1944 an Army Air Force pilot flying at 9,000 feet saw pieces of white hot metal, some as large as a house, fly straight up past him.
The plane was not flying over a
war zone. It was cruising above the San Francisco Bay area directly above Port Chicago on the southern banks of Suisun Bay, The plane and its crew narrowly avoided becoming additional casualties in the worst domestic loss of life and property in America during World War II. Below them a pier with two ships, a railroad locomotive, and more than 350 men—80% of them Black U.S. Navy ammunition loaders were
virtually vaporized in an explosion equal to the power of 2,000 tons of TNT—the equivalent of a small atomic weapon.
Port Chicago, about 30 miles north
of San Francisco, was a busy place. To keep up with munitions demand in the Pacific
Theater, it was developed into a munitions facility when the Naval
Ammunition Depot at Mare Island
could not fully supply the war effort. By the summer of 1944, expansion of the Port Chicago facility
allowed for loading two ships at once
around the clock.
Locomotives brought trainloads of munitions—everything from
small arms ammunition, to Naval ordinance, to air craft bombs of all sizes—to the dockside, each box car crammed to capacity with explosives. The trains waited on sidings separated by
concrete blast walls for safety until they were ready to roll onto the pier. There were births for two cargo ships, one on
each side.
The box cars were unloaded by hand all-Black gangs of
ammunition loaders under the direct supervision of Black petty officers and largely inexperienced
white junior officers. Separate gangs worked
transferring the munitions to the
two docked ships, hoisted aboard in cargo nets by winch and crane. Loading operations continued in shifts around
the clock. It took an average of four days labor to fill each
ship, but with more ships in the bay
awaiting a birth, the men were driven
to speed up operations both by aggressive petty officers and by offers of rewards in speed loading
competition. Corners were cut.
The use of exclusively Black labor
gangs for ammunition loading and other dangerous and unpleasant duties was a product of a culture of rigid segregation in the Navy. Historically
Blacks had served in all enlisted capacities and on shipboard from the birth of
the Navy through World War I. In some eras, particularly under sail, they often represent up to 25% of personnel on some ships. Then Jim Crow went to sea. In the ‘20’s Blacks were limited to duties as cooks,
messmates, and stewards. Old time seamen were “allowed” to remain until retirement, but in fact most were forced out before that by hostile officers and crews. Then attempts were made to replace even the cooks and stewards
with Filipinos.
After Pearl Harbor the enormous
manpower needs of the Navy made it
reluctantly return to recruiting Blacks.
They used Ships Cook Dorie Miller
who won the Navy Cross for manning a
machine gun against attacking Japanese planes that day as a
poster boy for recruitment in Black neighborhoods. But except for mess duty and servile
functions, they were still generally restricted
from sea duty and confined to general
service ashore in segregated units
under white officers.
The Navy had a system for sorting sailors by fitness ratings
based on intelligence tests, education, physical fitness, psychological
evaluation, age, and discipline records. Blacks assigned duty as ammunition
handlers were drawn from a pool of the
bottom 60% of recruits and The Navy’s General
Classification Test (GCT)
results for the enlisted men at Port Chicago averaged 31, putting them in the lowest twelfth of the Navy. Supervising petty officers there also had
below average ratings on average because the best and most effective ones were quickly transferred to other duties.
The Navy would later use the excuse that this “substandard” force was incompetent and irresponsible. Even if true, it begs the question of why the Navy enforced a system the purposefully selected just such men for the dangerous duty.
On the day of the explosion two
ships were docked. The Liberty ship, SS E.A. Bryan, after four
days of loading, had about 4,600 tons of ammunition and explosives on board,
about 40% of its capacity. A gang of with men 98 was loading her. On the
other side of the dock the Victory ship SS
Quinault Victory preparing its maiden
voyage was being rigged to receive
cargo by a 102 man gang, but one which was made up largely of new and
inexperienced men.
Black work gangs unload a box car of aerial bombs by hand at Port Chicago. There was intense pressure to speed up operations to meet the needs of the war in the Pacific Theater. |
The Bryan already had on board or being loaded 1,000-pound bombs in No. 3
hold, 40 mm shells in No. 5 hold and fragmentation cluster bombs in No.
4 hold, 650 lb. Incendiary bombs—live with fuses installed—were being
loaded carefully one at a time into No.
1 hold—a hold with a winch brake
that had recently been inoperative
and may still have been so. A boxcar delivery containing a new airborne anti-submarine depth charge,
the Mark 47 armed with 252 lbs. of torpex explosives, was being loaded
into No. 2 hold. The torpex charges
were more sensitive than TNT to external shock and container dents.
Also on the dock were on three parallel rail spurs, were a steam
locomotive and sixteen rail cars holding
about 430 short tons of explosives.
In addition to the loading crews a
total of 67 officers and crew of the two
ships were at their stations, and various support personnel were present including the three-man civilian train crew and a Marine sentry, nine supervising
Navy officers, and 29 armed guards
watched over the procedure. A Coast
Guard fire barge with a crew of five
was docked at the pier.
Several
ships and boats stood near-by
in the harbor and the port facilities
teemed with other men on duty even this late at night.
At shortly after 10:15 witnesses ashore recalled hearing a “metallic sound and rending timbers, such as made by a falling boom.” That was
followed by an explosion on the pier and
a flash fire. Five to seven seconds
later a huge explosion engulfed the pier. From an enormous
fireball rose a mushroom shaped
cloud that eventually reached 30,000 feet.
The shock wave leveled buildings
near the pier and sent a mini-tidal wave
30 feet high rolling across the bay.
Concussion from the blast shattered windows in a radius of several
miles and it could be felt in San Francisco. Seismographs at the University of California at Berkeley recorded the two shock waves
traveling through the ground, determining the second, larger event to be equivalent
to an earthquake measuring 3.4 on the Richter Scale.
Shrapnel
like debris was scattered over a wide area and more that had been blasted high into
the air including large burning parts, continued
to fall for some time. Every boat
and ship in the harbor sustained some
damage as did most of the building of
the port.
The disaster made headlines in the Bay area and around the country. |
The E. A. Bryan was virtually
vaporized. Very little of its wreckage was ever found indicating that the explosion centered on or next to her. The Quinalt
Victory was lifted clear out of the
water by the blast, turned around
and broken into pieces and the largest piece which remained was a 65-foot section of the keel, its propeller attached, which protruded from the bay at low tide, 1,000 feet from its original position. The 12
ton locomotive on the pier was also atomized.
All 320 of the men on duty at the pier died instantly, and 390 civilians and military personnel were
injured, many seriously. Among the dead were all five Coast Guard personnel
posted aboard the fire barge. Blacks accounted 202 dead and 233 injured, which was 15% of all African-American naval
casualties during World War II.
Survivors
ashore, many of them injured themselves and including men from other loading gangs, rushed to the pier where they struggled to contain the fire and then
began the grim search for bodies. There were none to be found, at least intact.
One of the Black searchers later recalled:
I was there the next morning. We went back to the dock. Man,
it was awful; that was a sight. You’d see a shoe with a foot in it, and then
you’d remember how you’d joked about who was gonna be the first one out of the
hold. You’d see a head floating across the water—just the head—or an arm.
Bodies... just awful.
200 Back sailors volunteered to remain at the base and help with the clean-up operation. The rest, at least those not hospitalized,
but including many wounded, were temporarily
transferred elsewhere.
Given the total devastation and lack of surviving witnesses, a Navy investigation could never determine an
exact cause of the disaster, although the possibility of a faulty boom on
the Bryan was suspected by some. So was careless
handling by the loaders.
Investigators dismissed the
possibility that poor training and leadership, speed-ups, and the notorious speed loading contests could have contributed.
The Navy asked Congress to give each
victim’s family $5,000. Representative
John E. Rankin (D-Mississippi)
insisted the amount be reduced to
$2,000 when he learned most of the dead were Black.
By August the surviving Port Chicago
ammunition loaders, augmented by new and largely untrained recruits, were transferred to the large Mares Island facility. Because of embarrassing publicity, a new
system was put in place of rotating
between segregated Black and white gangs for around-the-clock loading
duty. On August 8 when men from the Port
Chicago unit were ordered to the USS Sangay with naval mines and other munitions 328 men said they were afraid and that they would not load munitions under the same officers and conditions as
before. The mass work stoppage
would have been called a strike if
the workers had been civilians.
But the Navy had another word for it—mutiny.
After refusing for two days 258 men were arrested and confined to a brig
barge designed to accommodate 75. On
August 11 they were marched to a field
where they were lectured on their duty
by Admiral Carleton H. Wright, Commander of 12th Naval District who
also threatened them with execution by
firing squad for mutiny in time of war. The men were told to separate themselves into groups—those who would promise to obey orders, and those who would not. Led by Seaman
First Class Joseph Randolph “Joe”
Small a group of 44 refused to obey
every order. They were marched back
to the brig. The next day six more sailors refused to report to duty
and were also arrested.
During August all 258 men—those who
agreed to obey future orders and those who refused—were closely interrogated by Navy officers in an attempt to discover the “ring leaders.” Many men were coerced into signing statements drafted by the officers that did not correspond to their actual
accounts. Others refused to sign anything.
All 250 were brought before court
martial and convicted of disobeying
orders. They suffered three months loss of pay, reduction in rank
where applicable, and those not held
as witnesses or defendants in the
upcoming mutiny trial were split
into smaller groups and shipped out
to various places in the Pacific
Theater where they were assigned to
menial duties like policing
cigarette butts at island bases.
When they concluded their tours
they were all given bad conduct
discharges which precluded them from
ever receiving veterans’ benefits.
The fate of the so-called Port Chicago 50 was worse.
A court martial trial for mutiny and conspiracy to disobey orders began at the Marine base at Treasure
Island in San Francisco Bay on
September 14. All 50 men plead not guilty. A lengthy
and acrimonious trial attracted national
attention. Thurgood Marshall, Chief Counsel for the National Association
for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP),
sat in on the proceedings, interviewed the defendants, and consulted with defense lawyers. In well
publicized press conferences he insisted
that the men had been improperly charged with mutiny and conspiracy when at most each might be guilty of individual insubordination, and then broadly attacked the Navy’s system of segregated job assignments
and the shoddy training and safety
procedures of the service.
On October 24, Admiral Osterhaus and the other
six members of the court deliberated for 80 minutes and found all 50 defendants guilty of mutiny.
Each man was reduced in rank to Seaman Apprentice and sentenced to 15 years of hard labor to be followed by dishonorable discharge. The men were held under guard while their sentences were passed to Admiral
Wright for review. On November 15, Wright reduced
the sentences for 40 of the men: 24 were given 12 years, 11 were given 10
years and the five youngest sailors
were given eight-year sentences. The
full 15-year sentences remained in place for ten of the men including Joe Small and another alleged “ring
leader” Ollie Green. In late November, the 50 men were transferred
to the Federal Correctional Institution
on Terminal Island in San Pedro Bay near the Port of Los Angeles.
The convictions and harsh sentences caused an uproar in the Black community. Naval enlistments
plummeted. Marshall and the NAACP planed a massive public campaign in support
of an appeal effort. Petitions began to circulate,
collecting thousands of names of citizens who demanded a reversal of the mutiny verdict. Protest meetings were held and powerful
people in sympathy to the cause were asked to bring pressure to bear, not the least of who was Eleanor Roosevelt who sent Navy Secretary James Forrestal a copy
of NAACPs Mutiny pamphlet in April 1945, asking him to take special care in this case. The Secretary ordered Admiral Wright to reconvene the court martial with instructions to disregard the hearsay
testimony. Admiral Osterhaus once again called the court to session for
deliberation and on June 12 the court reaffirmed
each of the mutiny convictions and sentences. Admiral Wright stuck by his reduced sentences.
After
the War ended in August, the Navy Department reduced each
man’s sentence by one year. This did not appease continued public outcry. In an October report to the Secretary Captain
Harold Stassen, future Governor of
Minnesota and perennial Republican
presidential candidate, recommended that the Navy reduce the sentences to just two years for men with good conduct records and three years for the rest, with credit for time served.
Ob January 6, 1946 the Navy
announced that 47 of the 50 men were
being released. They were paroled to
active duty aboard Navy vessels in the Pacific Theater, where the men were
assigned menial duties associated with
post-war base detail. Two of the 50 prisoners remained in the prison hospital for additional months recuperating from injuries, and one was
not released because of a bad conduct record.
Fred Meeks, last survivor of the Port Chicago 50 was 90 years old when he was finally pardoned by President Bill Clinton. |
But the bitter after taste lingered.
The Navy suffered a string of
embarrassing incidents caused by its segregationist
policies and poor treatment of Black sailors. It finally pushed the Navy into reluctantly ending segregation in units and by assignment. It took years, well into the post-war years, before the new policy
was fully implemented.
As for Port Chicago, it was rebuilt and returned to service. Atomic weapons were shipped from there for post-war testing in
the South Pacific. It shipped tons
of munitions to Korea, Vietnam, Persian
Gulf, Iraq, and Afghanistan Wars. Since the Vietnam War the railroad lines leading to the docks
have been the frequent site of protests and civil disobedience. In
response the Navy has annexed much
of the City of Port Chicago and built a virtual fortress with high walls that literally severed a major coastal highway.
And, if you are ever allowed to visit, somewhere near ground zero of the explosion is the Port Chicago Naval Magazine National Memorial was dedicated in 1994
to the lives lost in the explosion.
Three little-known but documented facts should lead to a new investigation of the Port Chicago explosion, and especially serious consideration of the nuclear explosion theory, First espoused by Peter Vogel in the Spring 1982 edition of The Black Scholar, the PCnet is the subject of my 2022 book, American Nuclear Deception: Why "the Port Chicago Experiment" must be investigated. Listed below are just a few of the surprising facts I discovered in my extensive research:
ReplyDelete1) Few people are aware that scientists and engineers used data from the Port Chicago explosion to produce the atomic bomb. Within days of the explosion, Navy Captain William S. Parsons, head of ordnance for the Manhattan Project, led a team of investigators to the site to study "the effects of the detonation." Speaking as Rear Admiral in 1948, Parsons told an audience at the Naval War College that the Port Chicago data provided his team with their first realistic expectations of blast damage.
2.) The memorandum authorizing the Port Chicago court martial was issued on July 14th, 1944. Two documents establishing this fact are included in the transcript of the trial. There may be a valid explanation for why the court martial was authorized three days before the explosion and three weeks before the "work stoppage" that led to the largest trial in U.S. Naval history. Without this explanation, though, the pre-explosion authorization date calls attention to the fact that "the" story of the unprecedented, historic blast became the story of the Port Chicago 50, as news of the explosion was soon and permanently upstaged by the highly publicized military tribunal.
3.) The most comprehensive and most often cited primary source of information about the explosion was the report issued by the Naval Court of Inquiry that investigated the explosion. The Court reported that the cause of the explosion could not be determined because key witnesses and evidence were lost in the blast. But a review of the entire record shows that in their summary Findings, Opinion and Recommendation, the Court chose not to report the testimony of witnesses who said the initial explosion took place on the S.S. Quinault Victory, the ship that had just arrived and had no ammunition aboard. That report was corroborated by the separate testimony of the salvage divers who discovered a hole in the hull of the Quinault Victory.
(It should be noted that one of the men on the three-man Court, Captain James Crenshaw, was the brother-in-law and long-time friend of Capt. Parsons.)
These are just a few of the surprising facts that emerge when the story of the Port Chicago explosion is viewed through the controversial lens of the Port Chicago nuclear explosion theory. At minimum, the documented link to the Manhattan Project should be a well-fact of history, and the obscurity of this fact lends credence to the discredited but not debunked theory.
The website of the Port Chicago Navy National Memorial simply says a nuclear test was 'unlikely." A claim this big demands strong evidence, but so does the counterclaim; and a claim this serious merits an equally sober response. Historians dismiss the PCnet as "hogwash"; yet there has been no official investigation of the increasingly plausible "conspiracy theory" that the blast was the result of a secret test conducted under the auspices of the Manhattan Project.
With so many secrets now emerging about nuclear history -- including the devastating impact of nuclear tests on American veterans and civilian populations -- these unknown, significant and documented facts suggest that the theory merits further investigation.