Yesterday
I re-posted a Washington
Post poll on facebook that showed a clear majority of Americans now support marriage
equality and that the trend is accelerating. While obviously something to celebrate, I
could not help but preface the post with a sort of snarky comment, “This will
be a big disappointment for Unitarian
Universalists who are addicted to being in a lonely minority.”
Not
that UUs have a corner on this. It
happens to a lot of social justice crusaders
who spend years, often most of their lives, fighting the unwinnable battle
against enormous odds. We are used to
being the only guy or gal out in the pouring rain with our picket sign expecting
to be spit upon. We are so instinctively
counter-cultural that we are
suspicious of any popular opinion.
But
what happens when after years of diligent work, we wake up and see that it has
really paid off—that slowly our concerns were heard, tolerated, accepted, and
finally embraced? The tipping point has been reached and
passed. Suddenly we are in the middle of
a Fourth of July parade down Main
Street.
It
can be a little disconcerting. Not all
of us know how to handle it. Some can’t
resist a smug I-told-you-so attitude.
Some insist on being recognized as heroes and denigrate the Johnny-come-latelies
who did not share the early sacrifices. Some
wander off looking for a new lost, lonely cause to invest their identities
in. Some will figure that the battle has
been won and abandon the effort. And
many, very many, will simply not know how to shift gears in the messaging and
tactics still necessary to translate that new-found majority status into
lasting social change.
When
I look at the top priorities that the Social
Justice Committee at my congregation, formerly the U.U. Congregation in McHenry now trying on the new moniker Tree of Life—A U.U. Congregation in McHenry
County, I see that in each case we are now reflective of general popular
opinion, or at least standing on ground moving rapidly to a majority.
- On marriage equality, despite solid evidence of plenty of support, we still face a hard battle convincing a timid Illinois House of Representatives to take action.
- In battling gun violence, we find even more overwhelming support for a broad range of reasonable regulation of the sale of military style weapons, high capacity ammunition clips, universal background checks, and other measures. Yet the loudest voices in the public debate are the NRA and the noisy gun-obsessed right wing fringe who frankly scare the crap out of everyone with their constant hints at civil war, assassination, and insurrection if they don’t get everything exactly as they demand.
- While there is less unanimity on exactly what to do about immigration reform, we find that the old deport-‘em-all-and-build-an-impenetrable-wall sentiment has waned if not disappeared. Most people are now for some form of a path to citizenship and for fairness to the youthful Dreamers who have spent almost their entire lives in this country. But simple naked racism and nativism die hard and a lot of economically distressed folks still worry about “them” taking their job.
- On reproductive rights, safe access to birth control and abortion as well as frank and truthful sex education in the schools were issues that went mainstream a generation ago. And despite everything, remains solidly supported a majority. But complacency that the battle had been won, let a highly motivated, well financed, and intensely angry minority seize a major national political party, come to power in many states, and in Congress and place all of those once safe gains at deadly peril.
It’s
not that I disparage the work and sacrifices of those who first broke the
ground, risked life and limb and, perhaps worse, ridicule. I would hope that I could have had the
courage to stand with Theodore Parker against
slavery, the ladies at Seneca Falls, with all of the martyrs
of the Civil Rights Movement. But in fact all of the movements they
fostered matured and won significant victories, even if imperfect ones. The culture changed. Only the most vicious and rabid want to go
back to the way it was.
The
point for us now is that although we are now buoyed by popular support, the
battles are not over. What has changed
is how address the issues in this new environment, embrace and encourage our
new allies, coax the with-us-in-spirit just a little out of their places of
trepidation and uncertainty. It is changing
the message from you should to we can.
Part
of that is dialing back the shrillness, the perpetual outrage, the
self-righteousness. It is about being
inclusive and not always insisting on being the one out front waving the flag
the hardest and shouting the loudest.
It
is good to remember what our enemies have taught us. As the paradigm on these issues has shifted,
it was accelerated as much by them as by our efforts. As they felt the once solid ground slipping
out from under them the haters hated more openly and insanely. The bigots forgot to cloak their intentions. The uncontrolled rage, the vituperation, the
raging paranoia not only scared the bejesus out of a lot of fence sitters and even
former allies. More and more folks
simply decided that they did not want to be associated with that kind of
ugliness anymore.
And
now they do not want to see that mirrored among their new friends. They want to be part of positive change, and
to be with positive people. To engage
them from passive support to participants will require a different voice and a
touch of humility.
Look,
I am not saying that we never again stand up and loudly and plainly speak truth
to Power, or that we are not permitted our anger, only that we need to focus it
differently.
That
is why the Standing on the Side of Love campaign
is so brilliant. It encourages reaching
out and inclusiveness, linking together sometimes isolated concerns and causes
under a common human understanding. It
uses the language of love, not righteousness, justice, not revenge.
As
the issue examples above show, there is still plenty of work to do. We need to do it better, smarter, and
kinder. And best of all, we don’t have
to do it alone.
Yes, as in, "How do UUs define themselves if not by a misguided sense of terminal uniqueness?"
ReplyDelete