Dr. King at Soldier Field. |
More
than 60,000 bodies crammed into Chicago’s
Soldier Field, then the seating capacity of the stadium on the Lake on Sunday, July 10, 1966. The
Sun-Times
reported the next day that thousands more were turned away. Although mega-watt stars were on hand to
perform including Mahalia Jackson, Stevie Wonder, and Peter Paul and Mary not a single ticket was sold to see them. The real star, you see, was the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and he had
something important to say that day—a challenge to the City of Chicago for
specific and systematic change to make African-American
citizens truly equal in a great Northern
city.
The
waves of change caused by that day continue to lap the shores of Lake Michigan nearly 50 years later.
In
1965 with a string of impressive victories for its relentless non-violent protest campaigns across
the South and Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting
Rights Act of 1965 under its belt, the Southern
Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)
began to cast its eye to the great northern cities where the Great Migration had established huge
populations of the Black Diaspora to
see if the tactics of non-violence and civil
disobedience could successfully
be applied outside of Dixie. No American city was a more important
destination and home for Blacks than Chicago—and
none so completely segregated in housing and by neighborhood.
The
city already had active and well known groups employing non-violent protest to
pressure City Hall for changes. The Coordinating
Council of Community Organizations (CCCO)
had its roots in protests to school policies under Superintendent of Public Instruction Benjamin Willis in the early ‘60s. A campaign of sit-ins and two mass attendance
boycotts were aimed at the de-facto
segregation of the public schools. Teacher Al Raby came to leadership of the loose organization that included
sometimes quarrelsome elements including militants of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE),
Chicago Area Friends of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating
Committee (SNCC) and the more
moderate Chicago Catholic Interracial
Council and the Chicago Urban League.
The
Quaker American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) was also active on the West
Side, the poorest of Chicago’s ghettos
and often ignored even by older
established Black groups based in long established South Side communities.
The AFSC anti-slum button was used by the Freedom Movement. |
The
SCLC’s Director of Direct Action James
Bevel came north in ’65 to work with the West side project and was soon
also in contact with Raby who wanted to launch a new campaign against housing
discrimination. With the blessing of Dr.
King, the SCLC committed its resources to the new effort dubbed the Chicago Freedom Movement. Bevel and a handful of other veteran SCLC
activists moved to the city to launch the project.
The
Chicago Freedom Movement declared
its intention to end slums in the city. It organized tenants’s unions, assumed control of a slum tenement, founded action groups like Operation Breadbasket, and attempted to rally both Black and white
citizens to support its goals. The
campaign created an uproar and attracted widespread publicity but was not
moving Mayor Richard J. Daley and
the establishment he represented to
make any concessions. Very reluctantly
Raby agreed to let Bevel call in the big gun—Dr. King himself.
For
King this was an opportunity he had been looking for. He had wanted for some time to turn his
attention to economic issues of
systematic racism that constrained
Black ambitions everywhere, not just in the South. And he wanted to challenge the complacency of
white liberals who gave lip service
to the cause as long as it was not on their doorstep.
In
January of ’66 King very publicly moved his family into a slum apartment on the
West Side. He announced his intention to
stay in the city and launched a new round of marches and protests. Just as Raby had feared, King became the face
of the movement, an eight-hundred-pound-gorilla in the media that left little
room for established local leaders.
And
as he must have expected, the city’s press, which had once painted him a hero
for freedom in the South, now frothed in unison that he was a dangerous outside agitator disturbing racial
harmony, provoking violence, and likely fronting for more shadowy radicals and
Communists.
By
spring it was apparent that vague or ad
hoc demands were not enough. At a
series of participatory democracy
meeting conducted by the CCCO, the Quakers on the West Side, and the new
Operation Breadbasket, the project of rising star the Rev. Jesse Jackson, ideas were gathered, refined, and sent back for
review and revision. In the end a list
of twelve demands was drawn up addressed to six power centers in the city.
The
question then was how best to present the demands to most dramatically get the
attention of authorities and to mobilize even greater participation in the
direct action campaign—a rally, a march on City Hall, an address to a main
civic organization like the Union League
which represented he establishment, a press conference, even the launch of
a hunger strike were all considered.
In
the end leadership of the campaign settled on a unique stunt followed by the
kind of mass rally of thousands where King’s legendary oratorical skills would rouse the Black community and White allies
to action.
The
big event required a scramble to organize.
Money, always a problem needed to be raised, and this time donations
from white liberal were drying up. There
were tricky negotiations with the Park
District, which was under the firm control of Daley loyalists, for use of
Soldier Field. Neighborhoods across the
city had to be organized and transportation for tens of thousands to the rally
site arranged. The press had to be
alerted and as much as possible massaged.
When
he arrived at the stadium for the mass rally, King entered in an open
convertible which drove around the cinder outer track before the bowl of
cheering supporters. In his speech, King
laid out the reason for the demands and campaign.
We are here
today because we are tired. We are tired of being seared in the flames of
withering injustice. We are tired of paying more for less. We are tired of
living in rat-infested slums and in the Chicago Housing Authority’s cement
reservations. We are tired of having to pay a median rent of $97 a month in
Lawndale for 4 rooms while whites in South Deering pay $73 a month for 5 rooms.
We are tired of
inferior, segregated, and overcrowded schools which are incapable of preparing
our young people for leadership and security in this technological age. We are
tired of discrimination in employment which makes us the last hired and the
first fired. We are tired of being by-passed for promotions while supervisory
jobs are granted to persons with less training, ability, and experience simply
because they are white. We are tired of the fact that the average white high
school drop-out in Chicago earns more money than the average Negro college
graduate.
We are tired of
a welfare system which dehumanizes us and dispenses payments under procedures
that are often ugly and paternalistic. Yes, we are tired of being lynched
physically in Mississippi, and we are tired of being lynched spiritually and
economically in the North.
We have also
come here today to remind Chicago of the fierce urgency of now. This is no time
to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of
gradualism. Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the
time to open the doors of opportunity to all of God's children. Now is the time
to end the long and desolate Night of Slumism. Now is the time to have a
confrontation in the city of Chicago between the forces resisting change and
the forces demanding change. Now is the time to let justice roll down from city
hall like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream….
And,
in the face of increased criticism of his strict commitment to non-violence by
growing numbers of militant Black Power advocates,
King reiterated his commitment:
I understand our
legitimate discontent. I understand our nagging frustrations. We are the
victims of a crisis of disappointment. But I must reaffirm that I do not see
the answer to our problems in violence. Our movement's adherence to nonviolence
has been a major factor in the creation of a moral climate that has made
progress possible. This climate may well be dissipated not only by acts of
violence but by the threats of it verbalized by those who equate it with
militancy. Our power does not reside in Molotov cocktails, rifles, knives and
bricks. The ultimate weakness of a riot is that it can be halted by superior
force. We have neither the techniques, the numbers nor the weapons to win a
violent campaign.
Many of our
opponents would be happy for us to turn to acts of violence in order to have an
excuse to slaughter hundreds of innocent people. Beyond this, violence never
appeals to the conscience. It intensifies the fears of the white majority while
relieving their guilt.
No, our power is
not in violence. Our power is in our unity, the force of our souls, and the
determination of our bodies. This is a force that no army can overcome, for
there is nothing more powerful in all the world than the surge of unarmed truth…
…Nonviolence
does not mean doing nothing. It does not mean passively accepting evil. It
means standing up so strongly with your body and soul that you can not stoop to
the low places of violence and hatred. I am still convinced that nonviolence is
a powerful and just weapon, it cuts without wounding. It is a sword that heals,
here in Chicago we must pick up the weapon of truth, the ammunition of courage,
we must put on the breastplate of righteousness and the whole armor of God. And
with this, we will have a non-violent army that no violent force can halt and
no political machine can resist.
Later
in the meeting Floyd McKissick,
President of CORE, a proponent of Black Power, and sometimes a harsh critic of
King, stepped to the microphone to assert that in this case CORE was in
complete agreement with not only the aims of the movement, but the strategy of
non-violent protest.
After
the rally King left the stadium. In
front of a large crowd and with TV film cameras grinding, King took advantage
of a reference to his historical
namesake and symbolically nailed the Freedom Movement demands on the doors
of City Hall. The demands were:
Real Estate Boards and Brokers
Public
statements that all listings will be available on a nondiscriminatory basis.
Banks and Savings Institutions
Public
statements of a nondiscriminatory mortgage policy so that loans will be
available to any qualified borrower without regard to the racial composition of
the area.
The Mayor and City Council
1.
Publication of headcounts of whites, Negroes and
Latin Americans for all city departments and for all firms from which city
purchases are made.
2.
Revocation of contracts with firms that do not have
a full scale fair employment practice.
3.
Creation of a citizens review board for grievances
against police brutality and false arrests or stops and seizures.
4.
Ordinance giving ready access to the names of owners
and investors for all slum properties.
5.
A saturation program of increased garbage
collection, street cleaning, and building inspection services in the slum
properties.
Political Parties
The
requirement that precinct captains be residents of their precincts.
Chicago Housing Authority and the Chicago Dwelling
Association
1.
Program to rehabilitate present public housing
including such items as locked lobbies, restrooms in recreation areas,
increased police protection and child care centers on every third floor.
2.
Program to increase vastly the supply of low-cost
housing on a scattered basis for both low and middle income families.
Business
1.
Basic headcounts, including white, Negro and Latin
American, by job classification and income level, made public.
2.
Racial steps to upgrade and to integrate all
departments, all levels of employments.
It
was a sweeping and ambitious agenda that demanded concessions from every aspect
of the power structure.
The
renewed campaign kicked off focused on open
housing demands with protests in front of real estate offices across the city and marches into white
neighborhoods. These marches were often
greeted with jeers—and sometimes violence—by neighborhood residence, most
famously in Marquette Park where
marchers were showered with bottles, bricks, and stones with little
interference from the police. King
himself suffered a minor head wound.
These
marches saw the support of white liberals dwindle. Among the first to bail out was the Catholic Archdiocese. Although many individual priests, nuns, and lay people continued to stand by King and march with the movement,
the Church withdrew its support while marchers strode through the heart of
their ethnic parishes. The editorial pages of the city’s great
newspapers denounced the marches as dangerous provocations and blamed the ensuing violence not on angry white
mobs, but on the non-violent marchers.
The
second aspect of the Movement’s drive was the inauguration of a series of summit meetings with civic leaders to
lay out the demands and open negotiations for accommodation. Some of the first of these were with the
Chicago Board of Realtors. But even these
meetings were denounced in the press as thinly
veiled extortion.
To
his dismay, King saw his hoped for dream of Whites and Blacks coming together
for justice evaporating in front of his eyes.
The city grew more racially polarized day by day and the phrase White backlash entered the language.
King attacked by white mob on housing march. |
But
despite the White anguish, the Black community was becoming too large, too
noisy, and, yes, too dangerous to be ignored.
Intimidation or not, some authorities were willing to strike at least
symbolic deals. After yet another march,
this time in South Deering on August
21, was attacked by a white mob, movement leaders and local politicians
arranged the Summit Agreement. King
agreed to halt marches into all-white neighborhoods and to postpone
indefinitely the planned march in Cicero.
In exchange, the city agreed to supply far-reaching guarantees for open housing
for African Americans.
Despite
pleas by King and Bevel, CORE defiantly went ahead with a march in the all-white
ethnic suburb of Cicero in September with about 1,500 participants. The marchers were, predictably mobbed and
mauled. Despite the protestations of the
Freedom Movement that they had nothing to do with the CORE march, they were
blamed anyway.
The
terms of the Summit Agreement, even those resulting in new ordinances by City
Hall, made little actual and practical difference to the lives of ordinary
Black Chicagoans. Raby, who felt snubbed
and ignored by King and Bevel, resigned from the CCCO, which soon ceased to
function. However the new Operation
Breadbasket stepped up and continued to press for the goals of the Movement
gaining power and influence over the years and making Jesse Jackson a major
national figure in his own right.
King
and Bevel left the city. They were disappointed. King considered the campaign largely a
failure and was stung by harsh criticism not just from liberal whites, but from
the increasingly influential Black Power movement. He turned increasingly to anti-Vietnam protests over the next two
years as he planned a major push on economic injustice he called the Poor People’s Campaign which he hoped
would re-unite Blacks, whites, Latinos,
and Native Americans in a common
cause. Preparations for that campaign
were put on hold for the Memphis Garbage
Strike and King’s assassination.
In
Chicago the conditions that gave rise to the Freedom Movement boiled over in
the West Side Riots of 1967 and the
riots following King’s assassination in 1968.
A
voting registration and get-out-the-vote off-shoot of the Freedom Movement led
by the SCLC’s Hosea Williams helped
set the stage for the rise of Black political power in the city and helped set
the stage for the eventual election of Mayor
Harold Washington.
All
part of the legacy of the meeting at Soldier Field.
But, by the way, Chicago remains the most residentially segregated city in the United States.
But, by the way, Chicago remains the most residentially segregated city in the United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment