John Hancock, the elegantly turned out young merchant, in 1765 by John Singleton Copely. |
The current occupant of the White House is likely the wealthiest man ever to gain the Presidency.
Certainly, he brags
constantly about being billionaire
and about the sharp business skills
that he claims made him successful. We
will discount for the moment the widely held suspicion of many
financial experts that he has wildly
exaggerated his personal wealth due
to the serial bankruptcies of his companies and crushing debt to a plethora
of banks around the world. The suspect his refusal to release his tax returns is to avoid being exposed. Even if
he is every bit as filthy rich as he
claims, his manifest deficiencies, incompetence,
reckless impulsiveness, and hyper-sensitive ego call into question
whether vast wealth alone in a good
criterion for the office. Or for that
matter even business experience.
On
the other hand, there is currently a boomlet
is underway for Oprah Winfrey to
run for President as a Democrat following
her highly praised speech at the Golden Globes. She may be the wealthiest woman in America and is certainly the richest female to have made her own money rather than inherit or marry it. She is also, like
the current Resident, a media celebrity albeit one that has shined much brighter over a longer
period of time. By contrast to the Cheeto in Charge, she is highly articulate, widely read, interested in
the world and makes actual human connection to folks across
the usual American divisions of race, class, ethnicity, and religion. Yet skeptics
doubt weather celebrity and success alone not matter how attractive are an adequate substitute for an utter
lack of actual government experience. And in Winfrey’s case red flags have been raised by her notorious susceptibility to the charms of New Age gurus,
self-help peddlers, and junk science
snake oil salesmen.
Most
American presidents have been comfortable,
and several have had real wealth by
inheritance. With the possible exception of George
Washington, who acquired large
estates and large numbers of slaves
by his marriage to wealthy widow Martha and who had vast land speculation holdings in the trans-Allegheny West, none were even close to being the wealthiest men of their
times. The two Roosevelts inherited solid
Old Money dating back to a family
fortune rooted in the Colonial
Era. The previously richest modern
President, John F. Kennedy, was the beneficiary of a fortune built largely
on Prohibition Era rum running, the movies—RKO Studio—and insider investment deals of his
Father. Several Presidents, including
some of the most admired, were born
in poverty. A few barely climbed out of
it in their lifetime.
So,
wealth has not by itself been seen as a prerequisite
for office. What about careers? Most chief
executives were lawyers and the
majority of those had extensive
political and government
experience. Some were planters or farmers of greater or lesser wealth. There were military officers and some combined two or all three of these experiences. After that things thin out. Although also a
lawyer John Quincy Adams was primarily a career diplomat. Accidental
President Andrew Johnson was a tailor, Woodrow Wilson and academic, and Herbert Hoover a mining
engineer. Only a couple were principally business men—Warren G. Harding was
a small city newspaper publisher,
and Harry S. Truman failed as a main street retailer—a haberdasher. One’s presidency was a failure wrapped in scandal, the other has cracked
top ten lists of best presidents, but also had long experience in local
government and in the U.S.
Senate. So perhaps, despite the frequent bleating of libertarians and Chamber of Commerce boosters, business experience is not that
essential.
All
of this long speculation is by way of introducing today’s subject—one of the
most powerful and influential of the Founding Fathers who never became President, but just might have if he had lived
longer. He was also one of if not the
richest man of his time, a shrewd businessman
who often skirted the law, and in
his own way true celebrity of his age.
But he also dedicated himself to elective public service on the local,
state, and national level. Compare and contrast to the current Oval Office denizen. Hey, they were both connected to notorious Tea
Parties…
A popular tinted print of Hancock after another Copely portrait in 1775 by William Smith. |
No, John Hancock
did not sell insurance. Or teach penmanship. But the man with probably the most famous signature in American history was, however, a very successful and wealthy man
who became a leading Patriot.
Some say he was the richest
man in the colonies. Probably
not. There were huge semi-feudal land
owners in New York, Philadelphia merchants, and Virginia planters like George Washington—who had the good
fortune to marry a very rich widow—who
probably had greater net worth. But
Hancock, a merchant, ship owner, and successful smuggler was certainly the richest man
in Boston in the years leading up
the Revolution. And unlike the New York and Virginia gentry
whose wealth was tied up in land and
slaves, Hancock had plenty of cold,
hard cash.
Hancock was born in comfortable circumstances in Braintree (now Quincy), Massachusetts on
January 12, 1737. His father was a
respected minister who baptized a
young neighbor named John Adams. When his father died in 1744 he was adopted
by his childless uncle, a wealthy
merchant with a mansion on Boston’s
Beacon Hill attended by a number of slaves. He was educated at Harvard and into his uncle’s business
as a clerk. He did not have to labor
long in such a capacity.
He was sent to England on firm business, met many of the
most powerful merchants in the country, and was on hand to personally observe
the coronation of George III. His uncle died in 1763
leaving him the House of Hancock, a counting house—a sort of combination bank and merchant firm with a small
fleet of ships engaged in profitable trade importing
cloth and manufactured goods
from England and exporting rum, cod,
and naval stores.
Not yet 30 years old, Hancock decided he wanted a political career. He could have one easily. With his wealth and position he could count
on favor and appointment if he joined most of his rich friends in the party in
support of the Royal Governor Francis Bernard. Instead, Hancock took another way.
Nobody is sure just who found who, or who tutored the other,
but Hancock fell in with a shirt tail
relative of his old Braintree neighbor.
Samuel Adams was already
putting together a political operation
based on the gangs of apprentices,
younger journeymen, and day laborers who held rival Pope’s Day parades and brawled against each other. Adams united the North and South Boston
gangs in ways that resembled the latter creation of urban political machines. As
tensions rose with the British over the Stamp
Act, Adams began to mold this group into the Sons of Liberty.
Hancock became their patron
and an adviser. He and Adams
often met in the mansion on Beacon Hill—the rich man in silk small clothes and the shabby operative who was so poor that
years later when he was elected to the Continental
Congress a subscription had to be raised to buy him a decent suit of
clothes.
In 1765 Hancock was first elected as one of five Boston Selectmen and in 1768 to the Massachusetts Assembly. As a supporter
of the Adams, the Clerk of the House, he was soon an acknowledged leader of the
anti-Bernard faction the Whigs.
Merchants, including Hancock had grown wealthy under the
Stamp Act illegally importing goods from non-British ports and off loading at minor ports with no customs officials. The practice was widespread and looked upon as
good business by the merchants and as smuggling by the British. When the Stamp Act was repealed Parliament imposed the Townsend Act which established an American Customs Board, increased
appointment of customs agents, tightened trading restrictions levying new
duties on a number of items.
Hancock led the public protest against the Townsend Act in
Boston and called for a public boycott of British goods until “taxation without representation”
ended. Customs official responded by
giving special attention to the ships of the city’s most important Whig.
On April 9, 1768 two customs official boarded Hancock’s Lydia
at dockside and demanded to expect the hold. Hancock was personally called to the ship and
refused to allow the tax men to search because they did not have a legal writ of assistance (search
warrant.) When one of the men tried to
enter the hold, Hancock had him seized bodily and thrown off the ship. Attempts to charge Hancock with a crime
failed when the Massachusetts Attorney
General ruled that he had done nothing wrong. Hancock was hailed a hero by citizens of
Boston.
A month later on May 9 another Hancock vessel, the Liberty
arrived in port with a cargo of Madera
wine. Hancock paid duties on the
cargo but was charged with secretly unloading more of it by night. The case fell apart when the customs men who
had spent the night on board reported that they had seen nothing. But when the British ship Rodney
entered port the next month on a mission of customs enforcement, one of the
customs men was taken on board where he changed his story and claimed that he
had been held against his will while the crew unloaded the contraband.
On June 10 the Liberty,
just loaded with an outbound cargo, was seized and towed to be moored
alongside the Rodney in the
harbor. The incident set off rioting in
town and customs agents were physically assaulted. They fled in fear for their lives to the Rodney for protection.
Cases were brought against both the ship and Hancock
personally. In August the ship and its cargo
were officially confiscated. The Liberty was put in service as a customs
enforcement ship until she was burned a year later by a mob in Rhode Island. The case against Hancock personally was
prosecuted in a vice admiralty court
where normal civil trial rights,
including the ability to cross examine
witnesses, were limited. If
convicted Hancock and his partners could have been fined three times the value
of the original cargo, estimated at £9,000, a huge sum in cash that might have
even broken him. Hancock was stubbornly
and ably defended by John Adams. After
five months the case was dropped with no explanation.
In response to the violent man handling of the customs men
and Sam Adams’s Circular Letters
promoting a unified resistance to the Townsend Duties across the colonies, the Ministry in London determined to send
troops to Boston. Bernard was instructed
to get the colonies to rescind recognition of Adams’s Circular Letter. Led by Hancock, the Massachusetts House refused to do so. Bernard was recalled to England.
With New England-born
Thomas Hutchinson now acting
Governor, tensions between Boston townsfolk and British troops in the city ran
high. After a snow ball assault on a Red Coat sentry blew up into the Boston Massacre in 1770, Hancock personally
informed Hutchinson and the English commander that 10,000 patriots were ready
to march on Boston to compel the withdrawal of troops. Despite the obvious bluff, Hutchinson agreed
to withdraw the two regiments that were quartered
on the town to a garrison at Castle William. Once again Hancock was hailed as a hero.
In an attempt to ease tensions, Parliament revoked most of
the Townsend duties, although it left some duties in place, largely to assert
its right to do so. Tensions eased in
Boston and Hutchinson attempted to lure Hancock to his side with an appointment
as Colonel of the Boston Cadets, a
militia unit whose primary function was to provide a ceremonial escort for the
governor and the General Court.
Hutchinson even approved for the first time after several previous elections,
of Hancock’s elevation to the Council,
the Governor’s official advisers.
Fearing that it would appear that he had been compromised, Hancock
refused the appointment.
After the passage of the Tea Act in 1773 imposing a heavy duty on imported tea, Hancock was
the moderator of a Town Meeting
which resolved that anyone supporting or paying the tea duties was an, Enemy to America. When three ships bearing East India Company tea arrived in the harbor, Sam Adams, Joseph Warren and other patriot leaders conferred with Hancock
at his mansion to plan a response.
Hancock was chair of a mass meeting on December 16 where he
declared, “Let every man do what is right in his own eyes.” That evening a small mob, some thinly
disguised as Indians, boarded the
ships and dumped hundreds of crates tea into the harbor. Hancock was not personally at the Boston Tea Party, but it was clear to
everyone that he was part of the leadership that made it possible.
Hancock kept a low profile for the next few months, both
because of public outrage at the destruction
of private property and because he was experiencing a painful episode of gout.
But he was well enough to give a rousing speech on the fourth
anniversary of the Boston Massacre which circulated as a broadside across the colonies.
After Hutchinson was replaced by General Thomas Gage as governor, the Assembly elected delegates to
the First Continental Congress. Hancock stayed home while other leaders
headed to Philadelphia. When Gage refused to let the General Court convene as scheduled in
October 1774, Hancock led the move to declare the body the Massachusetts Provincial Congress independent of control by the
Governor. He was elected President the
Congress and was a leading member of the Committee
on Public Safety which recommended the creation of Minutemen militia companies to be on call for rapid deployment.
In December he was elected a delegate to the Second Continental Congress. Tensions in Boston rose over the winter
and early spring. Hancock and Sam Adams
got word that they were to be arrested.
After attending a meeting of the Provincial Congress in Concord the two decided to stay in Lexington instead of returning to
Boston. On April 18 British troops were
sent to arrest the two men and seize cannon
at an arsenal in Concord. Paul
Revere spirited the two men away from Lexington as the British approached
the Green and the opening battle of
the Revolution was fought.
Still wanted in Massachusetts Hancock and other delegates
from the colony arrived in Philadelphia in May.
Now one of the most famous Patriots, he was elected President of the
Congress. John Adams promoted George Washington as commander of the
new Continental Army. Years later he
wrote that Hancock was disappointed not to have been selected. That may be, although there is no
corroborating evidence and the two men had become estranged by that time. At any rate, Hancock fully supported
Washington once he received the commission.
Hancock’s time as President of Congress was not without controversy. Even his old ally Sam Adams was shocked by
his display of wealth. Unlike many of
the delegates Hancock was welcome in the most fashionable homes in
Philadelphia. Many of his hosts were
suspected Tories. He attended congress in an elegant carriage
emblazoned with his arms and often attended by a mounted guards and servants.
Dorothy (Dolly) Quincy before her marriage to Hancock in 1772 by the ever busy Copley. John paid for this one, too. |
After Congress recessed for the year Hancock married his
long-time fiancé Dorothy Quincy.
Returning to Congress, Hancock served in the bleakest days
of the Revolution. After Washington was
driven from New York he worked
tirelessly in correspondence with the individual colonies to raise money and
troops. With other members, he had to
flee Philadelphia when the city was occupied by the British. As secretary of
the Marine Committee he had a
leading role in the creation of a Navy with
the commission of six frigates, one
of which was named in his honor.
Of course, Hancock is most famous for his signature on the Declaration of Independence. As President he had not participated in
the debate, although he was known to be an ardent Patriot. When the Declaration was adopted the first
printed copies, widely circulated as a broadside, contained only Hancock’s
name. For six months his name was the
only one publicly associated with the document until a new broadside was printed
with the names of other delegates.
There was no ceremonial signing. Those delegates still in town signed a
specially drafted hand-written copy on August 2. Hancock was the first to sign the large blank
space left for signatures. His signature
was large, legible, and written with a flourish. Years after the fact stories would circulate
that Hancock has said something about signing to large the “even King George”
could read it. Other delegates,
including some not present for the vote on Independence added their names to
what became the official copy over the next several months.
John Hancock's bold signature on the ceremonial copy of the Declaration nearly a month after its adoption became his most famous act. |
It was the pinnacle of Hancock’s public career, but hardly
the end. In 1777 he took leave of
Congress to return to Boston where he was re-elected to the legislature, as
Moderator of the Boston Town Meeting, and to another term in Congress. Returning to Philadelphia in 1778 he was
disappointed that he could not be re-elected President, southerner Henry Laurens having taken his
place. He did not enjoy the diminished
role. He did sign the Articles of Confederation before
returning to Boston to finally get a long-coveted chance at military glory.
He had been, on paper, the senior Major General of the Massachusetts militia since 1776. Now in August 1778 he took actual command of
6,000 ill trained men who joined Continental Regulars on an ill-conceived attack on Newport, Rhode Island. The
operation under General John Sullivan
was a disaster. The militia broke and
ran exposing the Continentals to withering fire. That ended his military career, but scarcely
damaged his political popularity at home.
When the new Massachusetts
Constitution went into effect in
1780, Hancock was elected Governor by
a landslide with more than 90% of the vote.
He continued to be re-elected to annual terms until he unexpectedly
resigned in January 1785 as tensions over taxation mounted in the western part
of the state. His successor was left to
put down Shay’s Rebellion. With the crisis past, he was re-elected
in 1787, his hands unsullied by the blood of rebellious farmers. He pardoned the remaining Shay’s
defendants. He remained Governor the
rest of his life, although he took an increasingly hands-off approach as the
years went on.
He was also elected to the new Congress under the Articles
of Confederation and offered the presidency of congress, but he declined,
citing health issues. He never took his
seat, probably recognizing the weakness of Congress in the post-Revolutionary era.
John and Dorothy Hancock by, surprise!--Edward Savage in 1788. |
In 1788 as chair of the Massachusetts Ratifying Convention he threw his support to the new Constitution, once again in alliance
with his long estranged former ally Sam Adams.
His final speech on the subject was credited with the narrow victory for
adoption by a vote of 187 to 168.
In the election of the first President by the Electoral
College, Hancock allowed his name to be put forward. He knew that Washington would be the
unanimous choice, but hoped to win the vice-presidency. Custom and decorum prevented him from
campaigning or even acknowledging that he was interested. In the end he got only 4 votes and his home
state electors unanimously supported the eventual winner, John Adams. It was a disappointment but did not affect
his popularity as governor.
After years of failing health, Hancock died with his wife at
his side on October 8, 1793 at the age of 56.
His only two children had died before adulthood. He was succeeded as governor by his old ally
and later nemesis Sam Adams who
declared a state holiday for the burial.
The funeral and burial procession was the most lavish seen in America up
to that time.
No comments:
Post a Comment