After
seeing productions of the still popular play Inherit the Wind or
catching the wonderful movie version starring Spencer Tracy and Fredrick
March one might conclude that the victory of the Theory of Evolution was complete.
And indeed, for decades it seemed so.
Educated people accepted it in general terms even if they were fuzzy on
the details. It was not only taught in
schools, it was the foundation on which much science and all biology
instruction. By in large it was uncontroversial.
Of
course a religious minority refused to accept it, but for the most part did not
attempt again to remove instruction about it from schools or at most conducted
a futile, low grade guerilla campaign against it.
But
with the rise of the religious right to
real political power through the Republican
Party in some states, anti-evolution has come roaring back with a vengeance,
sometimes under the guise of something called intelligent design and sometime by advancing the reasonable
sounding argument that public schools should offer students the opportunity to
examine “all theories” of the origin of life and humanity side-by-side. They do this by twisting the meaning of the
word theory beyond all scientific understanding.
Texas, which because of the large
number of texts sold in that state which much conform to a curriculum approved
by the state Board of Education influences
text books sold throughout the nation, has eliminated most references to
evolution. Kansas and other states have passed draconian laws about what can
and cannot be taught about it. Out of
fear of controversy, school districts across the country quietly remove it or
down play it.
Meanwhile
tourists flock to a Tennessee theme
park that depicts dinosaurs and cavemen living side by side. Surveys show that close to half of all adults
now reject Darwinian evolutionary
theory. Scientists fret that a dark age
of ignorance and superstition may be descending on the nation and even some
thinking conservatives worry—very quietly—about
how modern business dependent of science and technology can thrive when science
itself is denied and even vilified.
But
on July 21, 1925 when the very real Tennessee school teacher John T. Scopes was found guilty and
fined $100 for teaching his high school students about evolution, it did indeed
look like modernity had won, just like in the play based on that real trial. Here’s what happened
On
May 25, 1925 Scopes, a high school biology teacher in Dayton, Tennessee was indicted on charges of violating the state’s Butler Act which made it a crime to
teach that humans descend from apes or other “lower forms,” a key element in
the theory of evolution. Scopes had been
recruited by the American Civil
Liberties Union to allow himself to be used as a test case for the recently
enacted law. He was arrested and charged
on May 5 for teaching from a state approved text book with a chart illustrating
“the descent of Man” on April 7.
Scopes was released on bail of $100 paid for by the publisher of the Baltimore
Sun.
At
his request some of his students testified against him in front of the Grand Jury which returned the
indictment.
Things
got out of hand when local attorneys Herbert E. and Sue K. Hicks,
brothers friendly to Scopes, were replaced as lead prosecutors by the
politically ambitious Tom Stewart who
would ride his role in the case all the way to the U. S. Senate. Still not
satisfied, William Bell Riley, the
founder and president of the World
Christian Fundamentals Association, the leading voice of
the still fledgling Fundamentalist
movement, recruited three time Presidential
nominee William Jennings Bryan to
join the team. That insured, as Scopes
himself later acknowledged, that the controversy could never be contained “within the bounds of constitutionality.”
Bryan was a leading Democratic
Party liberal who had most recently served as Woodrow Wilson’s Secretary of State before resigning in protest to
Wilson’s increasing moves to enter the First
World War. But the Great Commoner was also intensely
religious and a known believer in the “inerrancy of the Bible.” He was also a very
rusty lawyer, having not tried a case in 36 years.
John
R. Neal, a law school
professor from Knoxville was
nominally the lead for the defense, but was upstaged when Clarence Darrow, the nation’s most famous trial lawyer and most
notorious Freethinker volunteered
his services. ACLU attorney Arthur Garfield Hays, and New York society divorce lawyer Dudley Field Malone rounded out the
defense team.
When Darrow arrived he pushed aside the original ACLU plan
to attack the case as a violation of teacher’s individual free speech rights
and academic freedom and was therefore unconstitutional. Darrow preferred to try to show that there
was no conflict between the Bible and the theory of evolution. He planned a defense that relied on expert
testimony by both scientists and non-fundamentalist religious scholars.
By the time the trial was underway in July, Dayton had
become a three ring circus of Evangelical
tent crusades, book peddlers, advocates on both sides, and a press frenzy
led by H. L. Menken, the acid penned
columnist for the Baltimore Sun, which
was underwriting the defense. Menken
dubbed the case the Monkey Trial.
There were also newsreel cameras and the microphone of WGN Radio inside the courtroom, making it the most documented court
case in history.
From the outset Judge
John T. Raulston, who began his instruction to the jurors with Biblical
quotations from Genesis, was hostile
to the defense and clashed repeatedly with Darrow. He disallowed repeated efforts to introduce
expert testimony. Bryan was called upon
by the prosecution to argue against the introduction of expert testimony, but
strayed far to a mocking taunt to Darrow and evolutionists which played well
with gallery, but opened up a can of worms for the prosecution. Bryan’s arguments were countered by Malone
in what most legal historians regard as the high point of the trial.
Frustrated, Darrow hit upon calling Bryan to the stand as
an expert on the Bible based on his earlier argument. The move stunned the prosecution, but Bryan
foolishly accepted thinking that he could best Darrow one-on-one. Darrow’s relentless demolition of Bryan and
his theories is the best remembered part of the trial and is the center piece
of Inherit the Wind which quoted
directly from the court records in some cases and paraphrased much else.
After two hours of questioning in an open air session on
the court house lawn—moved there because of crowding and oppressive heat in the
courtroom—Judge Raulston refused to allow it to continue the next day and then ruled
the whole thing inadmissible and expunged from the record. Darrow asked that the jury be called in
because the judge’s conduct of the trial made it a waste of time to conduct a
defense.
He expected a guilty verdict, but rested his case after
telling the jury, “We came down here to offer evidence in this case and the
court has held under the law that the evidence we had is not admissible, so all
we can do is to take an exception and carry it to a higher court to see whether
the evidence is admissible or not. . . . we cannot even explain to you that we
think you should return a verdict of not guilty. We do not see how you could.
We do not ask it.”
It took the jury 9 minutes to reach a guilty
verdict. Judge Raulston imposed a $100
fine before even allowing Scopes to speak.
Upon objection he let Scopes have his only say of the trial, “…I have
been convicted of violating an unjust statute. I will continue in the future,
as I have in the past, to oppose this law in any way I can…”
It was generally believed that despite the outcome,
Darrow and the Theory of Evolution won the case in the court of public
opinion. Dayton and the Bible Belt were widely mocked. Exhausted and demoralized the Bryan died of a
heart attack in Dayton at the age of 65 just five days after the trial
ended.
The Tennessee
Supreme Court overturned Scope’s conviction on a technicality and did not
rule on the Butler Law’s Constitutionality.
The ACLU was unable to find another teacher willing to be a test case
and the law remained on the books until the 1970s.
Frightened publishers stripped evolution from almost all
text books issued for the next ten years.
Evolution was only slowly re-introduced.
By the 1950’s, however, the tide had turned and evolution was back
almost unchallenged, even where local laws forbad it, across the country.
On a final personal note, back in 1967 I played Mathew Harrison Brady, the character
based on Bryan, in a production of Inherit
the Wind at Niles West High School
in the Chicago suburbs. It is doubtful that any public school in
America would dare present that play today.
No comments:
Post a Comment